Anti-glucagon receptor antibodies and methods of use thereof

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides antagonizing antibodies that bind to glucagon receptor and methods of using same. The anti-glucagon receptor antibodies can be used therapeutically to lower glucose levels in blood, and can be in the prevention and/or treatment of glucose-related disorders, including diabetes, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, or metabolic syndrome.

This application claims priority, under 35 USC §119(e), to U.S.Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/820,604, filed May 7, 2013, and U.S.Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/981,115, filed Apr. 17, 2014, herebyincorporated by reference in their entireties.

REFERENCE TO SEQUENCE LISTING

This application is being filed electronically via EFS-Web and includesan electronically submitted sequence listing in .txt format. The .txtfile contains a sequence listing entitled “SequenceListing_PC33992A”created on May 1, 2014 and having a size of 72 KB. The sequence listingcontained in this .txt file is part of the specification and is hereinincorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD

The present invention relates to antibodies, e.g., full lengthantibodies that bind glucagon receptor. The invention further relates tocompositions comprising antibodies to glucagon receptor, and methods ofusing anti-glucagon receptor antibodies as a medicament. Theanti-glucagon receptor antibodies can be used therapeutically to lowerglucose levels in blood, and can be in the prevention and/or treatmentof glucose-related disorders, including diabetes.

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is a major public health concern because of its increasingprevalence and associated health risks. The disease is characterized bymetabolic defects in the production and utilization of carbohydrateswhich result in the failure to maintain appropriate plasma glucoselevels. Two major forms of diabetes are recognized. Type I diabetes(T1D), or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, is the result of anabsolute deficiency of insulin. Type II diabetes (T2D), or non-insulindependent diabetes mellitus, often occurs with normal, or even elevatedlevels of insulin and appears to be the result of the inability oftissues and cells to respond appropriately to insulin. Aggressivecontrol of T2D with medication is essential; otherwise it can progressinto p-cell failure and insulin dependence.

Glucagon is a twenty-nine amino acid peptide which is secreted from theacells of the pancreas into the hepatic portal vein thereby exposing theliver to higher levels of this hormone than non-hepatic tissues. Plasmaglucagon levels decrease in response to hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia,elevated plasma non-esterified fatty acid levels and somatostatinwhereas glucagon secretion is increased in response to hypoglycemia andelevated plasma amino acid levels. Glucagon, through activation of itsreceptor, is a potent activator of hepatic glucose production byactivating glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis. In T2D individuals, basalglucagon levels are high and inadequately suppressed by hyperglycemiaand hyperinsulinemia.

The glucagon receptor is a 62 kDa protein that is activated by glucagonand is a member of the class B G-protein coupled family of receptors.The glucagon receptor is encoded by the GCGR gene in humans and thesereceptors are mainly expressed in the liver with lesser amounts found inthe kidney, heart, adipose tissue, spleen, thymus, adrenal glands,pancreas, cerebral cortex and gastrointestinal tract. Stimulation of theglucagon receptor results in activation of adenylate cyclase andincreased levels of intracellular cAMP.

Genetic disruption of glucagon receptor expression in mice (Gcgr−/−)lowers fasting and fed glucose levels and improves glycemic control.However, the Gcgr−/− mice develop hyperglucagonemia, pancreatic a cellhyperplasia, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Gelling, R. W. etal., 2003, “Lower plasma glucose, hyperglucagonemia, and pancreaticalpha cell hyperplasia in glucagon receptor knockout mice” Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100: 1438-1443; Yu, R. et al., 2011, “Pancreaticneuroendocrine tumors in glucagon receptor-deficient mice” Plos ONE6(8): e23397). Similarly, a human patient born with a homozygousinactivating GCGR mutation (P86S) develops pancreatic neuroendocrinetumors and exhibits hyperglucagonemia and pancreatic a cell hyperplasia(Yu,R. et al., 2008, “Nesidioblastosis and hyperplasia of alpha cells,microglucagonoma, and nonfunctioning islet cell tumor of the pancreas”Pancreas 36: 428-431).

Several drugs in five major categories, each acting by differentmechanisms, are available for treating hyperglycemia and subsequently,T2D (Moller, D. E., 2011, “New drug targets for Type 2 diabetes and themetabolic syndrome” Nature 414: 821-827): (A) Insulin secretogogues,including sulphonyl-ureas (e.g., glipizide, glimepiride, glyburide) andmeglitinides (e.g., nateglidine and repaglinide) enhance secretion ofinsulin by acting on the pancreatic beta-cells. While this therapy candecrease plasma glucose level, it has limited efficacy and tolerability,causes weight gain and often induces hypoglycemia. (B) Biguanides (e.g.,metformin) are thought to act primarily by decreasing hepatic glucoseproduction. Biguanides often cause gastrointestinal disturbances andlactic acidosis, further limiting their use. (C) Inhibitors ofalpha-glucosidase (e.g., acarbose) decrease intestinal glucoseabsorption. These agents often cause gastrointestinal disturbances. (D)Thiazolidinediones (e.g., pioglitazone, rosiglitazone) act on a specificreceptor (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma) in theliver, muscle and fat tissues. They regulate lipid metabolismsubsequently enhancing the response of these tissues to the actions ofinsulin. Frequent use of these drugs may lead to weight gain and mayinduce edema and anemia. (E) Insulin is used in more severe cases,either alone or in combination with the above agents.

From the information available in the art, and prior to the presentinvention, it remained unclear whether the introduction of anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody into the blood circulation to selectivelyantagonize glucagon receptor would be safe and effective to lower plasmaglucose levels and prevent and/or treat diabetes, and, if so, whatproperties of an anti-glucagon receptor antibody are needed for such invivo safety and effectiveness.

SUMMARY

Antibodies that selectively interact with glucagon receptor areprovided. It is demonstrated that certain anti-glucagon receptorantibodies are effective in vivo to prevent and/or treat diabetes.Advantageously, the anti-glucagon receptor antibodies provided herein donot adversely affect liver function or plasma lipids. Alsoadvantageously, the anti-glucagon receptor antibodies provided hereinare effective in vivo to reduce C-peptide levels in blood.

Isolated antagonist antibodies that specifically bind to glucagonreceptor and prevent or reduce the biological effect of glucagonreceptor are provided herein. In some embodiments, the antagonistantibody can be, for example, a human, humanized, or chimeric antibody.

In some embodiments, the isolated antagonist antibody may comprise, forexample, a heavy chain variable region (VH) comprising a VHcomplementarity determining region one (CDR1), VH CDR2, and VH CDR3 ofthe VH having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3, 5, 7, 9 or11; and/or a light chain variable region (VL) comprising a VL CDR1, VLCDR2, and VL CDR3 of the VL having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8 or 10. Each CDR of the antibody can be defined inaccordance with, for example, the Kabat definition, the Chothiadefinition, the combination of the Kabat definition and the Chothiadefinition, the AbM definition, and/or the contact definition of CDR.

In some embodiments, the antibody may comprise, for example, a heavychain variable region (VH) selected group the group consisting of: (a) aVH comprising a VH complementarity determining region one (CDR1), VHCDR2, and VH CDR3 of the VH having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQID NO: 3; (b) a VH comprising a VH CDR1, VH CDR2, and VH CDR3 of the VHhaving the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 5; (c) a VHcomprising a VH CDR1, VH CDR2, and VH CDR3 of the VH having the aminoacid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 7; (d) a VH comprising a VH CDR1, VHCDR2, and VH CDR3 of the VH having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQID NO: 9; and (e) a VH comprising a VH CDR1, VH CDR2, and VH CDR3 of theVH having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 11; and a lightchain variable region (VL) selected from the group consisting of: (f) aVL comprising a VL CDR1, VL CDR2, and VL CDR3 of the VL having the aminoacid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 2; (g) a VL comprising a VL CDR1, VLCDR2, and VL CDR3 of the VH having the amino acid sequence shown in SEQID NO: 4; (h) a VL comprising a VL CDR1, VL CDR2, and VL CDR3 of the VHhaving the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 6; (i) a VLcomprising a VL CDR1, VL CDR2, and VL CDR3 of the VH having the aminoacid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 8; and (j) a VL comprising a VL CDR1,VL CDR2, and VL CDR3 of the VH having the amino acid sequence shown inSEQ ID NO: 10.

In some embodiments, the antibody may comprise, for example, a VH CDR1comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 24, 16 or 25, a VH CDR2comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 18 or 26, a VH CDR3comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 41, a VL CDR1comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 40, a VL CDR2comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 13, and/or a VLCDR3 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 14.

In some embodiments, the antibody may comprise, for example, a VHcomprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3, 5, 7, 9 or 11or a variant thereof with one or several conservative amino acidsubstitutions in residues that are not within a CDR. In someembodiments, the antibody may comprise, for example, a VL comprising theamino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8 or 10 or a variantthereof with one or several amino acid substitutions in amino acids thatare not within a CDR.

In some embodiments, the antibody may comprise, for example, a VHcomprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 11 and/or a VLcomprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 10. In someembodiments, the antibody may comprise, for example, a heavy chaincomprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 87 or 88 and/or alight chain comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 89.

In some embodiments, the antibody may comprise an immunologically inertconstant region. In some embodiments, the constant region may be, forexample, aglycosylated Fc. In some embodiments, the antibody maycomprise an isotype that is selected from the group consisting of IgG₂,IgG_(2Δa), IgG₄, IgG_(4Δb), IgG_(4Δc), IgG₄ S228P, IgG_(4Δb) S228P andIgG_(4Δc) S228P.

Also provided herein are isolated anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibodies that specifically bind to an epitope that is the same as oroverlaps with the epitope on glucagon receptor recognized by themonoclonal antibody mAb1, mAb2, mAb3, mAb4 or mAb5. In some embodiments,the antibody may comprise a VH CDR1 comprising the amino acid sequenceof SEQ ID NO: 17, a VH CDR2 comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ IDNO: 93, a VH CDR3 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:94, a VL CDR1 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 90,a VL CDR2 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 91,and/or a

VL CDR3 comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 92. Insome embodiments, the epitope is a structural epitope. In someembodiments, the epitope comprises amino acid residues 31, 33-38, 40-42,44-45, 48, 62, and 64 of the glucagon receptor amino acid sequence shownin SEQ ID NO: 1. In some embodiments, the epitope is a functionalepitope. In some embodiments, the functional epitope comprises aminoacid residues 33, 36, 38, 41, 44 and 45 of the glucagon receptor aminoacid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. In some embodiments, the functionalepitope comprises amino acid residues 33, 36, 38, 41, 44, 45 and 60 ofthe glucagon receptor amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 1.

Also provided are cell lines that produce one or more antibodiesprovided herein.

Also provided are isolated nucleic acids encoding the antibodiesprovided herein. In some embodiments the isolated nucleic acids can beoperably linked to a control sequence. In some embodiments, the isolatednucleic acids can comprise a polynucleotide sequence encoding the lightchain variable domain, the heavy chain variable domain, or both, of anantibody provided herein.

Also provided are recombinant expression vectors comprising nucleicacids provided herein. Also provided are host cells comprising any ofthe expression vectors provided herein. Also provided are hybridomascapable of producing any of the antibodies provided herein.

Also provided are methods of producing an anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody provided herein. In some embodiments, the methodcomprises: culturing a cell line that produces the antibody underconditions wherein the antibody is produced; and recovering theantibody. In some embodiments, the method comprises: culturing a cellline comprising nucleic acid encodihyrng an antibody comprising a heavychain comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 87 or 88and a light chain comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:89 under conditions wherein the antibody is produced; and recovering theantibody. In some embodiments, the heavy and light chains are encoded onseparate vectors. In other embodiments, the heavy and light chains areencoded on the same vector.

Also provided are pharmaceutical compositions comprising one or moreantibodies provided herein, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.Also provided are kits for the treatment of a condition mediated byglucagon receptor comprising a pharmaceutical composition comprising oneor more antibodies provided herein.

Also provided are methods for lowering blood glucose, improving glucosetolerance, lowering C-peptide levels, preventing significant increase inblood levels of C-peptide, and/or treating or preventing a conditionmediated by glucagon receptor in an individual in need thereof. In someembodiments, the method comprises administering to the individual aneffective amount of an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodyprovided herein, such that a blood glucose level is lowered, glucosetolerance is improved, and/or one or more symptoms associated with thecondition is ameliorated in the individual. In other embodiments, themethod comprises administering to the individual an effective amount ofan anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody provided herein, such thata C-peptide level is lowered in the individual. In other embodiments,the method comprises administering to the individual an effective amountof an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody provided herein, and anmTor inhibitor, such that a blood glucose level is lowered, glucosetolerance is improved, and/or one or more symptoms associated with thecondition is ameliorated in the individual. The individual can be, forexample without limitation, a mammal. In some embodiments, theindividual is a human. In some embodiments, the anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody reduces weight gain in the individual.

In some embodiments, the condition is, for example, type 1 diabetes,type 2 diabetes, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, impaired fastingglucose, impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, diabeticketoacidosis, long-term complications associated with diabetes,metabolic syndrome, or other metabolic disorders characterized in partby elevated blood glucose levels.

In some embodiments, changes in the alpha cells of the pancreatic isletsafter anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody treatment are reversedafter levels of anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody in theindividual fall below a minimally efficacious threshold level.

In some embodiments, changes in glycogen accumulation in hepatocytesafter anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody treatment are reversedafter levels of anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody in theindividual fall below a minimally efficacious threshold level.

In some embodiments, the method can further comprise administering aneffective amount of a second therapeutic agent. In some embodiments, thesecond therapeutic agent is, for example, insulin, an mTor inhibitor, abiguanide, a sulfonylurea, a PPAR gamma agonist, an alpha glucosidaseinhibitor, EXENATIDE®, SYMLIN®, a glucagon antagonist, or a secondglucagon receptor antagonist. In some embodiments, the biguanide is, forexample, metformin. In some embodiments, mTor inhibitor is, for example,rapamycin, sirolimus, temsirolimus, everolimus, ridaforolimus, or anATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitor (TKI). In some embodiments, theTKI is, for example, Torin1, Torin 2, PP242, PP30, KU0063794, WAY-600,WYE-687, WYE-354, OSI-027, AZD-8055, KU-BMCL-200908069-1,Wyeth-BMCL-200908069-2, XL-388, INK-128, and AZD-2014. In someembodiments, combination treatment with an mTOR inhibitor reduceshypertrophy and/or hyperplasia elicited by blocking glucagon receptoractivity.

Also provided is the use of any of the anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibodies provided herein in the manufacture of a medicament for thetreatment or prevention of type 1 or type 2 diabetes or for achievingweight loss in a human. In some embodiments, the anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody reduces weight gain in the individual.

Also provided are anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodies for usein the treatment of a condition mediated by glucagon receptor. In someembodiments, the condition is, for example, type 1 diabetes, type 2diabetes, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, impaired fasting glucose,impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, or metabolic syndrome.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES/DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a graph summarizing results of a cAMP assay.

FIG. 2A depicts a graph summarizing the results of an alanineaminotransferase (ALT) test in animals administered either anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody mAb5 (open circles) or PBS (closedcircles). FIG. 2B depicts a graph summarizing the results of anaspartate aminotransferase (AST) test in animals administered eithermAb5 (open circles) or PBS (closed circles).

FIG. 3A depicts a graph summarizing the results of an alkalinephosphatase (ALP) test in animals administered either mAb5 (opencircles) or PBS (closed circles). FIG. 3B depicts a graph summarizingthe results of agamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) test in animalsadministered either mAb5 (open circles) or PBS (closed circles).

FIG. 4A depicts a graph summarizing the total cholesterol levels inanimals administered either mAb5 (open circles) or PBS (closed circles).FIG. 4B depicts a graph summarizing the LDL-C levels in animalsadministered either mAb5 (open circles) or PBS (closed circles).

FIG. 5A depicts a graph summarizing the HDL-C levels in animalsadministered either mAb5 (open circles) or PBS (closed circles). FIG. 5Bdepicts a graph summarizing the triglyceride levels in animalsadministered either mAb5 (open circles) or PBS (closed circles).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed herein are antibodies that specifically bind to glucagonreceptor. Methods of making anti-glucagon receptor antibodies,compositions comprising these antibodies, and methods of using theseantibodies as a medicament are provided. Anti-glucagon receptorantibodies can be used to lower plasma glucose levels, and can be usedin the prevention and/or treatment of T1 D, T2D or related disordersincluding hyperglycemia, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucosetolerance, dyslipidemia, obesity, nephropathy, retinopathy, cataracts,stroke, atherosclerosis, impaired wound healing, diabetic ketoacidosis,hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome, perioperative hyperglycemia,hyperglycemia in the intensive care unit patient, insulin resistancesyndrome, and metabolic syndrome.

General Techniques

The practice of the present invention will employ, unless otherwiseindicated, conventional techniques of molecular biology (includingrecombinant techniques), microbiology, cell biology, biochemistry andimmunology, which are within the skill of the art. Such techniques areexplained fully in the literature, such as, Molecular Cloning: ALaboratory Manual, second edition (Sambrook et al., 1989) Cold SpringHarbor Press; Oligonucleotide Synthesis (M. J. Gait, ed., 1984); Methodsin Molecular Biology, Humana Press; Cell Biology: A Laboratory Notebook(J. E. Cellis, ed., 1998) Academic Press; Animal Cell Culture (R. I.Freshney, ed., 1987); Introduction to Cell and Tissue Culture (J. P.Mather and P. E. Roberts, 1998) Plenum Press; Cell and Tissue Culture:Laboratory Procedures (A. Doyle, J. B. Griffiths, and D. G. Newell,eds., 1993-1998) J. Wiley and Sons; Methods in Enzymology (AcademicPress, Inc.); Handbook of Experimental Immunology (D. M. Weir and C. C.Blackwell, eds.); Gene Transfer Vectors for Mammalian Cells (J. M.Miller and M. P. Calos, eds., 1987); Current Protocols in MolecularBiology (F. M. Ausubel et al., eds., 1987); PCR: The Polymerase ChainReaction, (Mullis et al., eds., 1994); Current Protocols in Immunology(J. E. Coligan et al., eds., 1991); Short Protocols in Molecular Biology(Wiley and Sons, 1999); Immunobiology (C. A. Janeway and P. Travers,1997); Antibodies (P. Finch, 1997); Antibodies: a practical approach (D.Catty., ed., IRL Press, 1988-1989); Monoclonal antibodies: a practicalapproach (P. Shepherd and C. Dean, eds., Oxford University Press, 2000);Using antibodies: a laboratory manual (E. Harlow and D. Lane (ColdSpring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1999); The Antibodies (M. Zanetti and J.D. Capra, eds., Harwood Academic Publishers, 1995).

Definitions

The following terms, unless otherwise indicated, shall be understood tohave the following meanings: the term “isolated molecule” as referringto a molecule (where the molecule is, for example, a polypeptide, apolynucleotide, or an antibody) that by virtue of its origin or sourceof derivation (1) is not associated with naturally associated componentsthat accompany it in its native state, (2) is substantially free ofother molecules from the same source, e.g., species, cell from which itis expressed, library, etc., (3) is expressed by a cell from a differentspecies, or (4) does not occur in nature. Thus, a molecule that ischemically synthesized, or expressed in a cellular system different fromthe system from which it naturally originates, will be “isolated” fromits naturally associated components. A molecule also may be renderedsubstantially free of naturally associated components by isolation,using purification techniques well known in the art. Molecule purity orhomogeneity may be assayed by a number of means well known in the art.For example, the purity of a polypeptide sample may be assayed usingpolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and staining of the gel to visualizethe polypeptide using techniques well known in the art. For certainpurposes, higher resolution may be provided by using HPLC or other meanswell known in the art for purification.

An “antibody” is an immunoglobulin molecule capable of specific bindingto a target, such as a carbohydrate, polynucleotide, lipid, polypeptide,etc., through at least one antigen recognition site, located in thevariable region of the immunoglobulin molecule. As used herein, the termencompasses not only intact polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies, butalso, unless otherwise specified, any antigen binding portion thereofthat competes with the intact antibody for specific binding, fusionproteins comprising an antigen binding portion, and any other modifiedconfiguration of the immunoglobulin molecule that comprises an antigenrecognition site. Antigen binding portions include, for example, Fab,Fab′, F(ab′)₂, Fd, Fv, domain antibodies (dAbs, e.g., shark and camelidantibodies), fragments including complementarity determining regions(CDRs), single chain variable fragment antibodies (scFv), maxibodies,minibodies, intrabodies, diabodies, triabodies, tetrabodies, v-NAR andbis-scFv, and polypeptides that contain at least a portion of animmunoglobulin that is sufficient to confer specific antigen binding tothe polypeptide. An antibody includes an antibody of any class, such asIgG, IgA, or IgM (or sub-class thereof), and the antibody need not be ofany particular class. Depending on the antibody amino acid sequence ofthe constant region of its heavy chains, immunoglobulins can be assignedto different classes. There are five major classes of immunoglobulins:IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, and IgM, and several of these may be further dividedinto subclasses (isotypes), e.g., IgG₁, IgG₂, IgG₃, IgG₄, IgA₁ and IgA₂.The heavy-chain constant regions that correspond to the differentclasses of immunoglobulins are called alpha, delta, epsilon, gamma, andmu, respectively. The subunit structures and three-dimensionalconfigurations of different classes of immunoglobulins are well known.

A “variable region” of an antibody refers to the variable region of theantibody light chain or the variable region of the antibody heavy chain,either alone or in combination. As known in the art, the variableregions of the heavy and light chains each consist of four frameworkregions (FRs) connected by three complementarity determining regions(CDRs) also known as hypervariable regions, and contribute to theformation of the antigen binding site of antibodies. If variants of asubject variable region are desired, particularly with substitution inamino acid residues outside of a CDR region (i.e., in the frameworkregion), appropriate amino acid substitution, preferably, conservativeamino acid substitution, can be identified by comparing the subjectvariable region to the variable regions of other antibodies whichcontain CDR1 and CDR2 sequences in the same canonincal class as thesubject variable region (Chothia and Lesk, J Mol Biol 196(4): 901-917,1987).

In certain embodiments, definitive delineation of a CDR andidentification of residues comprising the binding site of an antibody isaccomplished by solving the structure of the antibody and/or solving thestructure of the antibody-ligand complex. In certain embodiments, thatcan be accomplished by any of a variety of techniques known to thoseskilled in the art, such as X-ray crystallography. In certainembodiments, various methods of analysis can be employed to identify orapproximate the CDR regions. In certain embodiments, various methods ofanalysis can be employed to identify or approximate the CDR regions.Examples of such methods include, but are not limited to, the Kabatdefinition, the Chothia definition, the AbM definition, the contactdefinition, and the conformational definition.

The Kabat definition is a standard for numbering the residues in anantibody and is typically used to identify CDR regions. See, e.g.,Johnson & Wu, 2000, Nucleic Acids Res., 28: 214-8. The Chothiadefinition is similar to the Kabat definition, but the Chothiadefinition takes into account positions of certain structural loopregions. See, e.g., Chothia et al., 1986, J. Mol. Biol., 196: 901-17;Chothia et al., 1989, Nature, 342: 877-83. The AbM definition uses anintegrated suite of computer programs produced by Oxford Molecular Groupthat model antibody structure. See, e.g., Martin et al., 1989, Proc NatlAcad Sci (USA), 86:9268-9272; “ABM™, A Computer Program for ModelingVariable Regions of Antibodies,” Oxford, UK; Oxford Molecular, Ltd. TheAbM definition models the tertiary structure of an antibody from primarysequence using a combination of knowledge databases and ab initiomethods, such as those described by Samudrala et al., 1999, “Ab InitioProtein Structure Prediction Using a Combined Hierarchical Approach,” inPROTEINS, Structure, Function and Genetics Suppl., 3:194-198. Thecontact definition is based on an analysis of the available complexcrystal structures. See, e.g., MacCallum et al., 1996, J. Mol. Biol.,5:732-45. In another approach, referred to herein as the “conformationaldefinition” of CDRs, the positions of the CDRs may be identified as theresidues that make enthalpic contributions to antigen binding. See,e.g., Makabe et al., 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry,283:1156-1166. Still other CDR boundary definitions may not strictlyfollow one of the above approaches, but will nonetheless overlap with atleast a portion of the Kabat CDRs, although they may be shortened orlengthened in light of prediction or experimental findings thatparticular residues or groups of residues do not significantly impactantigen binding. As used herein, a CDR may refer to CDRs defined by anyapproach known in the art, including combinations of approaches. Themethods used herein may utilize CDRs defined according to any of theseapproaches. For any given embodiment containing more than one CDR, theCDRs may be defined in accordance with any of Kabat, Chothia, extended,AbM, contact, and/or conformational definitions.

As known in the art, a “constant region” of an antibody refers to theconstant region of the antibody light chain or the constant region ofthe antibody heavy chain, either alone or in combination.

As used herein, “monoclonal antibody” refers to an antibody obtainedfrom a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies, i.e., theindividual antibodies comprising the population are identical except forpossible naturally-occurring mutations that may be present in minoramounts. Monoclonal antibodies are highly specific, being directedagainst a single antigenic site. Furthermore, in contrast to polyclonalantibody preparations, which typically include different antibodiesdirected against different determinants (epitopes), each monoclonalantibody is directed against a single determinant on the antigen. Themodifier “monoclonal” indicates the character of the antibody as beingobtained from a substantially homogeneous population of antibodies, andis not to be construed as requiring production of the antibody by anyparticular method. For example, the monoclonal antibodies to be used inaccordance with the present invention may be made by the hybridomamethod first described by Kohler and Milstein, 1975, Nature 256:495, ormay be made by recombinant DNA methods such as described in U.S. Pat.No. 4,816,567. The monoclonal antibodies may also be isolated from phagelibraries generated using the techniques described in McCafferty et al.,1990, Nature 348:552-554, for example. As used herein, “humanized”antibody refers to forms of non-human (e.g. murine) antibodies that arechimeric immunoglobulins, immunoglobulin chains, or fragments thereof(such as Fv, Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)₂ or other antigen-binding subsequences ofantibodies) that contain minimal sequence derived from non-humanimmunoglobulin. Preferably, humanized antibodies are humanimmunoglobulins (recipient antibody) in which residues from a CDR of therecipient are replaced by residues from a CDR of a non-human species(donor antibody) such as mouse, rat, or rabbit having the desiredspecificity, affinity, and capacity. . The humanized antibody maycomprise residues that are found neither in the recipient antibody norin the imported CDR or framework sequences, but are included to furtherrefine and optimize antibody performance.

A “human antibody” is one which possesses an amino acid sequence whichcorresponds to that of an antibody produced by a human and/or has beenmade using any of the techniques for making human antibodies asdisclosed herein. This definition of a human antibody specificallyexcludes a humanized antibody comprising non-human antigen bindingresidues.

The term “chimeric antibody” is intended to refer to antibodies in whichthe variable region sequences are derived from one species and theconstant region sequences are derived from another species, such as anantibody in which the variable region sequences are derived from a mouseantibody and the constant region sequences are derived from a humanantibody.

The term “epitope” refers to that portion of a molecule capable of beingrecognized by and bound by an antibody at one or more of the antibody'santigen-binding regions. Epitopes often consist of a surface grouping ofmolecules such as amino acids or sugar side chains and have specificthree-dimensional structural characteristics as well as specific chargecharacteristics. In some embodiments, the epitope can be a proteinepitope. Protein epitopes can be linear or conformational. In a linearepitope, all of the points of interaction between the protein and theinteracting molecule (such as an antibody) occur linearly along theprimary amino acid sequence of the protein. A “nonlinear epitope” or“conformational epitope” comprises noncontiguous polypeptides (or aminoacids) within the antigenic protein to which an antibody specific to theepitope binds. The term “antigenic epitope” as used herein, is definedas a portion of an antigen to which an antibody can specifically bind asdetermined by any method well known in the art, for example, byconventional immunoassays. Once a desired epitope on an antigen isdetermined, it is possible to generate antibodies to that epitope, e.g.,using the techniques described in the present specification.Alternatively, during the discovery process, the generation andcharacterization of antibodies may elucidate information about desirableepitopes. From this information, it is then possible to competitivelyscreen antibodies for binding to the same epitope. An approach toachieve this is to conduct competition and cross-competition studies tofind antibodies that compete or cross-compete with one another forbinding to glucagon receptor, e.g., the antibodies compete for bindingto the antigen. A “functional epitope” comprises

As used herein, the term “glucagon receptor” refers to any form ofglucagon receptor and variants thereof that retain at least part of theactivity of glucagon receptor. Unless indicated differently, such as byspecific reference to human glucagon receptor, glucagon receptorincludes all mammalian species of native sequence glucagon receptor,e.g., human, canine, feline, equine, and bovine. One exemplary humanglucagon receptor is found as Uniprot Accession Number P47871 (SEQ IDNO: 1).

The term “antagonist antibody” refers to an antibody that binds to atarget and prevents or reduces the biological effect of that target. Insome embodiments, the term can denote an antibody that prevents thetarget, e.g., glucagon receptor, to which it is bound from performing abiological function.

As used herein, an “anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody” refersto an antibody that is able to inhibit glucagon receptor biologicalactivity and/or downstream events(s) mediated by glucagon receptor.Anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodies encompass antibodies thatblock, antagonize, suppress or reduce (to any degree includingsignificantly) glucagon receptor biological activity, includingdownstream events mediated by glucagon receptor, such glucagon bindingand downstream signaling, adenylate cyclase activation, increased levelsof intracellular cAMP, glycogenolysis stimulation, gluconeogenesisactivation, glycogenesis inhibition, glycolysis inhibition, and hepaticglucose production. For purposes of the present invention, it will beexplicitly understood that the term “anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody” (interchangeably termed “antagonist glucagon receptorantibody”, “antagonist anti-glucagon receptor antibody” or “glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody”) encompasses all the previously identifiedterms, titles, and functional states and characteristics whereby theglucagon receptor itself, a glucagon receptor biological activity(including but not limited to its ability to bind glucagon, increaseintracellular cAMP, stimulate glycogenolysis, activate gluconeogenesis,and promote relase of hepatic glucose), or the consequences of thebiological activity, are substantially nullified, decreased, orneutralized in any meaningful degree. In some embodiments, ananti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody binds glucagon receptor andlowers plasma glucose levels. Examples of anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibodies are provided herein. The terms “polypeptide”,“oligopeptide”, “peptide” and “protein” are used interchangeably hereinto refer to chains of amino acids of any length. The chain may be linearor branched, it may comprise modified amino acids, and/or may beinterrupted by non-amino acids. The terms also encompass an amino acidchain that has been modified naturally or by intervention; for example,disulfide bond formation, glycosylation, lipidation, acetylation,phosphorylation, or any other manipulation or modification, such asconjugation with a labeling component. Also included within thedefinition are, for example, polypeptides containing one or more analogsof an amino acid (including, for example, unnatural amino acids, etc.),as well as other modifications known in the art. It is understood thatthe polypeptides can occur as single chains or associated chains.

As known in the art, “polynucleotide,” or “nucleic acid,” as usedinterchangeably herein, refer to chains of nucleotides of any length,and include DNA and RNA. The nucleotides can be deoxyribonucleotides,ribonucleotides, modified nucleotides or bases, and/or their analogs, orany substrate that can be incorporated into a chain by DNA or RNApolymerase. A polynucleotide may comprise modified nucleotides, such asmethylated nucleotides and their analogs. If present, modification tothe nucleotide structure may be imparted before or after assembly of thechain. The sequence of nucleotides may be interrupted by non-nucleotidecomponents. A polynucleotide may be further modified afterpolymerization, such as by conjugation with a labeling component. Othertypes of modifications include, for example, “caps”, substitution of oneor more of the naturally occurring nucleotides with an analog,internucleotide modifications such as, for example, those with unchargedlinkages (e.g., methyl phosphonates, phosphotriesters, phosphoamidates,carbamates, etc.) and with charged linkages (e.g., phosphorothioates,phosphorodithioates, etc.), those containing pendant moieties, such as,for example, proteins (e.g., nucleases, toxins, antibodies, signalpeptides, poly-L-lysine, etc.), those with intercalators (e.g.,acridine, psoralen, etc.), those containing chelators (e.g., metals,radioactive metals, boron, oxidative metals, etc.), those containingalkylators, those with modified linkages (e.g., alpha anomeric nucleicacids, etc.), as well as unmodified forms of the polynucleotide(s).Further, any of the hydroxyl groups ordinarily present in the sugars maybe replaced, for example, by phosphonate groups, phosphate groups,protected by standard protecting groups, or activated to prepareadditional linkages to additional nucleotides, or may be conjugated tosolid supports. The 5′ and 3′ terminal OH can be phosphorylated orsubstituted with amines or organic capping group moieties of from 1 to20 carbon atoms. Other hydroxyls may also be derivatized to standardprotecting groups. Polynucleotides can also contain analogous forms ofribose or deoxyribose sugars that are generally known in the art,including, for example, 2′-O-methyl-, 2′-O-allyl, 2′-fluoro- or2′-azido-ribose, carbocyclic sugar analogs, alpha- or beta-anomericsugars, epimeric sugars such as arabinose, xyloses or lyxoses, pyranosesugars, furanose sugars, sedoheptuloses, acyclic analogs and abasicnucleoside analogs such as methyl riboside. One or more phosphodiesterlinkages may be replaced by alternative linking groups. Thesealternative linking groups include, but are not limited to, embodimentswherein phosphate is replaced by P(O)S(“thioate”), P(S)S (“dithioate”),(O)NR₂ (“amidate”), P(O)R, P(O)OR′, CO or CH₂ (“formacetal”), in whicheach R or R′ is independently H or substituted or unsubstituted alkyl(1-20 C) optionally containing an ether (—O—) linkage, aryl, alkenyl,cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl or araldyl. Not all linkages in apolynucleotide need be identical. The preceding description applies toall polynucleotides referred to herein, including RNA and DNA.

As used herein, an antibody “interacts with” glucagon receptor when theequilibrium dissociation constant is equal to or less than 20 nM,preferably less than about 6 nM, more preferably less than about 1 nM,most preferably less than about 0.2 nM, as measured by the methodsdisclosed herein in Example 1.

An antibody that “preferentially binds” or “specifically binds” (usedinterchangeably herein) to an epitope is a term well understood in theart, and methods to determine such specific or preferential binding arealso well known in the art. A molecule is said to exhibit “specificbinding” or “preferential binding” if it reacts or associates morefrequently, more rapidly, with greater duration and/or with greateraffinity with a particular cell or substance than it does withalternative cells or substances. An antibody “specifically binds” or“preferentially binds” to a target if it binds with greater affinity,avidity, more readily, and/or with greater duration than it binds toother substances. For example, an antibody that specifically orpreferentially binds to a glucagon receptor epitope is an antibody thatbinds this epitope with greater affinity, avidity, more readily, and/orwith greater duration than it binds to other glucagon receptor epitopesor non-glucagon receptor epitopes. It is also understood by reading thisdefinition that, for example, an antibody (or moiety or epitope) thatspecifically or preferentially binds to a first target may or may notspecifically or preferentially bind to a second target. As such,“specific binding” or “preferential binding” does not necessarilyrequire (although it can include) exclusive binding. Generally, but notnecessarily, reference to binding means preferential binding.

As used herein, “substantially pure” refers to material which is atleast 50% pure (i.e., free from contaminants), more preferably, at least90% pure, more preferably, at least 95% pure, yet more preferably, atleast 98% pure, and most preferably, at least 99% pure.

A “host cell” includes an individual cell or cell culture that can be orhas been a recipient for vector(s) for incorporation of polynucleotideinserts. Host cells include progeny of a single host cell, and theprogeny may not necessarily be completely identical (in morphology or ingenomic DNA complement) to the original parent cell due to natural,accidental, or deliberate mutation. A host cell includes cellstransfected in vivo with a polynucleotide(s) of this invention.

As known in the art, the term “Fc region” is used to define a C-terminalregion of an immunoglobulin heavy chain. The “Fc region” may be a nativesequence Fc region or a variant Fc region. Although the boundaries ofthe Fc region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain might vary, the human IgGheavy chain Fc region is usually defined to stretch from an amino acidresidue at position Cys226, or from Pro230, to the carboxyl-terminusthereof. The numbering of the residues in the Fc region is that of theEU index as in Kabat. Kabat et al., Sequences of Proteins ofImmunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, NationalInstitutes of Health, Bethesda, Md., 1991. The Fc region of animmunoglobulin generally comprises two constant domains, CH2 and CH3. Asis known in the art, an Fc region can be present in dimer or monomericform.

As used in the art, “Fc receptor” and “FcR” describe a receptor thatbinds to the Fc region of an antibody. The preferred FcR is a nativesequence human FcR. Moreover, a preferred FcR is one which binds an IgGantibody (a gamma receptor) and includes receptors of the FcγRI, FcγRII,and FcγRIII subclasses, including allelic variants and alternativelyspliced forms of these receptors. FcγRII receptors include

FcγRIIA (an “activating receptor”) and FcγRIIB (an “inhibitingreceptor”), which have similar amino acid sequences that differprimarily in the cytoplasmic domains thereof. FcRs are reviewed inRavetch and Kinet, 1991, Ann. Rev. Immunol., 9:457-92; Capel et al.,1994, Immunomethods, 4:25-34; and de Haas et al., 1995, J. Lab. Clin.Med., 126:330-41. “FcR” also includes the neonatal receptor, FcRn, whichis responsible for the transfer of maternal IgGs to the fetus (Guyer etal., 1976, J. Immunol., 117:587; and Kim et al., 1994, J. Immunol.,24:249).

The term “compete”, as used herein with regard to an antibody, meansthat a first antibody, or an antigen-binding portion thereof, binds toan epitope in a manner sufficiently similar to the binding of a secondantibody, or an antigen-binding portion thereof, such that the result ofbinding of the first antibody with its cognate epitope is detectablydecreased in the presence of the second antibody compared to the bindingof the first antibody in the absence of the second antibody. Thealternative, where the binding of the second antibody to its epitope isalso detectably decreased in the presence of the first antibody, can,but need not be the case. That is, a first antibody can inhibit thebinding of a second antibody to its epitope without that second antibodyinhibiting the binding of the first antibody to its respective epitope.However, where each antibody detectably inhibits the binding of theother antibody with its cognate epitope or ligand, whether to the same,greater, or lesser extent, the antibodies are said to “cross-compete”with each other for binding of their respective epitope(s). Bothcompeting and cross-competing antibodies are encompassed by the presentinvention. Regardless of the mechanism by which such competition orcross-competition occurs (e.g., steric hindrance, conformational change,or binding to a common epitope, or portion thereof), the skilled artisanwould appreciate, based upon the teachings provided herein, that suchcompeting and/or cross-competing antibodies are encompassed and can beuseful for the methods disclosed herein.

A “functional Fc region” possesses at least one effector function of anative sequence Fc region. Exemplary “effector functions” include C1qbinding; complement dependent cytotoxicity; Fc receptor binding;antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity; phagocytosis;down-regulation of cell surface receptors (e.g. B cell receptor), etc.Such effector functions generally require the Fc region to be combinedwith a binding domain (e.g. an antibody variable domain) and can beassessed using various assays known in the art for evaluating suchantibody effector functions.

A “native sequence Fc region” comprises an amino acid sequence identicalto the amino acid sequence of an Fc region found in nature. A “variantFc region” comprises an amino acid sequence which differs from that of anative sequence Fc region by virtue of at least one amino acidmodification, yet retains at least one effector function of the nativesequence Fc region. Preferably, the variant Fc region has at least oneamino acid substitution compared to a native sequence Fc region or tothe Fc region of a parent polypeptide, e.g. from about one to about tenamino acid substitutions, and preferably, from about one to about fiveamino acid substitutions in a native sequence Fc region or in the Fcregion of the parent polypeptide. The variant Fc region herein willpreferably possess at least about 80% sequence identity with a nativesequence Fc region and/or with an Fc region of a parent polypeptide, andmost preferably, at least about 90% sequence identity therewith, morepreferably, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%,at least about 98%, at least about 99% sequence identity therewith.

As used herein, “treatment” is an approach for obtaining beneficial ordesired clinical results. For purposes of this invention, beneficial ordesired clinical results include, but are not limited to, one or more ofthe following: lowered blood glucose level, improved glucose clearance(improved glucose tolerance), and reduced incidence or amelioration ofaberrant plasma glucose levels resulting from T1D, T2D, hyperglycemia,impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia,obesity, nephropathy, retinopathy, cataracts, stroke, atherosclerosis,impaired wound healing, diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperglycemichyperosmolar syndrome, perioperative hyperglycemia, hyperglycemia in theintensive care unit patient, insulin resistance syndrome, and metabolicsyndrome.

“Ameliorating” means a lessening or improvement of one or more symptomsas compared to not administering an anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody. “Ameliorating” also includes shortening or reduction induration of a symptom.

As used herein, an “effective dosage” or “effective amount” of drug,compound, or pharmaceutical composition is an amount sufficient toeffect any one or more beneficial or desired results. In more specificaspects, an effective amount prevents, alleviates or amelioratessymptoms of disease, and/or prolongs the survival of the subject beingtreated. For prophylactic use, beneficial or desired results includeeliminating or reducing the risk, lessening the severity, or delayingthe outset of the disease, including biochemical, histological and/orbehavioral symptoms of the disease, its complications and intermediatepathological phenotypes presenting during development of the disease.For therapeutic use, beneficial or desired results include clinicalresults such as reducing one or more symptoms of T1D, T2D,hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, impaired fasting glucose, impairedglucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, or metabolic syndrome, decreasing thedose of other medications required to treat the disease, enhancing theeffect of another medication, and/or delaying the progression of thedisease of patients. An effective dosage can be administered in one ormore administrations. For purposes of this invention, an effectivedosage of drug, compound, or pharmaceutical composition is an amountsufficient to accomplish prophylactic or therapeutic treatment eitherdirectly or indirectly. As is understood in the clinical context, aneffective dosage of a drug, compound, or pharmaceutical composition mayor may not be achieved in conjunction with another drug, compound, orpharmaceutical composition. Thus, an “effective dosage” may beconsidered in the context of administering one or more therapeuticagents, and a single agent may be considered to be given in an effectiveamount if, in conjunction with one or more other agents, a desirableresult may be or is achieved.

An “individual” or a “subject” is a mammal, more preferably, a human.Mammals also include, but are not limited to, farm animals (e.g., cows,pigs, horses, chickens, etc.), sport animals, pets, primates, horses,dogs, cats, mice and rats.

As used herein, “vector” means a construct, which is capable ofdelivering, and, preferably, expressing, one or more gene(s) orsequence(s) of interest in a host cell. Examples of vectors include, butare not limited to, viral vectors, naked DNA or RNA expression vectors,plasmid, cosmid or phage vectors, DNA or RNA expression vectorsassociated with cationic condensing agents, DNA or RNA expressionvectors encapsulated in liposomes, and certain eukaryotic cells, such asproducer cells.

As used herein, “expression control sequence” means a nucleic acidsequence that directs transcription of a nucleic acid. An expressioncontrol sequence can be a promoter, such as a constitutive or aninducible promoter, or an enhancer. The expression control sequence isoperably linked to the nucleic acid sequence to be transcribed.

As used herein, “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” or “pharmaceuticalacceptable excipient” includes any material which, when combined with anactive ingredient, allows the ingredient to retain biological activityand is non-reactive with the subject's immune system. Examples include,but are not limited to, any of the standard pharmaceutical carriers suchas a phosphate buffered saline solution, water, emulsions such asoil/water emulsion, and various types of wetting agents. Preferreddiluents for aerosol or parenteral administration are phosphate bufferedsaline (PBS) or normal (0.9%) saline. Compositions comprising suchcarriers are formulated by well known conventional methods (see, forexample, Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th edition, A. Gennaro,ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., 1990; and Remington, The Scienceand Practice of Pharmacy 20th Ed. Mack Publishing, 2000).

The term “k_(on)”, as used herein, refers to the rate constant forassociation of an antibody to an antigen. Specifically, the rateconstants (k_(on) and k_(off)) and equilibrium dissociation constantsare measured using full-length antibodies and/or Fab antibody fragments(i.e. univalent) and glucagon receptor.

The term “k_(off)”, as used herein, refers to the rate constant fordissociation of an antibody from the antibody/antigen complex.

The term “K_(D)”, as used herein, refers to the equilibrium dissociationconstant of an antibody-antigen interaction.

Reference to “about” a value or parameter herein includes (anddescribes) embodiments that are directed to that value or parameter perse. For example, description referring to “about X” includes descriptionof “X.” Numeric ranges are inclusive of the numbers defining the range.It is understood that wherever embodiments are described herein with thelanguage “comprising,” otherwise analogous embodiments described interms of “consisting of” and/or “consisting essentially of” are alsoprovided.

Where aspects or embodiments of the invention are described in terms ofa Markush group or other grouping of alternatives, the present inventionencompasses not only the entire group listed as a whole, but each memberof the group individually and all possible subgroups of the main group,but also the main group absent one or more of the group members. Thepresent invention also envisages the explicit exclusion of one or moreof any of the group members in the claimed invention.

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used hereinhave the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill inthe art to which this invention belongs. In case of conflict, thepresent specification, including definitions, will control. Throughoutthis specification and claims, the word “comprise,” or variations suchas “comprises” or “comprising” will be understood to imply the inclusionof a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of anyother integer or group of integers. Unless otherwise required bycontext, singular terms shall include pluralities and plural terms shallinclude the singular. Any example(s) following the term “e.g.” or “forexample” is not meant to be exhaustive or limiting.

Exemplary methods and materials are described herein, although methodsand materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can alsobe used in the practice or testing of the present invention. Thematerials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intendedto be limiting.

Methods for Preventing or Treating Conditions Mediated by GlucagonReceptor

Provided herein is a method of lowering blood glucose in an individualin need thereof, the method comprising administering a therapeuticallyeffective amount of an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody to theindividual.

Also provided is a method of improving glucose tolerance in anindividual in need thereof, the method comprising administering atherapeutically effective amount of an anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody to the individual.

Also provided is a method for treating or preventing a conditionmediated by glucagon receptor in an individual, the method comprisingadministering to an individual in need thereof an effective amount of ananti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody. In some embodiments, thecondition is T1 D. In other embodiments, the condition is T2D. In otherembodiments, the condition is hyperglycemia. In other embodiments, thecondition is hyperinsulinemia. In other embodiments, the condition isimpaired fasting glucose. In other embodiments, the condition isimpaired glucose tolerance. In other embodiments, the condition isdyslipidemia. In other embodiments, the condition is metabolic syndrome.

In some embodiments, therapeutic administration of the anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody advantageously results in lower serumglucose. Preferably, serum glucose is at least about 10% or 15% lowerthan before administration. More preferably, serum glucose is at leastabout 20% lower than before administration of the antibody. Yet morepreferably, serum glucose is at least 30% lower than beforeadministration of the antibody. Advantageously, serum glucose is atleast 40% lower than before administration of the antibody. Moreadvantageously, serum glucose is at least 50% lower than beforeadministration of the antibody. Very preferably, serum glucose is atleast 60% lower than before administration of the antibody. Mostpreferably, serum glucose is at least 70% lower than beforeadministration of the antibody.

An individual suffering from or at risk for T2D can be treated with ananti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody. An individual suitable foranti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody therapy is selected usingclinical criteria and prognostic indicators of T2D that are well knownin the art. Assessment of T2D severity may be performed based on testsknown in the art, including, for example, fasting plasma glucose test,casual plasma glucose test, oral glucose tolerance test, two-hourpostprandial test, random blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin (A1C) test,urine test, dilated eye exam, and foot exam. In some embodiments,ameliorating, controlling, reducing incidence of, or delaying thedevelopment or progression of T2D and/or symptoms of T2D is measured byfasting plasma glucose test.

In some embodiments, therapeutic administration of the anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody advantageously results in reduced incidenceand/or amelioration of one or more symptoms of T2D including, forexample, hyperglycemia, increased thirst, increased hunger, dry mouth,frequent urination, unexplained weight loss, fatigue, blurred vision,headaches, loss of consciousness, retinopathy, kidney damage, poor bloodcirculation, nerve damage, increased infections, ulcers, nausea,vomiting, and diarrhea.

An individual suffering from or at risk for T1D can be treated with ananti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody. An individual suitable foranti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody therapy is selected usingclinical criteria and prognostic indicators of T1D that are well knownin the art. Assessment of T1D severity may be performed based on testsknown in the art, including, for example, A1C test, fasting plasmaglucose test, oral glucose tolerance test, random plasma glucose test,fructosamine test, testing for ketones, and urine test. In someembodiments, ameliorating, controlling, reducing incidence of, ordelaying the development or progression of T1D and/or symptoms of T1D ismeasured by fasting plasma glucose test.

In some embodiments, therapeutic administration of the anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody advantageously results in reduced incidenceand/or amelioration of one or more symptoms of T1D including, forexample, hyperglycemia, increased thirst, increased hunger, dry mouth,frequent urination, unexplained weight loss, fatigue, blurred vision,headaches, loss of consciousness, retinopathy, kidney damage, poor bloodcirculation, nerve damage, increased infections, ulcers, nausea,vomiting, diarrhea, tingling, numbness, pain in the hands or feet, dryskin, itchy skin, and slow to heal sores.

With respect to all methods described herein, reference to anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibodies also includes compositions comprising oneor more additional agents. These compositions may further comprisesuitable excipients, such as pharmaceutically acceptable excipientsincluding buffers, which are well known in the art. The presentinvention can be used alone or in combination with other methods oftreatment.

The anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody can be administered to anindividual via any suitable route. It should be apparent to a personskilled in the art that the examples described herein are not intendedto be limiting but to be illustrative of the techniques available.Accordingly, in some embodiments, the anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody is administered to an individual in accord with known methods,such as intravenous administration, e.g., as a bolus or by continuousinfusion over a period of time, by intramuscular, intraperitoneal,intracerebrospinal, transdermal, subcutaneous, intra-articular,sublingually, intrasynovial, via insufflation, intrathecal, oral,inhalation or topical routes. Administration can be systemic, e.g.,intravenous administration, or localized. Commercially availablenebulizers for liquid formulations, including jet nebulizers andultrasonic nebulizers are useful for administration. Liquid formulationscan be directly nebulized and lyophilized powder can be nebulized afterreconstitution. Alternatively, anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody can be aerosolized using a fluorocarbon formulation and ametered dose inhaler, or inhaled as a lyophilized and milled powder.

In some embodiments, an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody isadministered via site-specific or targeted local delivery techniques.Examples of site-specific or targeted local delivery techniques includevarious implantable depot sources of the anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody or local delivery catheters, such as infusioncatheters, indwelling catheters, or needle catheters, synthetic grafts,adventitial wraps, shunts and stents or other implantable devices, sitespecific carriers, direct injection, or direct application. See, e.g.,PCT Publication No. WO 00/53211 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,981,568.

Various formulations of an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodymay be used for administration. In some embodiments, the anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody may be administered neat. In someembodiments, anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody and apharmaceutically acceptable excipient may be in various formulations.Pharmaceutically acceptable excipients are known in the art, and arerelatively inert substances that facilitate administration of apharmacologically effective substance. For example, an excipient cangive form or consistency, or act as a diluent. Suitable excipientsinclude but are not limited to stabilizing agents, wetting andemulsifying agents, salts for varying osmolarity, encapsulating agents,buffers, and skin penetration enhancers. Excipients as well asformulations for parenteral and nonparenteral drug delivery are setforth in Remington, The Science and Practice of Pharmacy 20th Ed. MackPublishing, 2000.

In some embodiments, these agents are formulated for administration byinjection (e.g., intraperitoneally, intravenously, subcutaneously,intramuscularly, etc.). Accordingly, these agents can be combined withpharmaceutically acceptable vehicles such as saline, Ringer's solution,dextrose solution, and the like. The particular dosage regimen, i.e.,dose, timing and repetition, will depend on the particular individualand that individual's medical history.

An anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody can be administered usingany suitable method, including by injection (e.g., intraperitoneally,intravenously, subcutaneously, intramuscularly, etc.). Anti-glucagonreceptor antibodies can also be administered topically or viainhalation, as described herein. Generally, for administration ofanti-glucagon receptor antibodies, an initial candidate dosage can beabout 2 mg/kg. For the purpose of the present invention, a typical dailydosage might range from about any of 3 pg/kg to 30 pg/kg to 300 pg/kg to3 mg/kg, to 30 mg/kg, to 100 mg/kg or more, depending on the factorsmentioned above. For example, dosage of about 1 mg/kg, about 2.5 mg/kg,about 5 mg/kg, about 10 mg/kg, and about 25 mg/kg may be used. Forrepeated administrations over several days or longer, depending on thecondition, the treatment is sustained until a desired suppression ofsymptoms occurs or until sufficient therapeutic levels are achieved, forexample, to reduce symptoms associated with glucagon-related disorders.The progress of this therapy is easily monitored by conventionaltechniques and assays. The dosing regimen (including the anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody used) can vary over time.

For the purpose of the present invention, the appropriate dosage of ananti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody will depend on theanti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody (or compositions thereof)employed, the type and severity of symptoms to be treated, whether theagent is administered for preventive or therapeutic purposes, previoustherapy, the patient's clinical history and response to the agent, thepatient's blood glucose levels, the patient's synthesis and clearancerate for glucose, the patient's clearance rate for the administeredagent, and the discretion of the attending physician. Typically theclinician will administer an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodyuntil a dosage is reached that achieves the desired result. Dose and/orfrequency can vary over course of treatment. Empirical considerations,such as the half-life, generally will contribute to the determination ofthe dosage. For example, antibodies that are compatible with the humanimmune system, such as humanized antibodies or fully human antibodies,may be used to prolong half-life of the antibody and to prevent theantibody being attacked by the host's immune system. Frequency ofadministration may be determined and adjusted over the course oftherapy, and is generally, but not necessarily, based on treatmentand/or suppression and/or amelioration and/or delay of symptoms.Alternatively, sustained continuous release formulations ofanti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodies may be appropriate. Variousformulations and devices for achieving sustained release are known inthe art.

In one embodiment, dosages for an antagonist antibody may be determinedempirically in individuals who have been given one or moreadministration(s) of an antagonist antibody. Individuals are givenincremental dosages of an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody. Toassess efficacy, an indicator of the disease can be followed.

Administration of an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody inaccordance with the method in the present invention can be continuous orintermittent, depending, for example, upon the recipient's physiologicalcondition, whether the purpose of the administration is therapeutic orprophylactic, and other factors known to skilled practitioners. Theadministration of an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody may beessentially continuous over a preselected period of time or may be in aseries of spaced doses.

In some embodiments, more than one anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody may be present. At least one, at least two, at least three, atleast four, at least five different, or more antagonist antibodies canbe present. Generally, those anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibodies may have complementary activities that do not adverselyaffect each other. An anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody canalso be used in conjunction with other antibodies and/or othertherapies. An anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody can also beused in conjunction with other agents that serve to enhance and/orcomplement the effectiveness of the agents.

In some embodiments, the anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody maybe administered in combination with the administration of one or moreadditional therapeutic agents. These include, but are not limited to,the administration of mTOR inhibitors, meglitinides (e.g., repaglinide,nateglinide, etc.), sulfonylureas (e.g., glipizide, glimepiride,glyburide, etc.), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (e.g.,saxagliptin, sitagliptin, linagliptin, etc.), biguanides (e.g.,metformin, etc.), thiazolidinediones (e.g., rosiglitazone, pioglitazone,etc.), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (e.g., acarbose, voglibose,miglitol, etc.), amylin mimetics (e.g., symlin), and incretic mimetics(e.g., EXENATIDE®, liraglutide, etc.). Additional treatments includeinjectable treatments such as SYMLIN® (pram lintide).

In some embodiments, an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody isused in conjunction with one or more mTOR inhibitors such as, forexample without limitation, rapamycin, sirolimus, temsirolimus,everolimus, ridaforolimus, and/or an ATP-competitive mTOR kinaseinhibitor (TKI). In some embodiments, the TKI is Torin1, Torin 2, PP242,PP30, KU0063794, WAY-600, WYE-687, WYE-354, OSI-027, AZD-8055,KU-BMCL-200908069-1, Wyeth-BMCL-200908069-2, XL-388, INK-128, and/orAZD-2014. In some embodiments, an anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody is used in conjunction with metformin, thiazolidinedione,sulfonylurea, and/or disaccharide inhibitor. Alternatively, the therapymay precede or follow the other agent treatment by intervals rangingfrom minutes to weeks. In embodiments where the other agents and/or aproteins or polynucleotides are administered separately, one wouldgenerally ensure that a significant period of time did not expirebetween each delivery, such that the agent and the composition of thepresent invention would still be able to exert an advantageouslycombined effect on the subject. In such instances, it is contemplatedthat one may administer both modalities within about 12-24 h of eachother and, more preferably, within about 6-12 h of each other. In somesituations, it may be desirable to extend the time period foradministration significantly, however, where several days (2, 3, 4, 5, 6or 7) to several weeks (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8) lapse between therespective administrations.

In some embodiments, an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodycomposition comprises a second agent selected from the group consistingof non-sulfonylurea secretagogues, insulin, insulin analogs, exendin-4polypeptides, beta 3 adrenoceptor agonists, PPAR agonists, dipeptidylpeptidase IV inhibitors, statins and statin-containing combinations,inhibitors of cholesterol uptake and/or bile acid re-absorption,LDL-cholesterol antagonists, cholesteryl ester transfer proteinantagonists, endothelin receptor antagonists, growth hormoneantagonists, insulin sensitizers, amylin mimetics or agonists,cannabinoid receptor antagonists, glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists,melanocortins, and melanin-concentrating hormone receptor agonists.

Therapeutic formulations of the anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody used in accordance with the present invention are prepared forstorage by mixing an antibody having the desired degree of purity withoptional pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, excipients or stabilizers(Remington, The Science and Practice of Pharmacy 20th Ed. MackPublishing, 2000), in the form of lyophilized formulations or aqueoussolutions. Acceptable carriers, excipients, or stabilizers are nontoxicto recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed, and maycomprise buffers such as phosphate, citrate, and other organic acids;salts such as sodium chloride; antioxidants including ascorbic acid andmethionine; preservatives (such as octadecyldimethylbenzyl ammoniumchloride; hexamethonium chloride; benzalkonium chloride, benzethoniumchloride;

phenol, butyl or benzyl alcohol; alkyl parabens, such as methyl orpropyl paraben; catechol; resorcinol; cyclohexanol; 3-pentanol; andm-cresol); low molecular weight (less than about 10 residues)polypeptides; proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, orimmunoglobulins; hydrophilic polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone;amino acids such as glycine, glutamine, asparagine, histidine, arginine,or lysine; monosaccharides, disaccharides, and other carbohydratesincluding glucose, mannose, or dextrins; chelating agents such as EDTA;sugars such as sucrose, mannitol, trehalose or sorbitol; salt-formingcounter-ions such as sodium; metal complexes (e.g. Zn-proteincomplexes); and/or non-ionic surfactants such as TWEEN™, PLURONICS™ orpolyethylene glycol (PEG).

Liposomes containing the anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody areprepared by methods known in the art, such as described in Epstein, etal., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:3688 (1985); Hwang, et al., Proc.Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77:4030 (1980); and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,485,045 and4,544,545. Liposomes with enhanced circulation time are disclosed inU.S. Pat. No. 5,013,556. Particularly useful liposomes can be generatedby the reverse phase evaporation method with a lipid compositioncomprising phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and PEG-derivatizedphosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-PE). Liposomes are extruded throughfilters of defined pore size to yield liposomes with the desireddiameter.

The active ingredients may also be entrapped in microcapsules prepared,for example, by coacervation techniques or by interfacialpolymerization, for example, hydroxymethylcellulose orgelatin-microcapsules and poly-(methylmethacrylate) microcapsules,respectively, in colloidal drug delivery systems (for example,liposomes, albumin microspheres, microemulsions, nano-particles andnanocapsules) or in macroemulsions. Such techniques are disclosed inRemington, The Science and Practice of Pharmacy 20th Ed. Mack Publishing(2000).

Sustained-release preparations may be prepared. Suitable examples ofsustained-release preparations include semipermeable matrices of solidhydrophobic polymers containing the antibody, which matrices are in theform of shaped articles, e.g. films, or microcapsules. Examples ofsustained-release matrices include polyesters, hydrogels (for example,poly(2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate), or poly(vinylalcohol)), polylactides(U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919), copolymers of L-glutamic acid and 7ethyl-L-glutamate, non-degradable ethylene-vinyl acetate, degradablelactic acid-glycolic acid copolymers such as the LUPRON DEPOT™(injectable microspheres composed of lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymerand leuprolide acetate), sucrose acetate isobutyrate, andpoly-D-(−)-3-hydroxybutyric acid.

The formulations to be used for in vivo administration must be sterile.This is readily accomplished by, for example, filtration through sterilefiltration membranes. Therapeutic anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody compositions are generally placed into a container having asterile access port, for example, an intravenous solution bag or vialhaving a stopper pierceable by a hypodermic injection needle.

The compositions according to the present invention may be in unitdosage forms such as tablets, pills, capsules, powders, granules,solutions or suspensions, or suppositories, for oral, parenteral orrectal administration, or administration by inhalation or insufflation.

For preparing solid compositions such as tablets, the principal activeingredient is mixed with a pharmaceutical carrier, e.g. conventionaltableting ingredients such as corn starch, lactose, sucrose, sorbitol,talc, stearic acid, magnesium stearate, dicalcium phosphate or gums, andother pharmaceutical diluents, e.g. water, to form a solidpreformulation composition containing a homogeneous mixture of acompound of the present invention, or a non-toxic pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt thereof. When referring to these preformulationcompositions as homogeneous, it is meant that the active ingredient isdispersed evenly throughout the composition so that the composition maybe readily subdivided into equally effective unit dosage forms such astablets, pills and capsules. This solid preformulation composition isthen subdivided into unit dosage forms of the type described abovecontaining from about 0.1 to about 500 mg of the active ingredient ofthe present invention. The tablets or pills of the novel composition canbe coated or otherwise compounded to provide a dosage form affording theadvantage of prolonged action. For example, the tablet or pill cancomprise an inner dosage and an outer dosage component, the latter beingin the form of an envelope over the former. The two components can beseparated by an enteric layer that serves to resist disintegration inthe stomach and permits the inner component to pass intact into theduodenum or to be delayed in release. A variety of materials can be usedfor such enteric layers or coatings, such materials including a numberof polymeric acids and mixtures of polymeric acids with such materialsas shellac, cetyl alcohol and cellulose acetate.

Suitable surface-active agents include, in particular, non-ionic agents,such as polyoxyethylenesorbitans (e.g. Tween™ 20, 40, 60, 80 or 85) andother sorbitans (e.g. Span™ 20, 40, 60, 80 or 85). Compositions with asurface-active agent will conveniently comprise between 0.05 and 5%surface-active agent, and can be between 0.1 and 2.5%. It will beappreciated that other ingredients may be added, for example mannitol orother pharmaceutically acceptable vehicles, if necessary.

Suitable emulsions may be prepared using commercially available fatemulsions, such as Intralipid™, Liposyn™, Infonutrol™, Lipofundin™ andLipiphysan™. The active ingredient may be either dissolved in apre-mixed emulsion composition or alternatively it may be dissolved inan oil (e.g. soybean oil, safflower oil, cottonseed oil, sesame oil,corn oil or almond oil) and an emulsion formed upon mixing with aphospholipid (e.g. egg phospholipids, soybean phospholipids or soybeanlecithin) and water. It will be appreciated that other ingredients maybe added, for example glycerol or glucose, to adjust the tonicity of theemulsion. Suitable emulsions will typically contain up to 20% oil, forexample, between 5 and 20%. The fat emulsion can comprise fat dropletsbetween 0.1 and 1.0 μm, particularly 0.1 and 0.5 μm, and have a pH inthe range of 5.5 to 8.0.

The emulsion compositions can be those prepared by mixing ananti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody with Intralipid™ or thecomponents thereof (soybean oil, egg phospholipids, glycerol and water).

Compositions for inhalation or insufflation include solutions andsuspensions in pharmaceutically acceptable, aqueous or organic solvents,or mixtures thereof, and powders. The liquid or solid compositions maycontain suitable pharmaceutically acceptable excipients as set outabove. In some embodiments, the compositions are administered by theoral or nasal respiratory route for local or systemic effect.Compositions in preferably sterile pharmaceutically acceptable solventsmay be nebulised by use of gases. Nebulised solutions may be breatheddirectly from the nebulising device or the nebulising device may beattached to a face mask, tent or intermittent positive pressurebreathing machine. Solution, suspension or powder compositions may beadministered, preferably orally or nasally, from devices which deliverthe formulation in an appropriate manner.

Anti-Glucagon Receptor Antagonist Antibodies

The methods of the invention use an anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody that blocks, suppresses or reduces (including significantlyreduces) glucagon receptor biological activity, including downstreamevents mediated by glucagon receptor. An anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody should exhibit any one or more of the followingcharacteristics: (a) bind to glucagon receptor and block downstreamsignaling events; (b) block glucagon binding to glucagon receptor; (c)block adenylate cyclase activation; (d) block increase in intracellularcAMP; (e) block glycogenolysis; (f) block gluconeogenesis; and (g) blockhepatic glucose production.

For purposes of this invention, the antibody preferably reacts withglucagon receptor in a manner that inhibits glucagon receptor signalingfunction. In some embodiments, the anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody specifically recognizes primate glucagon receptor.

The antibodies useful in the present invention can encompass monoclonalantibodies, polyclonal antibodies, antibody fragments (e.g., Fab, Fab′,F(ab′)₂, Fv, Fc, etc.), chimeric antibodies, bispecific antibodies,heteroconjugate antibodies, single chain (ScFv), mutants thereof, fusionproteins comprising an antibody portion (e.g., a domain antibody),humanized antibodies, and any other modified configuration of theimmunoglobulin molecule that comprises an antigen recognition site ofthe required specificity, including glycosylation variants ofantibodies, amino acid sequence variants of antibodies, and covalentlymodified antibodies. The antibodies may be murine, rat, human, or anyother origin (including chimeric or humanized antibodies). In someembodiments, the anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody is amonoclonal antibody. In some embodiments, the antibody is a human orhumanized antibody.

The anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodies may be made by anymethod known in the art. General techniques for production of human andmouse antibodies are known in the art and/or are described herein.

Anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodies can be identified orcharacterized using methods known in the art, whereby reduction,amelioration, or neutralization of glucagon receptor biological activityis detected and/or measured. In some embodiments, an anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody is identified by incubating a candidateagent with glucagon receptor and monitoring binding and/or attendantreduction or neutralization of a biological activity of glucagonreceptor. The binding assay may be performed with, e.g., purifiedglucagon receptor polypeptide(s), or with cells naturally expressing(e.g., various strains), or transfected to express, glucagon receptorpolypeptide(s). In one embodiment, the binding assay is a competitivebinding assay, where the ability of a candidate antibody to compete witha known anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody for glucagon receptorbinding is evaluated. The assay may be performed in various formats,including the ELISA format. In some embodiments, an anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody is identified by incubating a candidateantibody with glucagon receptor and monitoring binding.

Following initial identification, the activity of a candidateanti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody can be further confirmed andrefined by bioassays, known to test the targeted biological activities.In some embodiments, an in vitro cell or cytotoxicity assay is used tofurther characterize a candidate anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody. For example, a candidate antibody is incubated with CHO cellsexpressing glucagon receptor, and glucagon is added, and intracellularcAMP levels are monitored. Alternatively, bioassays can be used toscreen candidates directly.

The anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodies of the inventionexhibit one or more of the following characteristics: (a) bind toglucagon receptor and block downstream signaling events; (b) blockglucagon binding to glucagon receptor; (c) block adenylate cyclaseactivation; (d) block increase in intracellular cAMP; (e) blockglycogenolysis; (f) block gluconeogenesis; and (g) block hepatic glucoseproduction. Preferably, anti-glucagon receptor antibodies have two ormore of these features. More preferably, the antibodies have three ormore of the features. More preferably, the antibodies have four or moreof the features. More preferably, the antibodies have five or more ofthe features. More preferably, the antibodies have six or more of thefeatures. Most preferably, the antibodies have all sevencharacteristics.

Anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodies may be characterized usingmethods well known in the art. For example, one method is to identifythe epitope to which it binds, or “epitope mapping.” There are manymethods known in the art for mapping and characterizing the location ofepitopes on proteins, including solving the crystal structure of anantibody-antigen complex, competition assays, gene fragment expressionassays, and synthetic peptide-based assays, as described, for example,in Chapter 11 of Harlow and Lane, Using Antibodies, a Laboratory Manual,Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1999.In an additional example, epitope mapping can be used to determine thesequence to which an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody binds.Epitope mapping is commercially available from various sources, forexample, Pepscan Systems (Edelhertweg 15, 8219 PH Lelystad, TheNetherlands). The epitope can be a linear epitope, i.e., contained in asingle stretch of amino acids, or a conformational epitope formed by athree-dimensional interaction of amino acids that may not necessarily becontained in a single stretch. Peptides of varying lengths (e.g., atleast 4-6 amino acids long) can be isolated or synthesized (e.g.,recombinantly) and used for binding assays with an anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody. In another example, the epitope to whichthe anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody binds can be determinedin a systematic screening by using overlapping peptides derived from theglucagon receptor sequence and determining binding by the anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody. According to the gene fragment expressionassays, the open reading frame encoding glucagon receptor is fragmentedeither randomly or by specific genetic constructions and the reactivityof the expressed fragments of glucagon receptor with the antibody to betested is determined. The gene fragments may, for example, be producedby PCR and then transcribed and translated into protein in vitro, in thepresence of radioactive amino acids. The binding of the antibody to theradioactively labeled glucagon receptor fragments is then determined byimmunoprecipitation and gel electrophoresis. Certain epitopes can alsobe identified by using large libraries of random peptide sequencesdisplayed on the surface of phage particles (phage libraries) or yeast(yeast display). Alternatively, a defined library of overlapping peptidefragments can be tested for binding to the test antibody in simplebinding assays. In an additional example, mutagenesis of an antigen,domain swapping experiments and alanine scanning mutagenesis can beperformed to identify residues required, sufficient, and/or necessaryfor epitope binding. For example, alanine scanning mutagenesisexperiments can be performed using a mutant glucagon receptor in whichvarious residues of the glucagon receptor polypeptide have been replacedwith alanine. By assessing binding of the antibody to the mutantglucagon receptor, the importance of the particular glucagon receptorresidues to antibody binding can be assessed.

Yet another method which can be used to characterize an anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody is to use competition assays with otherantibodies known to bind to the same antigen, i.e., various fragments ofglucagon receptor, to determine if the anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody binds to the same epitope as other antibodies. Competitionassays are well known to those of skill in the art.

The binding affinity (K_(D)) of an anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody to glucagon receptor can be about 0.001 to about 200 nM. Insome embodiments, the binding affinity is any of about 200 nM, about 100nM, about 50 nM, about 10 nM, about 1 nM, about 500 μm, about 100 μm,about 60 μm, about 50 μm, about 20 μm, about 15 μM, about 10 μm, about 5μm, about 2 μm, or about 1 μm. In some embodiments, the binding affinityis less than any of about 250 nM, about 200 nM, about 100 nM, about 50nM, about 10 nM, about 1 nM, about 500 μm, about 100 μm, about 50 μm,about 20 μm, about 10 μm, about 5 μm, or about 2 μm.

Accordingly, the invention provides any of the following, orcompositions (including pharmaceutical compositions) comprising anantibody having a partial light chain sequence and a partial heavy chainsequence as found in Tables 1A or 1B, or variants thereof. In Tables 1Aand 1B, the underlined sequences are CDR sequences according to Kabat,and the sequences in bold are CDR sequences according to Chothia.

TABLE 1A Variable Regions Sequences of Anti-glucagon receptor antagonistAntibodies mAb Light Chain Heavy Chain mAb1 DIVMTQSQKFMSASVGDRVSITQIQLVQSGPELKKPGETVKISCKA K_(D) = C KASQNVRTAVV WFQQKPGQ SGYTFTDFSIHWVKQAPGKGLKW 0.64 nM SPNTLIY LASNRHS EVPDRFTGMGWINTETDESTYADDFKGRFAF SGSGTDFTLTISNVQSEDLADY SLETSASTAYLQINNLKNEDTATYFFC LQHWTYPFT FASGTKLEIK CVK SRGWTYGPPDY WGQGTTLT (SEQ ID NO: 2)VSS (SEQ ID NO: 3) mAb2 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKT ½ = C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK ASGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLE 5.75 min APKLLIYLATNRHS GVPSRFSG WMGWINTETDETSYADDFKGRVT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAV C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK YYCVK SRGWSYGPPDY WGQGTT(SEQ ID NO: 4) VTVSS (SEQ ID NO: 5) mAb3 DIQMTQSPASLAASVGETVTITEVQLQQSGPELIKPGASVKMSCKA C RASENIYYSLA WYQQKQGKS SGYTFTSCLIHWVKLKPGQGLEWI PQLLIY NANSLED GVPSRFSGS GYINPYNDGTKYNEKFKGRATLTSGSGTQYSMKINSIQPEDTATYF DKSSSTAYMELSSLTSEDSAVYYC C KQAYDVPFT FGSGTKLVIKAR M DYGNLWYFDV WGAGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 6) SS (SEQ ID NO: 7) mAb4EIVLTQSPATLSLSPGERATLS QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCK K_(D) = 10.2 nM CRASENIYYSLA WYQQKPGQA ASGYTFT SSLIHWVRQAPGQGLE PRLLIY NANSLED GIPARFSGSWMGYINPYNDGTKYNEKFKGRVT GSGTDFTLTISSLEPEDFAVYY MTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVC KQAYDVPFT FGGGTKVEIK YYCAR MDYGNLWYFDV WGQGTL (SEQ ID NO: 8)VTVSS (SEQ ID NO: 9) mAb5 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKK_(D) = 224 pM C QASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK ASGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLE APKLLIYLASNRHS GVPSRFSG WMGWINTETDETSYADDFKGRVT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAV C LQHWTYPFT FGGGTKVEIK YYCVK SRYWSYGPPDY WGQGTT(SEQ ID NO: 10) VTVSS(SEQ ID NO: 11) mAb6 QIVLSQSPAILSASPGEKVTMTDVQFQESGPGLVKPSQSLSLTCTV C RANSTLNYMH WYQQKPGSS TDYSFT SDYAWNWFRQFPGNKLEPKPWIF GTSILAS GVPLRFSGS WMGYINYSGSTNYNPSLKSRISIT GSGTSYSLTISRVETEDAATYYRDTSKNQFFLQLNSVTTEDTATYY C QQWSSNPWT FGGGTKLEIK CAS TVVEGYYFDYWGQGTTLTVS (SEQ ID NO: 42) S (SEQ ID NO: 43)

Variable Regions Sequences of Anti-glucagon receptor antagonistAntibodies mAb Light Chain Heavy Chain H2-A8 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 20.78 min APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEFDFTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 25° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRGWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 57) H2-A11DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 26.26 min APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEYDFTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYY RDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 25° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRGWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 58) H2-C8 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 20.63 min. APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETRGTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYY RDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 25° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEI K CVK SRGWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 59) H2-E7 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 13.66 APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSG MGWYNLETDETSYADDFKGRVTMmin. at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYY  TRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 25° C. CLQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRGWSYGPPDY WGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4)SS (SEQ ID NO: 60) H2-F10 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 21.59 min. APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINLEFDETSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 25° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRGWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 61) H2-F11DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 17.75 min. APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEFDYTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 25° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRGWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 62) H3-C10DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 3.68 min. APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETDETSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 25° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 64) H3-F5 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 2.4 min. APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETDETSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 25° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SLFWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 65) H3-H9 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 2.26 min. APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETDETSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 25° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRWWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVT (SEQ ID NO: 4) VSS (SEQ ID NO: 66) H2-A11-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-1 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 4.19 h APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEYDFTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVESLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 67) H2-A11-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-2 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 8.53 h APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEYDFTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SLFWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 68) H2-A11-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-3 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 17.21 h  APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEYDFTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 69) H2-A11-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-4 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 6.36 h APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEYDFTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRWWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVT (SEQ ID NO: 4) VSS (SEQ ID NO: 70) H2-C8-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA H3-1 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETRGTSYADDFKGRVTMT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVE SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 71) H2-C8-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-2 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 6.89 h APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETRGTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SLFWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 72) H2-C8-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-3 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 12.38 APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETRGTSYADDFKGRVTMT h at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEI K CVK SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 73) H2-A11-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-4 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 6.36 h APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEYDFTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRWWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVT (SEQ ID NO: 4) VSS (SEQ ID NO: 70) H2-C8-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA H3-1 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETRGTSYADDFKGRVTMT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVE SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 71) H2-C8-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-2 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 6.89 h APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETRGTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SLFWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 72) H2-C8-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-3 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 12.38 APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETRGTSYADDFKGRVTMT h at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 73) H2-C8-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-4 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 5.30 h APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETRGTSYADDFKGRVTMT at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRWWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVT (SEQ ID NO: 4) VSS (SEQ ID NO: 74) H2-E7-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA H3-1 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWYNLETDETSYADDFKGRVTM SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVE SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 75) H2-E7-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-2 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFTD FSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 7.94 h APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWYNLETDETSYADDFKGRVTM at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEI K CVK SLFWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS(SEQ ID NO: 76) H2-E7- DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-3 C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 14.86 h  APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWYNLETDETSYADDFKGRVTM at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 77) H2-E7-DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA T½ = H3-4 C RASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 7.37 h APKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWYNLETDETSYADDFKGRVTM at SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY 37° C. C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIK CVK SRWWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVT (SEQ ID NO: 4) VSS (SEQ ID NO: 78) FF1 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEWAPKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSG MGWINTEYDFTSYADDFKGRVTMTSGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYY RDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIKCVK SLYWSYGPPDY WGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 78) FF2DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA kD = C QASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 171 pM APKLLIY LASNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEYDFTSYADDFKGRVTMT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFT FGGGTKVEIK CVK SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 79) SS (SEQ ID NO: 80) FF3 DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA C RASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEWAPKLLIY LATNRHS GVPSRFSG MGWINTEYDFTSYAQKFQGRVTMTSGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYY RDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFS FGGGTKLEIKCVK SLYWSYGPPDY WGQGTLVTV (SEQ ID NO: 4) SS (SEQ ID NO: 81) FF4DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTIT QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA C QASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGKSGYTFT DFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW APKLLIY LASNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEYDFTSYAQKFQGRVTMT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFT FGGGTKVEIK CVK SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTLVTV (SEQ ID NO: 79) SS (SEQ ID NO: 82) FF2- DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA kD = H2WT C QASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW <200 pM APKLLIY LASNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETDETSYADDFKGRVTMT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFT FGGGTKVEIK CVK SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 79) SS (SEQ ID NO: 83) FF2- DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA kD = H2RG C QASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 187 pM APKLLIY LASNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETRGTSYADDFKGRVTMT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFT FGGGTKVEIK CVK SLYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 79) SS (SEQ ID NO: 84) FF2- DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA kD = H3RY C QASQNIRTAVV wYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW <125 pM APKLLIY LASNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTEYDFTSYADDFKGRVTMT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFT FGGGTKVEIK CVK SRYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 79) SS (SEQ ID NO: 85) FF2- DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITQVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKA kD = H2WT C QASQNIRTAVV WYQQKPGK SGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEW 224 pM H3RY APKLLIY LASNRHS GVPSRFSGMGWINTETDETSYADDFKGRVTMT SGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYY C LQHWTYPFT FGGGTKVEIK CVK SRYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTV (SEQ ID NO: 79) SS (SEQ ID NO: 86)

The invention also provides CDR portions of antibodies to glucagonreceptor. Determination of CDR regions is well within the skill of theart. It is understood that in some embodiments, CDRs can be acombination of the Kabat and Chothia CDR (also termed “combined CDRs” or“extended CDRs”). In another approach, referred to herein as the“conformational definition” of CDRs, the positions of the CDRs may beidentified as the residues that make enthalpic contributions to antigenbinding. See, e.g., Makabe et al., 2008, Journal of BiologicalChemistry, 283:1156-1166. In general, “conformational CDRs” include theresidue positions in the Kabat CDRs and Vernier zones which areconstrained in order to maintain proper loop structure for the antibodyto bind a specific antigen. Determination of conformational CDRs is wellwithin the skill of the art. In some embodiments, the CDRs are the KabatCDRs. In other embodiments, the CDRs are the Chothia CDRs. In otherembodiments, the CDRs are the extended, AbM, conformational, or contactCDRs. In other words, in embodiments with more than one CDR, the CDRsmay be any of Kabat, Chothia, extended, AbM, conformational, contactCDRs or combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the antibody comprises three CDRs of any one of theheavy chain variable regions shown in Table 1A or 1B. In someembodiments, the antibody comprises three CDRs of any one of the lightchain variable regions shown in Table 1A or 1B. In some embodiments, theantibody comprises three CDRs of any one of the heavy chain variableregions shown in Table 1A or 1B, and three CDRs of any one of the lightchain variable regions shown in Table 1A or 1B.

Tables 2A and 2B provide examples of CDR sequences of anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibodies provided herein.

TABLE 2A  Anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodies andantigen-binding CDR sequences according to Kabat (underlined) and Chothia (bold) mAb CDR1 CDR2 CDR3 mAb1 LC KASQNVRTAVV (SEQ LASNRHS  (SEQ ID LQHWTYPFT  (SEQ ID ID NO: 12) NO: 13) NO: 14) HCGYTFTDF SIH (SEQ ID WINTETDESTYADDFK SRGWTYGPPDY  (SEQNOs: 15 (whole),   G (SEQ ID NOs:  ID NO: 20) 16 and 17) 18 and 19) mAb2LC RASQNIRTAVV  (SEQ LATNRHS  (SEQ ID  LQHWTYPFS  (SEQ ID ID NO: 21)NO: 22) NO: 23) HC GYTFTDF SVH (SEQ ID WINTETDETSYADDFK SRGWSYGPPDY (SEQ NOs: 24 (whole),  G (SEQ ID NOs:  ID NO: 27) 16 and 25) 18 and 26)mAb3 LC RASENIYYSLA  (SEQ NANSLED  (SEQ ID KQAYDVPFT  (SEQ ID ID NO: 28)NO: 29) NO: 30) HC GYTFTSCL IH (SEQ ID YINPYNDGTKYNEKFK MDYGNLWYFDV (SEQ NOs: 31 (whole),  G (SEQ ID NOs:  ID NO: 36) 32 and 33) 34 and 35)mAb4 LC RASENIYYSLA  (SEQ NANSLED  (SEQ ID KQAYDVPFT  (SEQ ID ID NO: 28)NO: 28) NO: 28) HC GYTFTSS LIH (SEQ ID YINPYNDGTKYNEKFK MDYGNLWYFDV (SEQNOs: 37 (whole),  G (SEQ ID NOs:  ID NO: 36) 38 and 39) 34 and 35) mAb5LC QASQNIRTAVV  (SEQ LASNRHS  (SEQ ID LQHWTYPFT  (SEQ ID ID NO: 40)NO: 13) NO: 14) HC GYTFTDF SVH (SEQ ID WINTETDETSYADDFK SRYWSYGPPDY (SEQ NOs: 24 (whole),  G (SEQ ID NOs:  ID NO: 41) 16 and 25) 18 and 26)

TABLE 2B  mAb5 Variants Light Chain Heavy Chain mAb CDR1 CDR2 CDR3 CDR1CDR2 CDR3 T½ [s] LM1 RASQNVRTA LASNRHS LQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINTETDESTYSRGWTYG 1527 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO: (SEQ ID ADDFKG (SEQPPDY (SEQ NO: 44) NO: 13) 14) NO: 17) ID NO: 19) ID NO: 20) LM2RASQNIRTAV LASNRHS LQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINTETDESTY SRGWTYG 1501 V (SEQ ID(SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO: (SEQ ID ADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 21) NO: 13) 14)NO: 17) ID NO: 19) ID NO: 20) LM3 KASQNVRSA LASNRHS LQHWTYPFT DFSIHWINTETDESTY SRGWTYG 781 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO (SEQ IDADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 45) NO: 13) 14) NO: 17) ID NO: 19) ID NO: 20)LM4 KASQNVRTAL LASNRHS LQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINTETDESTY SRGWTYG 754 N (SEQ ID(SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO: (SEQ ID ADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 46) NO: 13) 14)NO: 17) ID NO: 19) ID NO: 20) LM6 KASQNVRTA LATNRHS LQHWTYPFT DFSIHWINTETDESTY SRGWTYG 1685 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO: (SEQ IDADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 12) NO: 47) 14) NO: 17) ID NO: 19) ID NO: 20)LM7 KASQNVRTA LASNRHG LQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINTETDESTY SRGWTYG 1397VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO: (SEQ ID ADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 12)NO: 48) 14) NO: 17) ID NO: 19) ID NO: 20) LM8 KASQNVRTA LASNRHS QQHWTYPFDFSIH WINTETDESTY SRGWTYG 473 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID T (SEQ ID (SEQ IDADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 12) NO: 13) NO: 49) NO: 17) ID NO: 19)ID NO: 20) LM9 KASQNVRTA LASNRHS LQHWSYPFT DFSIH WINTETDESTY SRGWTYG 688VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO: (SEQ ID ADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 12)NO: 13) 49) NO: 17) ID NO: 19) ID NO: 20) LM11 KASQNVRTA LASNRHSLQHWTYPFS DFSIH WINTETDESTY SRGWTYG 1683 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO:(SEQ ID ADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 12) NO: 13) 50) NO: 17) ID NO: 19)ID NO: 20) HM5 KASQNVRTA LASNRHS LQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINTESDESTY SRGWTYG1428 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO: (SEQ ID ADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQNO: 12) NO: 13) 14) NO: 17) ID NO: 51) ID NO: 20) HM6 KASQNVRTA LASNRHSLQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINTETDETSY SRGWTYG 2068 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO:(SEQ ID ADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 12) NO: 13) 14) NO: 17) ID NO: 52)ID NO: 20) HM7 KASQNVRTA LASNRHS LQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINSETDESTY SRGWTYG 921VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO: (SEQ ID  ADDFKG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 12)NO: 13) 14) NO: 17) ID NO: 53) ID NO: 20) HM8 KASQNVRTA LASNRHSLQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINTETDESTY SRGWTYG 1559 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO:(SEQ ID  AQNFQG (SEQ PPDY (SEQ NO: 12) NO: 13) 14) NO: 17) ID NO: 54)ID NO: 20) HM11 KASQNVRTA LASNRHS LQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINTETDESTY VKSRGWS2028 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO: (SEQ ID  ADDFKG (SEQ YGPPDY NO: 12)NO: 13) 14) NO: 17) ID NO: 19) (SEQ ID NO: 55) HM12 KASQNVRTA LASNRHSLQHWTYPFT DFSIH WINTETDESTY VKSRGWT 1191 VV (SEQ ID (SEQ ID (SEQ ID NO:(SEQ ID ADDFKG (SEQ YGPPDV NO: 12) NO: 13) 14) NO: 17)  ID NO: 19)(SEQ ID NO: 56)In some embodiments, the antibody comprises three light chain CDRs andthree heavy chain CDRs from Table 2B. Consensus sequences from variantsshown in Table 2B are as follows: light chain variable region CDR1:X₁ASQNX₂RX₃ AX₄X₅, wherein X₁ is K or R, X₂ is V or I, X₃ is T or S, X₄is V or L, and X₅ is V or N (SEQ ID NO: 90). Light chain variable regionCDR2: LAX₁NRH X₂, wherein X₁ is S or T, and X₂ is S or G (SEQ ID NO:91). Light chain variable region CDR3: X₁QHWX₂YPFX₃, wherein X₁ is L orQ, X₂ is T or S, and X₃ is T or S (SEQ ID NO: 92). Heavy chain variableregion CDR2: WINX₁ EX₂DEX₃X₄YAX₅X₆FX₇G wherein X₁ is T or S, X₂ is T orS, X₃ is T or S, X₄ is S or T, X₅ is D or Q, X₆ is D or N, and X₇ is Kor Q (SEQ ID NO: 93). Heavy chain variable region CDR3: SRGWX₁YGPPDX₂,wherein X₁ is T or S, and X₂ is Y or V (SEQ ID NO: 94).

In some embodiments, the antibody comprises the full-length heavy chain,with or without the C-terminal lysine, and/or the full-length lightchain of anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb5. The amino acidsequence of mAb5 full-length heavy chain (SEQ ID NO: 87) is shown below:

(SEQ ID NO: 87) QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKASGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEWMGWINTETDETSYADDFKGRVTMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYYCVKSRYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTVSSASTKGPSVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLYSLSSVVTVPSSNFGTQTYTCNVDHKPSNTKVDKTVERKCCVECPPCPAPPVAGPSVFLFPPKPKDTLMISRTPEVTCVVVDVSHEDPEVQFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQFNSTFRVVSVLTVVHQDWLNGKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKTKGQPREPQVYTLPPSREEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFYPSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPMLDSDGSFFLYSKLTVDKSRWQQGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHYTQKSLSLSPGK 

The amino acid sequence of mAb5 full-length heavy chain without theC-terminal lysine (SEQ ID NO: 88) is shown below:

(SEQ ID NO: 88) QVQLVQSGAEVKKPGASVKVSCKASGYTFTDFSVHWVRQAPGQGLEWMGWINTETDETSYADDFKGRVTMTRDTSTSTVYMELSSLRSEDTAVYYCVKSRYWSYGPPDYWGQGTTVTVSSASTKGPSVFPLAPCSRSTSESTAALGCLVKDYFPEPVTVSWNSGALTSGVHTFPAVLQSSGLYSLSSVVTVPSSNFGTQTYTCNVDHKPSNTKVDKTVERKCCVECPPCPAPPVAGPSVFLFPPKPKDTLMISRTPEVTCVVVDVSHEDPEVQFNWYVDGVEVHNAKTKPREEQFNSTFRVVSVLTVVHQDWLNGKEYKCKVSNKGLPSSIEKTISKTKGQPREPQVYTLPPSREEMTKNQVSLTCLVKGFYPSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYKTTPPMLDSDGSFFLYSKLTVDKSRWQQGNVFSCSVMHEALHNHYTQKSLSLSPG 

The amino acid sequence of mAb5 full-length light chain (SEQ ID NO: 89)is shown below:

(SEQ ID NO: 89) DIQMTQSPSSLSASVGDRVTITCQASQNIRTAVVWYQQKPGKAPKLLIYLASNRHSGVPSRFSGSGSGTDFTFTISSLQPEDIATYYCLQHWTYPFTFGGGTKVEIKRTVAAPSVFIFPPSDEQLKSGTASVVCLLNNFYPREAKVQWKVDNALQSGNSQESVTEQDSKDSTYSLSSTLTLSKADYEKHKVYACEVTHQG LSSPVTKSFNRGEC 

The invention also provides methods of generating, selecting, and makinganti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodies. The antibodies of thisinvention can be made by procedures known in the art. In someembodiments, antibodies may be made recombinantly and expressed usingany method known in the art.

In some embodiments, antibodies may be prepared and selected by phagedisplay technology. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,565,332;5,580,717; 5,733,743; and 6,265,150; and Winter et al., Annu. Rev.Immunol. 12:433-455, 1994. Alternatively, the phage display technology(McCafferty et al., Nature 348:552-553, 1990) can be used to producehuman antibodies and antibody fragments in vitro, from immunoglobulinvariable (V) domain gene repertoires from unimmunized donors. Accordingto this technique, antibody V domain genes are cloned in-frame intoeither a major or minor coat protein gene of a filamentousbacteriophage, such as M13 or fd, and displayed as functional antibodyfragments on the surface of the phage particle. Because the filamentousparticle contains a single-stranded DNA copy of the phage genome,selections based on the functional properties of the antibody alsoresult in selection of the gene encoding the antibody exhibiting thoseproperties. Thus, the phage mimics some of the properties of the B cell.Phage display can be performed in a variety of formats; for review see,e.g., Johnson, Kevin S. and Chiswell, David J., Current Opinion inStructural Biology 3:564-571, 1993. Several sources of V-gene segmentscan be used for phage display. Clackson et al., Nature 352:624-628,1991, isolated a diverse array of anti-oxazolone antibodies from a smallrandom combinatorial library of V genes derived from the spleens ofimmunized mice. A repertoire of V genes from human donors can beconstructed and antibodies to a diverse array of antigens (includingself-antigens) can be isolated essentially following the techniquesdescribed by Mark et al., J. Mol. Biol. 222:581-597, 1991, or Griffithet al., EMBO J. 12:725-734, 1993. In a natural immune response, antibodygenes accumulate mutations at a high rate (somatic hypermutation). Someof the changes introduced will confer higher affinity, and B cellsdisplaying high-affinity surface immunoglobulin are preferentiallyreplicated and differentiated during subsequent antigen challenge. Thisnatural process can be mimicked by employing the technique known as“chain shuffling.” (Marks et al., Bio/Technol. 10:779-783, 1992). Inthis method, the affinity of “primary” human antibodies obtained byphage display can be improved by sequentially replacing the heavy andlight chain V region genes with repertoires of naturally occurringvariants (repertoires) of V domain genes obtained from unimmunizeddonors. This technique allows the production of antibodies and antibodyfragments with affinities in the pM-nM range. A strategy for making verylarge phage antibody repertoires (also known as “the mother-of-alllibraries”) has been described by Waterhouse et al., Nucl. Acids Res.21:2265-2266, 1993. Gene shuffling can also be used to derive humanantibodies from rodent antibodies, where the human antibody has similaraffinities and specificities to the starting rodent antibody. Accordingto this method, which is also referred to as “epitope imprinting”, theheavy or light chain V domain gene of rodent antibodies obtained byphage display technique is replaced with a repertoire of human V domaingenes, creating rodent-human chimeras. Selection on antigen results inisolation of human variable regions capable of restoring a functionalantigen-binding site, i.e., the epitope governs (imprints) the choice ofpartner. When the process is repeated in order to replace the remainingrodent V domain, a human antibody is obtained (see PCT Publication No.WO 93/06213). Unlike traditional humanization of rodent antibodies byCDR grafting, this technique provides completely human antibodies, whichhave no framework or CDR residues of rodent origin.

In some embodiments, antibodies may be made using hybridoma technology.It is contemplated that any mammalian subject including humans orantibody producing cells therefrom can be manipulated to serve as thebasis for production of mammalian, including human, hybridoma celllines. The route and schedule of immunization of the host animal aregenerally in keeping with established and conventional techniques forantibody stimulation and production, as further described herein.Typically, the host animal is inoculated intraperitoneally,intramuscularly, orally, subcutaneously, intraplantar, and/orintradermally with an amount of immunogen, including as describedherein.

Hybridomas can be prepared from the lymphocytes and immortalized myelomacells using the general somatic cell hybridization technique of Kohler,B. and Milstein, C., 1975, Nature 256:495-497 or as modified by Buck, D.W., et al., In Vitro, 18:377-381, 1982. Available myeloma lines,including but not limited to X63-Ag8.653 and those from the SalkInstitute, Cell Distribution Center, San Diego, Calif., USA, may be usedin the hybridization. Generally, the technique involves fusing myelomacells and lymphoid cells using a fusogen such as polyethylene glycol, orby electrical means well known to those skilled in the art. After thefusion, the cells are separated from the fusion medium and grown in aselective growth medium, such as hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine(HAT) medium, to eliminate unhybridized parent cells. Any of the mediadescribed herein, supplemented with or without serum, can be used forculturing hybridomas that secrete monoclonal antibodies. As anotheralternative to the cell fusion technique, EBV immortalized B cells maybe used to produce the glucagon receptor monoclonal antibodies of thesubject invention. The hybridomas or other immortalized B-cells areexpanded and subcloned, if desired, and supernatants are assayed foranti-immunogen activity by conventional immunoassay procedures (e.g.,radioimmunoassay, enzyme immunoassay, or fluorescence immunoassay).

Hybridomas that may be used as source of antibodies encompass allderivatives, progeny cells of the parent hybridomas that producemonoclonal antibodies specific for glucagon receptor, or a portionthereof.

Hybridomas that produce such antibodies may be grown in vitro or in vivousing known procedures. The monoclonal antibodies may be isolated fromthe culture media or body fluids, by conventional immunoglobulinpurification procedures such as ammonium sulfate precipitation, gelelectrophoresis, dialysis, chromatography, and ultrafiltration, ifdesired. Undesired activity, if present, can be removed, for example, byrunning the preparation over adsorbents made of the immunogen attachedto a solid phase and eluting or releasing the desired antibodies off theimmunogen. Immunization of a host animal with a glucagon receptorpolypeptide, or a fragment containing the target amino acid sequenceconjugated to a protein that is immunogenic in the species to beimmunized, e.g., keyhole limpet hemocyanin, serum albumin, bovinethyroglobulin, or soybean trypsin inhibitor using a bifunctional orderivatizing agent, for example, maleimidobenzoyl sulfosuccinimide ester(conjugation through cysteine residues), N-hydroxysuccinimide (throughlysine residues), glutaraldehyde, succinic anhydride, SOCl₂, orR¹N═C═NR, where R and R¹ are different alkyl groups, can yield apopulation of antibodies (e.g., monoclonal antibodies).

If desired, the anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody (monoclonalor polyclonal) of interest may be sequenced and the polynucleotidesequence may then be cloned into a vector for expression or propagation.The sequence encoding the antibody of interest may be maintained invector in a host cell and the host cell can then be expanded and frozenfor future use. Production of recombinant monoclonal antibodies in cellculture can be carried out through cloning of antibody genes from Bcells by means known in the art. See, e.g. Tiller et al., 2008, J.Immunol. Methods 329, 112; U.S. Pat. No. 7,314,622.

In some embodiments, the polynucleotide sequence may be used for geneticmanipulation to “humanize” the antibody or to improve the affinity, orother characteristics of the antibody. Antibodies may also be customizedfor use, for example, in dogs, cats, primate, equines and bovines.

In some embodiments, fully human antibodies may be obtained by usingcommercially available mice that have been engineered to expressspecific human immunoglobulin proteins. Transgenic animals that aredesigned to produce a more desirable (e.g., fully human antibodies) ormore robust immune response may also be used for generation of humanizedor human antibodies. Examples of such technology are Xenomouse™ fromAbgenix, Inc. (Fremont, Calif.) and HuMAb-Mouse® and TC Mouse™ fromMedarex, Inc. (Princeton, N.J.).

Antibodies may be made recombinantly by first isolating the antibodiesand antibody producing cells from host animals, obtaining the genesequence, and using the gene sequence to express the antibodyrecombinantly in host cells (e.g., CHO cells). Another method which maybe employed is to express the antibody sequence in plants (e.g.,tobacco) or transgenic milk. Methods for expressing antibodiesrecombinantly in plants or milk have been disclosed. See, for example,Peeters, et al. Vaccine 19:2756, 2001; Lonberg, N. and D. Huszar Int.Rev. Immunol 13:65, 1995; and Pollock, et al., J Immunol Methods231:147, 1999. Methods for making derivatives of antibodies, e.g.,domain, single chain, etc. are known in the art.

Immunoassays and flow cytometry sorting techniques such as fluorescenceactivated cell sorting (FACS) can also be employed to isolate antibodiesthat are specific for glucagon receptor.

DNA encoding the monoclonal antibodies is readily isolated and sequencedusing conventional procedures (e.g., by using oligonucleotide probesthat are capable of binding specifically to genes encoding the heavy andlight chains of the monoclonal antibodies). The hybridoma cells serve asa preferred source of such DNA. Once isolated, the DNA may be placedinto expression vectors (such as expression vectors disclosed in PCTPublication No. WO 87/04462), which are then transfected into host cellssuch as E. coli cells, simian COS cells, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)cells, or myeloma cells that do not otherwise produce immunoglobulinprotein, to obtain the synthesis of monoclonal antibodies in therecombinant host cells. See, e.g., PCT Publication No. WO 87/04462. TheDNA also may be modified, for example, by substituting the codingsequence for human heavy and light chain constant domains in place ofthe homologous murine sequences, Morrison et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.81:6851, 1984, or by covalently joining to the immunoglobulin codingsequence all or part of the coding sequence for a non-immunoglobulinpolypeptide. In that manner, “chimeric” or “hybrid” antibodies areprepared that have the binding specificity of a glucagon receptormonoclonal antibody herein.

Antibody fragments can be produced by proteolytic or other degradationof the antibodies, by recombinant methods (i.e., single or fusionpolypeptides) as described above or by chemical synthesis. Polypeptidesof the antibodies, especially shorter polypeptides up to about 50 aminoacids, are conveniently made by chemical synthesis.

Methods of chemical synthesis are known in the art and are commerciallyavailable. For example, an antibody could be produced by an automatedpolypeptide synthesizer employing the solid phase method. See also, U.S.Pat. Nos. 5,807,715; 4,816,567; and 6,331,415.

In some embodiments, a polynucleotide comprises a sequence encoding theheavy chain and/or the light chain variable regions of antibody mAb1,mAb2, mAb3, mAb4, mAb5, mAb6, LM1, LM2, LM3, LM4, LM6, LM7, LMB, LM9,LM11, HM4, HM6, HM7, HM8, HM11, or HM12. The sequence encoding theantibody of interest may be maintained in a vector in a host cell andthe host cell can then be expanded and frozen for future use. Vectors(including expression vectors) and host cells are further describedherein.

The invention includes affinity matured embodiments. For example,affinity matured antibodies can be produced by procedures known in theart (Marks et al., 1992, Bio/Technology, 10:779-783; Barbas et al.,1994, Proc Nat. Acad. Sci, USA 91:3809-3813; Schier et al., 1995, Gene,169:147-155; Yelton et al., 1995, J. Immunol., 155:1994-2004; Jackson etal., 1995, J. Immunol., 154(7):3310-9; Hawkins et al., 1992, J. Mol.Biol., 226:889-896; and PCT Publication No. WO2004/058184).

The following methods may be used for adjusting the affinity of anantibody and for characterizing a CDR. One way of characterizing a CDRof an antibody and/or altering (such as improving) the binding affinityof a polypeptide, such as an antibody, termed “library scanningmutagenesis”. Generally, library scanning mutagenesis works as follows.One or more amino acid positions in the CDR are replaced with two ormore (such as 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,19, or 20) amino acids using art recognized methods. This generatessmall libraries of clones (in some embodiments, one for every amino acidposition that is analyzed), each with a complexity of two or moremembers (if two or more amino acids are substituted at every position).Generally, the library also includes a clone comprising the native(unsubstituted) amino acid. A small number of clones, e.g., about 20-80clones (depending on the complexity of the library), from each libraryare screened for binding affinity to the target polypeptide (or otherbinding target), and candidates with increased, the same, decreased, orno binding are identified. Methods for determining binding affinity arewell-known in the art. Binding affinity may be determined using, forexample, Biacore™ surface plasmon resonance analysis, which detectsdifferences in binding affinity of about 2-fold or greater, Kinexa®Biosensor, scintillation proximity assays, ELISA, ORIGEN® immunoassay,fluorescence quenching, fluorescence transfer, and/or yeast display.Binding affinity may also be screened using a suitable bioassay.Biacore™ is particularly useful when the starting antibody already bindswith a relatively high affinity, for example a K_(D) of about 10 nM orlower.

In some embodiments, every amino acid position in a CDR is replaced (insome embodiments, one at a time) with all 20 natural amino acids usingart recognized mutagenesis methods (some of which are described herein).This generates small libraries of clones (in some embodiments, one forevery amino acid position that is analyzed), each with a complexity of20 members (if all 20 amino acids are substituted at every position).

In some embodiments, the library to be screened comprises substitutionsin two or more positions, which may be in the same CDR or in two or moreCDRs. Thus, the library may comprise substitutions in two or morepositions in one CDR. The library may comprise substitution in two ormore positions in two or more CDRs. The library may comprisesubstitution in 3, 4, 5, or more positions, said positions found in two,three, four, five or six CDRs. The substitution may be prepared usinglow redundancy codons. See, e.g., Table 2 of Balint et al., 1993, Gene137(1):109-18.

The CDR may be heavy chain variable region (VH) CDR3 and/or light chainvariable region (VL) CDR3. The CDR may be one or more of VH CDR1, VHCDR2, VH CDR3, VL CDR1, VL CDR2, and/or VL CDR3. The CDR may be a KabatCDR, a Chothia CDR, an extended CDR, an AbM CDR, a contact CDR, or aconformational CDR.

Candidates with improved binding may be sequenced, thereby identifying aCDR substitution mutant which results in improved affinity (also termedan “improved” substitution). Candidates that bind may also be sequenced,thereby identifying a CDR substitution which retains binding.

Multiple rounds of screening may be conducted. For example, candidates(each comprising an amino acid substitution at one or more position ofone or more CDR) with improved binding are also useful for the design ofa second library containing at least the original and substituted aminoacid at each improved CDR position (i.e., amino acid position in the CDRat which a substitution mutant showed improved binding). Preparation,and screening or selection of this library is discussed further below.

Library scanning mutagenesis also provides a means for characterizing aCDR, in so far as the frequency of clones with improved binding, thesame binding, decreased binding or no binding also provide informationrelating to the importance of each amino acid position for the stabilityof the antibody-antigen complex. For example, if a position of the CDRretains binding when changed to all 20 amino acids, that position isidentified as a position that is unlikely to be required for antigenbinding. Conversely, if a position of CDR retains binding in only asmall percentage of substitutions, that position is identified as aposition that is important to CDR function. Thus, the library scanningmutagenesis methods generate information regarding positions in the CDRsthat can be changed to many different amino acids (including all 20amino acids), and positions in the CDRs which cannot be changed or whichcan only be changed to a few amino acids.

Candidates with improved affinity may be combined in a second library,which includes the improved amino acid, the original amino acid at thatposition, and may further include additional substitutions at thatposition, depending on the complexity of the library that is desired, orpermitted using the desired screening or selection method. In addition,if desired, adjacent amino acid position can be randomized to at leasttwo or more amino acids. Randomization of adjacent amino acids maypermit additional conformational flexibility in the mutant CDR, whichmay in turn, permit or facilitate the introduction of a larger number ofimproving mutations. The library may also comprise substitution atpositions that did not show improved affinity in the first round ofscreening.

The second library is screened or selected for library members withimproved and/or altered binding affinity using any method known in theart, including screening using Kinexa™ biosensor analysis, and selectionusing any method known in the art for selection, including phagedisplay, yeast display, and ribosome display.

To express the anti-glucagon receptor antibodies of the presentinvention, DNA fragments encoding VH and VL regions can first beobtained using any of the methods described above. Variousmodifications, e.g. mutations, deletions, and/or additions can also beintroduced into the DNA sequences using standard methods known to thoseof skill in the art. For example, mutagenesis can be carried out usingstandard methods, such as PCR-mediated mutagenesis, in which the mutatednucleotides are incorporated into the PCR primers such that the PCRproduct contains the desired mutations or site-directed mutagenesis.

The invention encompasses modifications to the variable regions shown inTable 1 and the CDRs shown in Tables 2A or 2B. For example, theinvention includes antibodies comprising functionally equivalentvariable regions and CDRs which do not significantly affect theirproperties as well as variants which have enhanced or decreased activityand/or affinity. For example, the amino acid sequence may be mutated toobtain an antibody with the desired binding affinity to glucagonreceptor. Modification of polypeptides is routine practice in the artand need not be described in detail herein. Examples of modifiedpolypeptides include polypeptides with conservative substitutions ofamino acid residues, one or more deletions or additions of amino acidswhich do not significantly deleteriously change the functional activity,or which mature (enhance) the affinity of the polypeptide for itsligand, or use of chemical analogs.

Amino acid sequence insertions include amino- and/or carboxyl-terminalfusions ranging in length from one residue to polypeptides containing ahundred or more residues, as well as intrasequence insertions of singleor multiple amino acid residues. Examples of terminal insertions includean antibody with an N-terminal methionyl residue or the antibody fusedto an epitope tag. Other insertional variants of the antibody moleculeinclude the fusion to the N- or C-terminus of the antibody of an enzymeor a polypeptide which increases the half-life of the antibody in theblood circulation.

Substitution variants have at least one amino acid residue in theantibody molecule removed and a different residue inserted in its place.The sites of greatest interest for substitutional mutagenesis includethe hypervariable regions, but framework alterations are alsocontemplated. Conservative substitutions are shown in Table 3 under theheading of “conservative substitutions.” If such substitutions result ina change in biological activity, then more substantial changes,denominated “exemplary substitutions” in Table 3, or as furtherdescribed below in reference to amino acid classes, may be introducedand the products screened.

TABLE 3 Amino Acid Substitutions Conservative Original ResidueSubstitutions Exemplary Substitutions Ala (A) Val Val; Leu; Ile Arg (R)Lys Lys; Gln; Asn Asn (N) Gln Gln; His; Asp, Lys; Arg Asp (D) Glu Glu;Asn Cys (C) Ser Ser; Ala Gln (Q) Asn Asn; Glu Glu (E) Asp Asp; Gln Gly(G) Ala Ala His (H) Arg Asn; Gln; Lys; Arg Ile (I) Leu Leu; Val; Met;Ala; Phe; Norleucine Leu (L) Ile Norleucine; Ile; Val; Met; Ala; Phe Lys(K) Arg Arg; Gln; Asn Met (M) Leu Leu; Phe; Ile Phe (F) Tyr Leu; Val;Ile; Ala; Tyr Pro (P) Ala Ala Ser (S) Thr Thr Thr (T) Ser Ser Trp (W)Tyr Tyr; Phe Tyr (Y) Phe Trp; Phe; Thr; Ser Val (V) Leu Ile; Leu; Met;Phe; Ala; Norleucine

Substantial modifications in the biological properties of the antibodyare accomplished by selecting substitutions that differ significantly intheir effect on maintaining (a) the structure of the polypeptidebackbone in the area of the substitution, for example, as a β-sheet orhelical conformation, (b) the charge or hydrophobicity of the moleculeat the target site, or (c) the bulk of the side chain. Naturallyoccurring residues are divided into groups based on common side-chainproperties:

-   -   (1) Non-polar: Norleucine, Met, Ala, Val, Leu, Ile;    -   (2) Polar without charge: Cys, Ser, Thr, Asn, Gin;    -   (3) Acidic (negatively charged): Asp, Glu;    -   (4) Basic (positively charged): Lys, Arg;    -   (5) Residues that influence chain orientation: Gly, Pro; and    -   (6) Aromatic: Trp, Tyr, Phe, His.

Non-conservative substitutions are made by exchanging a member of one ofthese classes for another class.

One type of substitution, for example, that may be made is to change oneor more cysteines in the antibody, which may be chemically reactive, toanother residue, such as, without limitation, alanine or serine. Forexample, there can be a substitution of a non-canonical cysteine. Thesubstitution can be made in a CDR or framework region of a variabledomain or in the constant region of an antibody. In some embodiments,the cysteine is canonical. Any cysteine residue not involved inmaintaining the proper conformation of the antibody also may besubstituted, generally with serine, to improve the oxidative stabilityof the molecule and prevent aberrant cross-linking. Conversely, cysteinebond(s) may be added to the antibody to improve its stability,particularly where the antibody is an antibody fragment such as an Fvfragment.

The antibodies may also be modified, e.g. in the variable domains of theheavy and/or light chains, e.g., to alter a binding property of theantibody. Changes in the variable region can alter binding affinityand/or specificity. In some embodiments, no more than one to fiveconservative amino acid substitutions are made within a CDR domain. Inother embodiments, no more than one to three conservative amino acidsubstitutions are made within a CDR domain. For example, a mutation maybe made in one or more of the CDR regions to increase or decrease theK_(D) of the antibody for glucagon receptor, to increase or decreasek_(off), or to alter the binding specificity of the antibody. Techniquesin site-directed mutagenesis are well-known in the art. See, e.g.,Sambrook et al. and Ausubel et al., supra.

A modification or mutation may also be made in a framework region orconstant region to increase the half-life of an anti-glucagon receptorantibody. See, e.g., PCT

Publication No. WO 00/09560. A mutation in a framework region orconstant region can also be made to alter the immunogenicity of theantibody, to provide a site for covalent or non-covalent binding toanother molecule, or to alter such properties as complement fixation,FcR binding and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In someembodiments, no more than one to five conservative amino acidsubstitutions are made within the framework region or constant region.In other embodiments, no more than one to three conservative amino acidsubstitutions are made within the framework region or constant region.According to the invention, a single antibody may have mutations in anyone or more of the CDRs or framework regions of the variable domain orin the constant region.

Modifications also include glycosylated and nonglycosylatedpolypeptides, as well as polypeptides with other post-translationalmodifications, such as, for example, glycosylation with differentsugars, acetylation, and phosphorylation. Antibodies are glycosylated atconserved positions in their constant regions (Jefferis and Lund, 1997,Chem. Immunol. 65:111-128; Wright and Morrison, 1997, TibTECH 15:26-32).The oligosaccharide side chains of the immunoglobulins affect theprotein's function (Boyd et al., 1996, Mol. Immunol. 32:1311-1318;Wittwe and Howard, 1990, Biochem. 29:4175-4180) and the intramolecularinteraction between portions of the glycoprotein, which can affect theconformation and presented three-dimensional surface of the glycoprotein(Jefferis and Lund, supra; Wyss and Wagner, 1996, Current Opin. Biotech.7:409-416). Oligosaccharides may also serve to target a givenglycoprotein to certain molecules based upon specific recognitionstructures. Glycosylation of antibodies has also been reported to affectantibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). In particular,antibodies produced by CHO cells with tetracycline-regulated expressionof β(1,4)-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnTIII), aglycosyltransferase catalyzing formation of bisecting GIcNAc, wasreported to have improved ADCC activity (Umana et al., 1999, NatureBiotech. 17:176-180).

Glycosylation of antibodies is typically either N-linked or O-linked.N-linked refers to the attachment of the carbohydrate moiety to the sidechain of an asparagine residue. The tripeptide sequencesasparagine-X-serine, asparagine-X-threonine, and asparagine-X-cysteine,where X is any amino acid except proline, are the recognition sequencesfor enzymatic attachment of the carbohydrate moiety to the asparagineside chain. Thus, the presence of either of these tripeptide sequencesin a polypeptide creates a potential glycosylation site. 0-linkedglycosylation refers to the attachment of one of the sugarsN-acetylgalactosamine, galactose, or xylose to a hydroxyamino acid, mostcommonly serine or threonine, although 5-hydroxyproline or5-hydroxylysine may also be used.

Addition of glycosylation sites to the antibody is convenientlyaccomplished by altering the amino acid sequence such that it containsone or more of the above-described tripeptide sequences (for N-linkedglycosylation sites). The alteration may also be made by the additionof, or substitution by, one or more serine or threonine residues to thesequence of the original antibody (for O-linked glycosylation sites).

The glycosylation pattern of antibodies may also be altered withoutaltering the underlying nucleotide sequence. Glycosylation largelydepends on the host cell used to express the antibody. Since the celltype used for expression of recombinant glycoproteins, e.g. antibodies,as potential therapeutics is rarely the native cell, variations in theglycosylation pattern of the antibodies can be expected (see, e.g. Hseet al., 1997, J. Biol. Chem. 272:9062-9070).

In addition to the choice of host cells, factors that affectglycosylation during recombinant production of antibodies include growthmode, media formulation, culture density, oxygenation, pH, purificationschemes and the like. Various methods have been proposed to alter theglycosylation pattern achieved in a particular host organism includingintroducing or overexpressing certain enzymes involved inoligosaccharide production (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,047,335; 5,510,261 and5,278,299). Glycosylation, or certain types of glycosylation, can beenzymatically removed from the glycoprotein, for example, usingendoglycosidase H (Endo H), N-glycosidase F, endoglycosidase F1,endoglycosidase F2, endoglycosidase F3. In addition, the recombinanthost cell can be genetically engineered to be defective in processingcertain types of polysaccharides. These and similar techniques are wellknown in the art.

Other methods of modification include using coupling techniques known inthe art, including, but not limited to, enzymatic means, oxidativesubstitution and chelation. Modifications can be used, for example, forattachment of labels for immunoassay. Modified polypeptides are madeusing established procedures in the art and can be screened usingstandard assays known in the art, some of which are described below andin the Examples.

In some embodiments, the antibody comprises a modified constant regionthat has increased or decreased binding affinity to a human Fc gammareceptor, is immunologically inert or partially inert, e.g., does nottrigger complement mediated lysis, does not stimulate antibody-dependentcell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), or does not activate microglia; orhas reduced activities (compared to the unmodified antibody) in any oneor more of the following: triggering complement mediated lysis,stimulating ADCC, or activating microglia. Different modifications ofthe constant region may be used to achieve optimal level and/orcombination of effector functions. See, for example, Morgan et al.,Immunology 86:319-324, 1995; Lund et al., J. Immunology 157:4963-9157:4963-4969, 1996; Idusogie et al., J. Immunology 164:4178-4184, 2000;Tao et al., J. Immunology 143: 2595-2601, 1989; and Jefferis et al.,Immunological Reviews 163:59-76, 1998. In some embodiments, the constantregion is modified as described in Eur. J. Immunol., 1999, 29:2613-2624;PCT Application No. PCT/GB99/01441; and/or UK Patent Application No.9809951.8.

In some embodiments, an antibody constant region can be modified toavoid interaction with Fc gamma receptor and the complement and immunesystems. The techniques for preparation of such antibodies are describedin WO 99/58572. For example, the constant region may be engineered tomore resemble human constant regions to avoid immune response if theantibody is used in clinical trials and treatments in humans. See, e.g.,U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,997,867 and 5,866,692.

In some embodiments, the Fc can be human IgG₂ or human IgG₄. The Fc canbe human IgG₂ containing the mutation A330P331 to S330S331 (IgG_(2Δa)),in which the amino acid residues are numbered with reference to the wildtype IgG₂ sequence. Eur. J. Immunol., 1999, 29:2613-2624. In someembodiments, the antibody comprises a constant region of IgG₄ comprisingthe following mutations (Armour et al., 2003, Molecular Immunology 40585-593): E233F234L235 to P233V234A235 (IgG_(4Δc)), in which thenumbering is with reference to wild type IgG4. In yet anotherembodiment, the Fc is human IgG₄ E233F234L235 to P233V234A235 withdeletion G236 (IgG_(4Δb)). In another embodiment the Fc is any humanIgG₄ Fc (IgG₄, IgG_(4Δb) or IgG_(4Δc)) containing hinge stabilizingmutation S228 to P228 (Aalberse et al., 2002, Immunology 105, 9-19).

In still other embodiments, the constant region is aglycosylated forN-linked glycosylation. In some embodiments, the constant region isaglycosylated for N-linked glycosylation by mutating the oligosaccharideattachment residue and/or flanking residues that are part of theN-glycosylation recognition sequence in the constant region. Forexample, N-glycosylation site N297 may be mutated to, e.g., A, Q, K, orH. See, Tao et al., J. Immunology 143: 2595-2601, 1989; and Jefferis etal., Immunological Reviews 163:59-76, 1998. In some embodiments, theconstant region is aglycosylated for N-linked glycosylation. Theconstant region may be aglycosylated for N-linked glycosylationenzymatically (such as removing carbohydrate by enzyme PNGase), or byexpression in a glycosylation deficient host cell.

Other antibody modifications include antibodies that have been modifiedas described in PCT Publication No. WO 99/58572. These antibodiescomprise, in addition to a binding domain directed at the targetmolecule, an effector domain having an amino acid sequence substantiallyhomologous to all or part of a constant region of a human immunoglobulinheavy chain. These antibodies are capable of binding the target moleculewithout triggering significant complement dependent lysis, orcell-mediated destruction of the target. In some embodiments, theeffector domain is capable of specifically binding FcRn and/or FcγRIIb.These are typically based on chimeric domains derived from two or morehuman immunoglobulin heavy chain CH2 domains. Antibodies modified inthis manner are particularly suitable for use in chronic antibodytherapy, to avoid inflammatory and other adverse reactions toconventional antibody therapy.

In some embodiments, the antibody comprises a modified constant regionthat has increased binding affinity for FcRn and/or an increased serumhalf-life as compared with the unmodified antibody.

In a process known as “germlining”, certain amino acids in the VH and VLsequences can be mutated to match those found naturally in germline VHand VL sequences. In particular, the amino acid sequences of theframework regions in the VH and VL sequences can be mutated to match thegermline sequences to reduce the risk of immunogenicity when theantibody is administered. Germline DNA sequences for human VH and VLgenes are known in the art (see e.g., the “Vbase” human germlinesequence database; see also Kabat, E. A., et al., 1991, Sequences ofProteins of Immunological Interest, Fifth Edition, U.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services, NIH Publication No. 91-3242; Tomlinson etal., 1992, J. Mol. Biol. 227:776-798; and Cox et al., 1994, Eur. J.Immunol. 24:827-836).

Another type of amino acid substitution that may be made is to removepotential proteolytic sites in the antibody. Such sites may occur in aCDR or framework region of a variable domain or in the constant regionof an antibody. Substitution of cysteine residues and removal ofproteolytic sites may decrease the risk of heterogeneity in the antibodyproduct and thus increase its homogeneity. Another type of amino acidsubstitution is to eliminate asparagine-glycine pairs, which formpotential deamidation sites, by altering one or both of the residues. Inanother example, the C-terminal lysine of the heavy chain of ananti-glucagon receptor antibody of the invention can be cleaved. Invarious embodiments of the invention, the heavy and light chains of theanti-glucagon receptor antibodies may optionally include a signalsequence.

Once DNA fragments encoding the VH and VL segments of the presentinvention are obtained, these DNA fragments can be further manipulatedby standard recombinant DNA techniques, for example to convert thevariable region genes to full-length antibody chain genes, to Fabfragment genes, or to a scFv gene. In these manipulations, a VL- orVH-encoding DNA fragment is operatively linked to another DNA fragmentencoding another protein, such as an antibody constant region or aflexible linker. The term “operatively linked”, as used in this context,is intended to mean that the two DNA fragments are joined such that theamino acid sequences encoded by the two DNA fragments remain in-frame.

The isolated DNA encoding the VH region can be converted to afull-length heavy chain gene by operatively linking the VH-encoding DNAto another DNA molecule encoding heavy chain constant regions (CH1, CH2and CH3). The sequences of human heavy chain constant region genes areknown in the art (see e.g., Kabat, E. A., et al., 1991, Sequences ofProteins of Immunological Interest, Fifth Edition, U.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services, NIH Publication No. 91-3242) and DNAfragments encompassing these regions can be obtained by standard PCRamplification. The heavy chain constant region can be an IgG₁, IgG₂,IgG₃, IgG₄, IgA, IgE, IgM or IgD constant region, but most preferably isan IgG₁ or IgG₂ constant region. The IgG constant region sequence can beany of the various alleles or allotypes known to occur among differentindividuals, such as Gm(1), Gm(2), Gm(3), and Gm(17). These allotypesrepresent naturally occurring amino acid substitution in the IgG1constant regions. For a Fab fragment heavy chain gene, the VH-encodingDNA can be operatively linked to another DNA molecule encoding only theheavy chain CH1 constant region. The CH1 heavy chain constant region maybe derived from any of the heavy chain genes.

The isolated DNA encoding the VL region can be converted to afull-length light chain gene (as well as a Fab light chain gene) byoperatively linking the VL-encoding DNA to another DNA molecule encodingthe light chain constant region, CL. The sequences of human light chainconstant region genes are known in the art (see e.g., Kabat, E. A., etal., 1991, Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, FifthEdition, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH PublicationNo. 91-3242) and DNA fragments encompassing these regions can beobtained by standard PCR amplification. The light chain constant regioncan be a kappa or lambda constant region. The kappa constant region maybe any of the various alleles known to occur among differentindividuals, such as Inv(1), Inv(2), and Inv(3). The lambda constantregion may be derived from any of the three lambda genes.

To create a scFv gene, the VH- and VL-encoding DNA fragments areoperatively linked to another fragment encoding a flexible linker suchthat the VH and VL sequences can be expressed as a contiguoussingle-chain protein, with the VL and VH regions joined by the flexiblelinker (See e.g., Bird et al., 1988, Science 242:423-426; Huston et al.,1988, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5879-5883; McCafferty et al., 1990,Nature 348:552-554. An example of a linking peptide is (GGGGS)₃ (SEQ IDNO: 18), which bridges approximately 3.5 nm between the carboxy terminusof one variable region and the amino terminus of the other variableregion. Linkers of other sequences have been designed and used (Bird etal., 1988, supra). Linkers can in turn be modified for additionalfunctions, such as attachment of drugs or attachment to solid supports.The single chain antibody may be monovalent, if only a single VH and VLare used, bivalent, if two VH and VL are used, or polyvalent, if morethan two VH and VL are used. Bispecific or polyvalent antibodies may begenerated that bind specifically to glucagon receptor and to anothermolecule. The single chain variants can be produced either recombinantlyor synthetically. For synthetic production of scFv, an automatedsynthesizer can be used. For recombinant production of scFv, a suitableplasmid containing polynucleotide that encodes the scFv can beintroduced into a suitable host cell, either eukaryotic, such as yeast,plant, insect or mammalian cells, or prokaryotic, such as E. coli.Polynucleotides encoding the scFv of interest can be made by routinemanipulations such as ligation of polynucleotides. The resultant scFvcan be isolated using standard protein purification techniques known inthe art.

Other forms of single chain antibodies, such as diabodies, are alsoencompassed. Diabodies are bivalent, bispecific antibodies in which VHand VL are expressed on a single polypeptide chain, but using a linkerthat is too short to allow for pairing between the two domains on thesame chain, thereby forcing the domains to pair with complementarydomains of another chain and creating two antigen binding sites (seee.g., Holliger, P., et al., 1993, Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA90:6444-6448; Poljak, R. J., et al., 1994, Structure 2:1121-1123).

Heteroconjugate antibodies, comprising two covalently joined antibodies,are also within the scope of the invention. Such antibodies have beenused to target immune system cells to unwanted cells (U.S. Pat. No.4,676,980), and for treatment of HIV infection (PCT Publication Nos. WO91/00360 and WO 92/200373; EP 03089). Heteroconjugate antibodies may bemade using any convenient cross-linking methods. Suitable cross-linkingagents and techniques are well known in the art, and are described inU.S. Pat. No. 4,676,980.

Chimeric or hybrid antibodies also may be prepared in vitro using knownmethods of synthetic protein chemistry, including those involvingcross-linking agents. For example, immunotoxins may be constructed usinga disulfide exchange reaction or by forming a thioether bond. Examplesof suitable reagents for this purpose include iminothiolate andmethyl-4-mercaptobutyrimidate.

The invention also encompasses fusion proteins comprising one or morefragments or regions from the antibodies disclosed herein. In someembodiments, a fusion antibody may be made that comprises all or aportion of an anti-glucagon receptor antibody of the invention linked toanother polypeptide. In another embodiment, only the variable domains ofthe anti-glucagon receptor antibody are linked to the polypeptide. Inanother embodiment, the VH domain of an anti-glucagon receptor antibodyis linked to a first polypeptide, while the VL domain of ananti-glucagon receptor antibody is linked to a second polypeptide thatassociates with the first polypeptide in a manner such that the VH andVL domains can interact with one another to form an antigen bindingsite. In another preferred embodiment, the VH domain is separated fromthe VL domain by a linker such that the VH and VL domains can interactwith one another. The VH-linker-VL antibody is then linked to thepolypeptide of interest. In addition, fusion antibodies can be createdin which two (or more) single-chain antibodies are linked to oneanother. This is useful if one wants to create a divalent or polyvalentantibody on a single polypeptide chain, or if one wants to create abispecific antibody.

In some embodiments, a fusion polypeptide is provided that comprises atleast 10 contiguous amino acids of the variable light chain region shownin SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 or 42 and/or at least 10 amino acids of thevariable heavy chain region shown in SEQ ID NO: 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 or 43 .In other embodiments, a fusion polypeptide is provided that comprises atleast about 10, at least about 15, at least about 20, at least about 25,or at least about 30 contiguous amino acids of the variable light chainregion and/or at least about 10, at least about 15, at least about 20,at least about 25, or at least about 30 contiguous amino acids of thevariable heavy chain region. In another embodiment, the fusionpolypeptide comprises a light chain variable region and/or a heavy chainvariable region, as shown in any of the sequence pairs selected fromamong SEQ ID NOs: 2 and 3, 4 and 5, 6 and 7, 8 and 9, 10 and 11, and 42and 43. In another embodiment, the fusion polypeptide comprises one ormore CDR(s). In still other embodiments, the fusion polypeptidecomprises VH CDR3 and/or VL CDR3. For purposes of this invention, afusion protein contains one or more antibodies and another amino acidsequence to which it is not attached in the native molecule, forexample, a heterologous sequence or a homologous sequence from anotherregion. Exemplary heterologous sequences include, but are not limited toa “tag” such as a FLAG tag or a 6His tag. Tags are well known in theart.

A fusion polypeptide can be created by methods known in the art, forexample, synthetically or recombinantly. Typically, the fusion proteinsof this invention are made by preparing and expressing a polynucleotideencoding them using recombinant methods described herein, although theymay also be prepared by other means known in the art, including, forexample, chemical synthesis.

In other embodiments, other modified antibodies may be prepared usinganti-glucagon receptor antibody encoding nucleic acid molecules. Forinstance, “Kappa bodies” (Ill et al., 1997, Protein Eng. 10:949-57),“Minibodies” (Martin et al., 1994, EMBO J. 13:5303-9), “Diabodies”(Holliger et al., supra), or “Janusins” (Traunecker et al., 1991, EMBOJ. 10:3655-3659 and Traunecker et al., 1992, Int. J. Cancer (Suppl.)7:51-52) may be prepared using standard molecular biological techniquesfollowing the teachings of the specification.

For example, bispecific antibodies, monoclonal antibodies that havebinding specificities for at least two different antigens, can beprepared using the antibodies disclosed herein. Methods for makingbispecific antibodies are known in the art (see, e.g., Suresh et al.,1986, Methods in Enzymology 121:210). For example, bispecific antibodiesor antigen-binding fragments can be produced by fusion of hybridomas orlinking of Fab' fragments. See, e.g., Songsivilai & Lachmann, 1990,Clin. Exp. Immunol. 79:315-321, Kostelny et al., 1992, J. Immunol.148:1547-1553. Traditionally, the recombinant production of bispecificantibodies was based on the coexpression of two immunoglobulin heavychain-light chain pairs, with the two heavy chains having differentspecificities (Millstein and Cuello, 1983, Nature 305, 537-539). Inaddition, bispecific antibodies may be formed as “diabodies” or“Janusins.” In some embodiments, the bispecific antibody binds to twodifferent epitopes of glucagon receptor. In some embodiments, themodified antibodies described above are prepared using one or more ofthe variable domains or CDR regions from an anti-glucagon receptorantibody provided herein.

According to one approach to making bispecific antibodies, antibodyvariable domains with the desired binding specificities(antibody-antigen combining sites) are fused to immunoglobulin constantregion sequences. The fusion preferably is with an immunoglobulin heavychain constant region, comprising at least part of the hinge, CH2 andCH3 regions. It is preferred to have the first heavy chain constantregion (CH1), containing the site necessary for light chain binding,present in at least one of the fusions. DNAs encoding the immunoglobulinheavy chain fusions and, if desired, the immunoglobulin light chain, areinserted into separate expression vectors, and are cotransfected into asuitable host organism. This provides for great flexibility in adjustingthe mutual proportions of the three polypeptide fragments in embodimentswhen unequal ratios of the three polypeptide chains used in theconstruction provide the optimum yields. It is, however, possible toinsert the coding sequences for two or all three polypeptide chains inone expression vector when the expression of at least two polypeptidechains in equal ratios results in high yields or when the ratios are ofno particular significance.

In one approach, the bispecific antibodies are composed of a hybridimmunoglobulin heavy chain with a first binding specificity in one arm,and a hybrid immunoglobulin heavy chain-light chain pair (providing asecond binding specificity) in the other arm. This asymmetric structure,with an immunoglobulin light chain in only one half of the bispecificmolecule, facilitates the separation of the desired bispecific compoundfrom unwanted immunoglobulin chain combinations. This approach isdescribed in PCT Publication No. WO 94/04690.

This invention also provides compositions comprising antibodiesconjugated (for example, linked) to an agent that facilitate coupling toa solid support (such as biotin or avidin). For simplicity, referencewill be made generally to antibodies with the understanding that thesemethods apply to any of the glucagon receptor binding and/or antagonistembodiments described herein. Conjugation generally refers to linkingthese components as described herein. The linking (which is generallyfixing these components in proximate association at least foradministration) can be achieved in any number of ways. For example, adirect reaction between an agent and an antibody is possible when eachpossesses a substituent capable of reacting with the other. For example,a nucleophilic group, such as an amino or sulfhydryl group, on one maybe capable of reacting with a carbonyl-containing group, such as ananhydride or an acid halide, or with an alkyl group containing a goodleaving group (e.g., a halide) on the other.

The antibodies can be bound to many different carriers. Carriers can beactive and/or inert. Examples of well-known carriers includepolypropylene, polystyrene, polyethylene, dextran, nylon, amylases,glass, natural and modified celluloses, polyacrylamides, agaroses andmagnetite. The nature of the carrier can be either soluble or insolublefor purposes of the invention. Those skilled in the art will know ofother suitable carriers for binding antibodies, or will be able toascertain such, using routine experimentation. In some embodiments, thecarrier comprises a moiety that targets the lung, heart, or heart valve.

An antibody or polypeptide of this invention may be linked to a labelingagent such as a fluorescent molecule, a radioactive molecule or anyothers labels known in the art. Labels are known in the art whichgenerally provide (either directly or indirectly) a signal.

Polynucleotides, Vectors, and Host Cells

The invention also provides polynucleotides encoding any of theantibodies, including antibody fragments and modified antibodiesdescribed herein, such as, e.g., antibodies having impaired effectorfunction. In another aspect, the invention provides a method of makingany of the polynucleotides described herein. Polynucleotides can be madeand expressed by procedures known in the art. Accordingly, the inventionprovides polynucleotides or compositions, including pharmaceuticalcompositions, comprising polynucleotides, encoding any of the following:the antibodies mAb1, mAb2, mAb3, mAb4, mAb5, mAb6, LM1, LM2, LM3, LM4,LM6, LM7, LM8, LM9, LM11, HM4, HM6, HM7, HM8, HM11, and HM12, or anyfragment or part thereof having the ability to antagonize glucagonreceptor.

Polynucleotides complementary to any such sequences are also encompassedby the present invention. Polynucleotides may be single-stranded (codingor antisense) or double-stranded, and may be DNA (genomic, cDNA orsynthetic) or RNA molecules. RNA molecules include HnRNA molecules,which contain introns and correspond to a DNA molecule in a one-to-onemanner, and mRNA molecules, which do not contain introns. Additionalcoding or non-coding sequences may, but need not, be present within apolynucleotide of the present invention, and a polynucleotide may, butneed not, be linked to other molecules and/or support materials.

Polynucleotides may comprise a native sequence (i.e., an endogenoussequence that encodes an antibody or a fragment thereof) or may comprisea variant of such a sequence. Polynucleotide variants contain one ormore substitutions, additions, deletions and/or insertions such that theimmunoreactivity of the encoded polypeptide is not diminished, relativeto a native immunoreactive molecule. The effect on the immunoreactivityof the encoded polypeptide may generally be assessed as describedherein. Variants preferably exhibit at least about 70% identity, morepreferably, at least about 80% identity, yet more preferably, at leastabout 90% identity, and most preferably, at least about 95% identity toa polynucleotide sequence that encodes a native antibody or a fragmentthereof.

Two polynucleotide or polypeptide sequences are said to be “identical”if the sequence of nucleotides or amino acids in the two sequences isthe same when aligned for maximum correspondence as described below.Comparisons between two sequences are typically performed by comparingthe sequences over a comparison window to identify and compare localregions of sequence similarity. A “comparison window” as used herein,refers to a segment of at least about 20 contiguous positions, usually30 to about 75, or 40 to about 50, in which a sequence may be comparedto a reference sequence of the same number of contiguous positions afterthe two sequences are optimally aligned.

Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison may be conducted using theMegAlign® program in the Lasergene® suite of bioinformatics software(DNASTAR®, Inc., Madison, Wis.), using default parameters. This programembodies several alignment schemes described in the followingreferences: Dayhoff, M. O., 1978, A model of evolutionary change inproteins—Matrices for detecting distant relationships. In Dayhoff, M. O.(ed.) Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, National BiomedicalResearch Foundation, Washington DC Vol. 5, Suppl. 3, pp. 345-358; HeinJ., 1990, Unified Approach to Alignment and Phylogenes pp. 626-645Methods in Enzymology vol. 183, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.;Higgins, D. G. and Sharp, P. M., 1989, CABIOS 5:151-153; Myers, E. W.and Muller W., 1988, CABIOS 4:11-17; Robinson, E. D., 1971, Comb. Theor.11:105; Santou, N., Nes, M., 1987, Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425; Sneath,P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R., 1973, Numerical Taxonomy the Principles andPractice of Numerical Taxonomy, Freeman Press, San Francisco, Calif.;Wilbur, W. J. and Lipman, D. J., 1983, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA80:726-730.

Preferably, the “percentage of sequence identity” is determined bycomparing two optimally aligned sequences over a window of comparison ofat least 20 positions, wherein the portion of the polynucleotide orpolypeptide sequence in the comparison window may comprise additions ordeletions (i.e., gaps) of 20 percent or less, usually 5 to 15 percent,or 10 to 12 percent, as compared to the reference sequences (which doesnot comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of the twosequences. The percentage is calculated by determining the number ofpositions at which the identical nucleic acid bases or amino acidresidue occurs in both sequences to yield the number of matchedpositions, dividing the number of matched positions by the total numberof positions in the reference sequence (i.e. the window size) andmultiplying the results by 100 to yield the percentage of sequenceidentity.

Variants may also, or alternatively, be substantially homologous to anative gene, or a portion or complement thereof. Such polynucleotidevariants are capable of hybridizing under moderately stringentconditions to a naturally occurring DNA sequence encoding a nativeantibody (or a complementary sequence).

Suitable “moderately stringent conditions” include prewashing in asolution of 5 × SSC, 0.5% SDS, 1.0 mM EDTA (pH 8.0); hybridizing at 50°C.-65° C., 5 × SSC, overnight; followed by washing twice at 65° C. for20 minutes with each of 2×, 0.5× and 0.2× SSC containing 0.1% SDS.

As used herein, “highly stringent conditions” or “high stringencyconditions” are those that: (1) employ low ionic strength and hightemperature for washing, for example 0.015 M sodium chloride/0.0015 Msodium citrate/0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at 50° C.; (2) employ duringhybridization a denaturing agent, such as formamide, for example, 50%(v/v) formamide with 0.1% bovine serum albumin/0.1% Ficoll/0.1%polyvinylpyrrolidone/50 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.5 with 750 mMsodium chloride, 75 mM sodium citrate at 42° C.; or (3) employ 50%formamide, 5× SSC (0.75 M NaCl, 0.075 M sodium citrate), 50 mM sodiumphosphate (pH 6.8), 0.1% sodium pyrophosphate, 5× Denhardt's solution,sonicated salmon sperm DNA (50 μg/ml), 0.1% SDS, and 10% dextran sulfateat 42° C., with washes at 42° C. in 0.2× SSC (sodium chloride/sodiumcitrate) and 50% formamide at 55° C., followed by a high-stringency washconsisting of 0.1× SSC containing EDTA at 55° C. The skilled artisanwill recognize how to adjust the temperature, ionic strength, etc. asnecessary to accommodate factors such as probe length and the like.

It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that, as aresult of the degeneracy of the genetic code, there are many nucleotidesequences that encode a polypeptide as described herein. Some of thesepolynucleotides bear minimal homology to the nucleotide sequence of anynative gene. Nonetheless, polynucleotides that vary due to differencesin codon usage are specifically contemplated by the present invention.Further, alleles of the genes comprising the polynucleotide sequencesprovided herein are within the scope of the present invention. Allelesare endogenous genes that are altered as a result of one or moremutations, such as deletions, additions and/or substitutions ofnucleotides. The resulting mRNA and protein may, but need not, have analtered structure or function. Alleles may be identified using standardtechniques (such as hybridization, amplification and/or databasesequence comparison).

The polynucleotides of this invention can be obtained using chemicalsynthesis, recombinant methods, or PCR. Methods of chemicalpolynucleotide synthesis are well known in the art and need not bedescribed in detail herein. One of skill in the art can use thesequences provided herein and a commercial DNA synthesizer to produce adesired DNA sequence.

For preparing polynucleotides using recombinant methods, apolynucleotide comprising a desired sequence can be inserted into asuitable vector, and the vector in turn can be introduced into asuitable host cell for replication and amplification, as furtherdiscussed herein. Polynucleotides may be inserted into host cells by anymeans known in the art. Cells are transformed by introducing anexogenous polynucleotide by direct uptake, endocytosis, transfection,F-mating or electroporation. Once introduced, the exogenouspolynucleotide can be maintained within the cell as a non-integratedvector (such as a plasmid) or integrated into the host cell genome. Thepolynucleotide so amplified can be isolated from the host cell bymethods well known within the art. See, e.g., Sambrook et al., 1989.

Alternatively, PCR allows reproduction of DNA sequences. PCR technologyis well known in the art and is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,195,4,800,159, 4,754,065 and 4,683,202, as well as PCR: The Polymerase ChainReaction, Mullis et al. eds., Birkauswer Press, Boston, 1994.

RNA can be obtained by using the isolated DNA in an appropriate vectorand inserting it into a suitable host cell. When the cell replicates andthe DNA is transcribed into RNA, the RNA can then be isolated usingmethods well known to those of skill in the art, as set forth inSambrook et al., 1989, supra, for example.

Suitable cloning vectors may be constructed according to standardtechniques, or may be selected from a large number of cloning vectorsavailable in the art. While the cloning vector selected may varyaccording to the host cell intended to be used, useful cloning vectorswill generally have the ability to self-replicate, may possess a singletarget for a particular restriction endonuclease, and/or may carry genesfor a marker that can be used in selecting clones containing the vector.Suitable examples include plasmids and bacterial viruses, e.g., pUC18,pUC19, Bluescript (e.g., pBS SK+) and its derivatives, mp18, mp19,pBR322, μmB9, ColE1, pCR1, RP4, phage DNAs, and shuttle vectors such aspSA3 and pAT28. These and many other cloning vectors are available fromcommercial vendors such as BioRad, Strategene, and Invitrogen.

Expression vectors are further provided. Expression vectors generallyare replicable polynucleotide constructs that contain a polynucleotideaccording to the invention. It is implied that an expression vector mustbe replicable in the host cells either as episomes or as an integralpart of the chromosomal DNA. Suitable expression vectors include but arenot limited to plasmids, viral vectors, including adenoviruses,adeno-associated viruses, retroviruses, cosm ids, and expressionvector(s) disclosed in PCT Publication No. WO 87/04462. Vectorcomponents may generally include, but are not limited to, one or more ofthe following: a signal sequence; an origin of replication; one or moremarker genes; suitable transcriptional controlling elements (such aspromoters, enhancers and terminator). For expression (i.e.,translation), one or more translational controlling elements are alsousually required, such as ribosome binding sites, translation initiationsites, and stop codons.

The vectors containing the polynucleotides of interest can be introducedinto the host cell by any of a number of appropriate means, includingelectroporation, transfection employing calcium chloride, rubidiumchloride, calcium phosphate, DEAE-dextran, or other substances;microprojectile bombardment; lipofection; and infection (e.g., where thevector is an infectious agent such as vaccinia virus). The choice ofintroducing vectors or polynucleotides will often depend on features ofthe host cell.

The invention also provides host cells comprising any of thepolynucleotides described herein. Any host cells capable ofover-expressing heterologous DNAs can be used for the purpose ofisolating the genes encoding the antibody, polypeptide or protein ofinterest. Non-limiting examples of mammalian host cells include but notlimited to COS, HeLa, and CHO cells. See also PCT Publication No. WO87/04462. Suitable non-mammalian host cells include prokaryotes (such asE. coli or B. subtillis) and yeast (such as S. cerevisae, S. pombe; orK. lactis). Preferably, the host cells express the cDNAs at a level ofabout 5 fold higher, more preferably, 10 fold higher, even morepreferably, 20 fold higher than that of the corresponding endogenousantibody or protein of interest, if present, in the host cells.Screening the host cells for a specific binding to glucagon receptor ora glucagon receptor domain is effected by an immunoassay or FACS. A celloverexpressing the antibody or protein of interest can be identified.

An expression vector can be used to direct expression of ananti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody. One skilled in the art isfamiliar with administration of expression vectors to obtain expressionof an exogenous protein in vivo. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,436,908;6,413,942; and 6,376,471. Administration of expression vectors includeslocal or systemic administration, including injection, oraladministration, particle gun or catheterized administration, and topicaladministration. In another embodiment, the expression vector isadministered directly to the sympathetic trunk or ganglion, or into acoronary artery, atrium, ventrical, or pericardium.

Targeted delivery of therapeutic compositions containing an expressionvector, or subgenomic polynucleotides can also be used.Receptor-mediated DNA delivery techniques are described in, for example,Findeis et al., Trends Biotechnol., 1993, 11:202; Chiou et al., GeneTherapeutics: Methods And Applications Of Direct Gene Transfer, J. A.Wolff, ed., 1994; Wu et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1988, 263:621; Wu et al.,J. Biol. Chem., 1994, 269:542; Zenke et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,1990, 87:3655; Wu et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1991, 266:338. Therapeuticcompositions containing a polynucleotide are administered in a range ofabout 100 ng to about 200 mg of DNA for local administration in a genetherapy protocol. Concentration ranges of about 500 ng to about 50 mg,about 1 μg to about 2 mg, about 5 μg to about 500 μg, and about 20 μg toabout 100 μg of DNA can also be used during a gene therapy protocol. Thetherapeutic polynucleotides and polypeptides can be delivered using genedelivery vehicles. The gene delivery vehicle can be of viral ornon-viral origin (see generally, Jolly, Cancer Gene Therapy, 1994, 1:51;Kimura, Human Gene Therapy, 1994, 5:845; Connelly, Human Gene Therapy,1995, 1:185; and Kaplitt, Nature Genetics, 1994, 6:148). Expression ofsuch coding sequences can be induced using endogenous mammalian orheterologous promoters. Expression of the coding sequence can be eitherconstitutive or regulated.

Viral-based vectors for delivery of a desired polynucleotide andexpression in a desired cell are well known in the art. Exemplaryviral-based vehicles include, but are not limited to, recombinantretroviruses (see, e.g., PCT Publication Nos. WO 90/07936; WO 94/03622;WO 93/25698; WO 93/25234; WO 93/11230; WO 93/10218; WO 91/02805; U.S.Pat. Nos. 5, 219,740 and 4,777,127; GB Patent No. 2,200,651; and EPPatent No. 0 345 242), alphavirus-based vectors (e.g., Sindbis virusvectors, Semliki forest virus (ATCC VR-67; ATCC VR-1247), Ross Rivervirus (ATCC VR-373; ATCC VR-1246) and Venezuelan equine encephalitisvirus (ATCC VR-923; ATCC VR-1250; ATCC VR 1249; ATCC VR-532)), andadeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors (see, e.g., PCT Publication Nos. WO94/12649, WO 93/03769; WO 93/19191; WO 94/28938; WO 95/11984 and WO95/00655). Administration of DNA linked to killed adenovirus asdescribed in Curiel, Hum. Gene Ther., 1992, 3:147 can also be employed.

Non-viral delivery vehicles and methods can also be employed, including,but not limited to, polycationic condensed DNA linked or unlinked tokilled adenovirus alone (see, e.g., Curiel, Hum. Gene Ther., 1992,3:147); ligand-linked DNA (see, e.g., Wu, J. Biol. Chem., 1989,264:16985); eukaryotic cell delivery vehicles cells (see, e.g., U.S.Pat. No. 5,814,482; PCT Publication Nos. WO 95/07994; WO 96/17072; WO95/30763; and WO 97/42338) and nucleic charge neutralization or fusionwith cell membranes. Naked DNA can also be employed. Exemplary naked DNAintroduction methods are described in PCT Publication No. WO 90/11092and U.S. Pat. No. 5,580,859. Liposomes that can act as gene deliveryvehicles are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,422,120; PCT Publication Nos.WO 95/13796; WO 94/23697; WO 91/14445; and EP 0524968. Additionalapproaches are described in Philip, Mol. Cell Biol., 1994, 14:2411, andin Woffendin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1994, 91:1581.

Compositions

The invention also provides pharmaceutical compositions comprising aneffective amount of an anti-glucagon receptor antibody described herein.Examples of such compositions, as well as how to formulate, are alsodescribed herein. In some embodiments, the composition comprises one ormore glucagon receptor antibodies. In other embodiments, theanti-glucagon receptor antibody recognizes glucagon receptor. In otherembodiments, the anti-glucagon receptor antibody is a human antibody. Inother embodiments, the anti-glucagon receptor antibody is a humanizedantibody. In some embodiments, the anti-glucagon receptor antibodycomprises a constant region that is capable of triggering a desiredimmune response, such as antibody-mediated lysis or ADCC. In otherembodiments, the anti-glucagon receptor antibody comprises a constantregion that does not trigger an unwanted or undesirable immune response,such as antibody-mediated lysis or ADCC. In other embodiments, theanti-glucagon receptor antibody comprises one or more CDR(s) of theantibody (such as one, two, three, four, five, or, in some embodiments,all six CDRs).

It is understood that the compositions can comprise more than oneanti-glucagon receptor antibody (e.g., a mixture of glucagon receptorantibodies that recognize different epitopes of glucagon receptor).Other exemplary compositions comprise more than one anti-glucagonreceptor antibody that recognize the same epitope(s), or differentspecies of anti-glucagon receptor antibodies that bind to differentepitopes of glucagon receptor. In some embodiments, the compositionscomprise a mixture of anti-glucagon receptor antibodies that recognizedifferent variants of glucagon receptor.

The composition used in the present invention can further comprisepharmaceutically acceptable carriers, excipients, or stabilizers(Remington: The Science and practice of Pharmacy 20th Ed., 2000,Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Ed. K. E. Hoover), in the form oflyophilized formulations or aqueous solutions. Acceptable carriers,excipients, or stabilizers are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages andconcentrations, and may comprise buffers such as phosphate, citrate, andother organic acids; antioxidants including ascorbic acid andmethionine; preservatives (such as octadecyldimethylbenzyl ammoniumchloride; hexamethonium chloride; benzalkonium chloride, benzethoniumchloride; phenol, butyl or benzyl alcohol; alkyl parabens such as methylor propyl paraben; catechol; resorcinol; cyclohexanol; 3-pentanol; andm-cresol); low molecular weight (less than about 10 residues)polypeptides; proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, orimmunoglobulins; hydrophilic polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone;amino acids such as glycine, glutamine, asparagine, histidine, arginine,or lysine; monosaccharides, disaccharides, and other carbohydratesincluding glucose, mannose, or dextrans; chelating agents such as EDTA;sugars such as sucrose, mannitol, trehalose or sorbitol; salt-formingcounter-ions such as sodium; metal complexes (e.g. Zn-proteincomplexes); and/or non-ionic surfactants such as TWEEN™, PLURONICS™ orpolyethylene glycol (PEG). Pharmaceutically acceptable excipients arefurther described herein.

The anti-glucagon receptor antibody and compositions thereof can also beused in conjunction with other agents that serve to enhance and/orcomplement the effectiveness of the agents.

The invention also provides compositions, including pharmaceuticalcompositions, comprising any of the polynucleotides of the invention. Insome embodiments, the composition comprises an expression vectorcomprising a polynucleotide encoding the antibody as described herein.In other embodiment, the composition comprises an expression vectorcomprising a polynucleotide encoding any of the antibodies describedherein.

Kits

The invention also provides kits comprising any or all of the antibodiesdescribed herein. Kits of the invention include one or more containerscomprising an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody describedherein and instructions for use in accordance with any of the methods ofthe invention described herein. Generally, these instructions comprise adescription of administration of the anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody for the above described therapeutic treatments. In someembodiments, kits are provided for producing a single-doseadministration unit. In certain embodiments, the kit can contain both afirst container having a dried protein and a second container having anaqueous formulation. In certain embodiments, kits containing single andmulti-chambered pre-filled syringes (e.g., liquid syringes andlyosyringes) are included.

In some embodiments, the antibody is a human antibody. In someembodiments, the antibody is a humanized antibody. In some embodiments,the antibody is a monoclonal antibody. The instructions relating to theuse of an anti-glucagon receptor antibody generally include informationas to dosage, dosing schedule, and route of administration for theintended treatment. The containers may be unit doses, bulk packages(e.g., multi-dose packages) or sub-unit doses. Instructions supplied inthe kits of the invention are typically written instructions on a labelor package insert (e.g., a paper sheet included in the kit), butmachine-readable instructions (e.g., instructions carried on a magneticor optical storage disk) are also acceptable.

The kits of this invention are in suitable packaging. Suitable packagingincludes, but is not limited to, vials, bottles, jars, flexiblepackaging (e.g., sealed Mylar or plastic bags), and the like. Alsocontemplated are packages for use in combination with a specific device,such as an inhaler, nasal administration device (e.g., an atomizer) oran infusion device such as a minipump. A kit may have a sterile accessport (for example the container may be an intravenous solution bag or avial having a stopper pierceable by a hypodermic injection needle). Thecontainer may also have a sterile access port (for example the containermay be an intravenous solution bag or a vial having a stopper pierceableby a hypodermic injection needle). At least one active agent in thecomposition is an anti-glucagon receptor antibody. The container mayfurther comprise a second pharmaceutically active agent.

Kits may optionally provide additional components such as buffers andinterpretive information. Normally, the kit comprises a container and alabel or package insert(s) on or associated with the container.

Biological Deposit

Representative materials of the present invention were deposited in theAmerican Type Culture Collection, 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas,Va. 20110-2209, USA, on Jan. 29, 2013. Vector mAb5-LC having ATCCAccession No. PTA-120164 is a polynucleotide encoding the mAb5 lightchain variable region, and vector mAb5-HC having ATCC Accession No.PTA-120165 is a polynucleotide encoding the mAb5 heavy chain variableregion. The deposits were made under the provisions of the BudapestTreaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganismsfor the Purpose of Patent Procedure and Regulations thereunder (BudapestTreaty). This assures maintenance of a viable culture of the deposit for30 years from the date of deposit. The deposit will be made available byATCC under the terms of the Budapest Treaty, and subject to an agreementbetween Pfizer, Inc. and ATCC, which assures permanent and unrestrictedavailability of the progeny of the culture of the deposit to the publicupon issuance of the pertinent U.S. patent or upon laying open to thepublic of any U.S. or foreign patent application, whichever comes first,and assures availability of the progeny to one determined by the U.S.Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to be entitled thereto accordingto 35 U.S.C. Section 122 and the Commissioner's rules pursuant thereto(including 37 C.F.R. Section 1.14 with particular reference to 886 OG638).

The assignee of the present application has agreed that if a culture ofthe materials on deposit should die or be lost or destroyed whencultivated under suitable conditions, the materials will be promptlyreplaced on notification with another of the same. Availability of thedeposited material is not to be construed as a license to practice theinvention in contravention of the rights granted under the authority ofany government in accordance with its patent laws.

The following examples are offered for illustrative purposes only, andare not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way.Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to thoseshown and described herein will become apparent to those skilled in theart from the foregoing description and fall within the scope of theappended claims.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Determining Antibody Kinetics and Binding Affinity

This Example illustrates the determination of antibody kinetics andbinding affinities of anti-glucagon receptor antibodies to human andcynomolgus monkey (cyno) glucagon receptor.

An anti-human Fc sensor chip was prepared by activating all flow cellsof a Biacore CM4 sensor chip with a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of 400 mM EDC and100 mM NHS for 7 minutes, at a flow rate of 10 μL/min. Goat anti-humanFc antibody (Southern Biotech) was diluted to 50 μg/mL in 10 mM sodiumacetate pH 5.0 and injected on all flow cells for 7 minutes at 20μL/min. All flow cells were blocked with 100 mM ethylenediamine in 150mM borate buffer pH 8.5 for 7 minutes at 10 μL/min. The running bufferfor this immobilization procedure was 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05%(v/v) TWEEN® 20, pH 7.4.

The following kinetics experiments were performed at 25° C. and 37° C.using a running buffer of 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% (v/v) TWEEN®20, pH 7.4, 1 mg/mL BSA.

All experiments were performed on a Biacore™ T200 surface Plasmonresonance biosensor (GE Lifesciences, Piscataway N.J.). Human andcynomolgus monkey (cyno) glucagon receptor extracellular domain human Fcfusion proteins were captured onto downstream flow cells (flow cells 2,3, respectively) at 2 μg/mL at a flow rate of 10 μL/min for 3 minutes.Flow cell 1 was used as a blank reference surface. Following capture ofglucagon receptor Fc fusion proteins, analyte (buffer, or mAb5 Fab) wasinjected at 30 μL/min on all flow cells for two minutes. Multiple mAb5Fab analyte concentrations were tested. The mAb5 Fab analyteconcentrations were 0.16, 0.8, 4, 20 and 100 nM. After the analyteinjection, dissociation was monitored for 10 minutes (for the 20 nM and100 nM mAb5 Fab analyte samples) or 30 seconds (for the 0.16, 0.8, and 4nM mAb5 Fab analyte samples). Dissociation was monitored for 30 secondsand 10 minutes for buffer analyte cycles. Following analyte binding anddissociation all flow cells were regenerated with four 1-minuteinjections of 75 mM phosphoric acid. The sensorgram data were doublereferenced prior to curve fitting (double referencing as described inMyszka, D. G., 1999, J. Mol. Recognit., 12:279-284. The doublereferenced sensorgrams were fit globally to a simple 1:1 Langmuir withmass transport binding model using the Biacore™ T200 evaluationsoftware. The binding affinity data for anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody mAb5 binding to human and cyno glucagon receptor areshown below in Table 4.

TABLE 4 25° C. 37° C. k_(a) t_(1/2) K_(D) k_(a) t_(1/2) K_(D) Receptor(1/Ms) k_(d) (1/s) (min) (nM) (1/Ms) k_(d) (1/s) (min) (nM) Human 4.6 ×10⁵ 1.0 × 10⁻⁴ 116 0.22 6.5 × 10⁵ 4.9 × 10⁻⁴ 24 0.75 glucagon receptorCyno 5.0 × 10⁵ <8.5 × 10⁻⁵* >136* <0.17* 7.5 × 10⁵ 5.4 × 10⁻⁴ 21 0.72glucagon receptor *Dissociation rate was too low to determine a precisek_(d) value under the given experimental conditions; therefore limitsare reported for k_(d), t_(1/2) and K_(D).

Example 2 Cell Based Functional Assay

This Example illustrates the effect of anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody mAb5 on glucagon signaling in cells expressing human glucagonreceptor.

For this study, cAMP signaling was measured in a CHO cell line stablytransfected with human glucagon receptor, using a LANCE® cAMP kit (cat#AD0262E, PerkinElmer Inc.). Cells were added to a 96-well plate andincubated with serially diluted mAb5. Cells were then stimulated with200 μm glucagon (cat #22456, AnaSpec, Inc.) for 30 minutes at roomtemperature (RT). Detection antibody was then added and incubated for 10minutes at RT. Cells were then lysed with supplied detection buffer andincubated in the dark for 3 hours at RT. The plate was then read on aVICTOR3™ plate reader (PerkinElmer, Inc). The results are shown inFIG. 1. As the readout of this assay is based on competition between alabeled, exogenous cAMP (measured at 665 nm) and unlabeled, endogenouslygenerated cAMP, higher signals indicate less cAMP generated by thecells. mAb5 inhibits cAMP generation in a dose-dependent fashion (FIG.1).

These results demonstrate that anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody mAb5 inhibits the glucagon receptor-mediated cAMP increaseafter glucagon stimulation.

Example 3 In Vivo Efficacy in Cynomolpus Monkey

This Example illustrates the effect of anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody on plasma glucose levels after glucagon challenge in cynomolgusmonkeys.

Administration of an intravenous bolus of glucagon to animals leads toan elevation in plasma glucose as a result of glucagon signaling at theliver. To determine whether anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodyinhibits this rise in plasma glucose, a glucagon challenge was performedin naïve, female, cynomolgus monkeys given either anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody or PBS. The glucagon challenge was performed in themonkeys on two separate occasions: one glucagon challenge was performedfive days before the monkeys received either a single intravenous doseof mAb5 at 3 mg/kg or equivalent volume of PBS (baseline), and a secondglucagon challenge was performed one hour after the monkeys received themAb5 dose or PBS.

For each glucagon challenge, an intravenous bolus of 20 μg/kg glucagon(GlucaGen® Hypokits®) was administered at time 0. Blood samples weretaken from all animals at the following timepoints: pre-challenge, andat 5, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 minutes post-challenge. Plasma samples wereanalyzed for plasma glucose concentrations using a clinical chemistryanalyzer. Mean absolute glucose values (mg/dL)+/−SEM and AUC (area underthe curve reflecting excursion in plasma glucose over time) are shown inTable 5.

TABLE 5 Mean plasma glucose concentration (mg/dL) Treatment Time (mins)relative to glucagon administration Group Pre- 5 15 30 mAb5 3 mg/kg (n =6) Glucagon 83.67 +/− 3.13 106.50 +/− 3.91  115.67 +/− 5.04  102.17 +/−3.97  challenge (GC) at baseline GC 1 hr 78.83 +/− 5.44 92.00 +/− 4.8881.33 +/− 5.54 69.00 +/− 4.66 post- mAb5 PBS control (n = 6) GC at 89.17+/− 8.24 135.33 +/− 11.31  140.0 +/− 10.45 100.67 +/− 11.46 baseline GC1 hr  84.5 +/− 4.36 109.0 +/− 6.98 118.5 +/− 9.79 107.17 +/− 12.30post-PBS Mean plasma glucose concentration (mg/dL) Treatment Time (mins)relative to glucagon administration Group 45 60 120 AUC mAb5 3 mg/kg (n= 6) Glucagon 91.0 +/− 4.29 89.17 +/− 4.01 85.67 +/− 6.08 11265 +/−373.5 challenge (GC) at baseline GC 1 hr 63.83 +/− 2.36  63.17 +/− 3.1561.67 +/− 3.55  8115 +/− 316.8 post- mAb5 PBS control (n = 6) GC at83.67 +/− 5.875 81.00 +/− 4.90 65.33 +/− 3.40 11033 +/− 1042  baselineGC 1 hr 98.33 +/− 12.08  92.67 +/− 12.64 65.50 +/− 5.03 10751 +/− 607.2post-PBS

Animals treated with 3 mg/kg mAb5 one hour prior to glucagon challengehad a mean plasma glucose concentration of 78.83+/−5.44 pre-challenge,92.00 +/−4.88 mg/dL five minutes after challenge, 81.33+/−5.54 mg/dLfifteen minutes after challenge, 69.00+/−4.66 mg/dL thirty minutes afterchallenge, 63.83+/−2.36 mg/dL forty-five minutes after challenge, and63.17+/−3.15 mg/dL sixty minutes after challenge (Table 5). In contrast,animals administered PBS one hour prior to glucagon challenge had a meanplasma glucose concentration of 84.5+/−4.36 pre-challenge, 109.0+/−6.98mg/dL five minutes after challenge, 118.5+/−9.79 mg/dL fifteen minutesafter challenge, 107.17+/−12.30 mg/dL thirty minutes after challenge,98.33+/−12.08 mg/dL forty-five minutes after challenge, and92.67+/−12.64 mg/dL sixty minutes after challenge (Table 5). Thus, afterglucagon challenge, plasma glucose levels are substantially lower inanimals treated with anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody Mab 5compared to PBS control.

These results demonstrate that anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody effectively blocks glucose excursion after glucagon challenge.

Example 4 Liver Function Analysis After Treatment

This example illustrates the effect of chronic treatment with mAb5glucagon receptor blocking mAb, at a high dose.

Previous clinical data in humans has demonstrated that 4-week treatmentwith a glucagon receptor small molecule antagonist can lead toelevations in certain liver functions tests (LFT's), specificallyalanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (LYand MK). See, e.g., Engel, S., et al., 2011, “Efficacy and tolerabilityof MK0893, a glucagon receptor antagonist, in patients with type 2diabetes,” ADA Symposium. To address whether such changes would beevident following long term treatment where the glucagon receptor wasblocked with a monoclonal antibody rather than a small molecule, a studywas conducted to evaluate the effects on these LFT parameters of weekly,intravenous bolus doses of mAb5 in cynomolgus monkeys, over 4 weeks.

As shown above in Example 3, a single dose of 3 mg/kg mAb5 effectivelyinhibits glucose excursion after glucagon challenge in cynomolgusmonkeys. For the liver fuction study, a dose of 100 mg/kg was chosen toensure full blocking at all times. Three lean, naïve, female monkeysreceived 100 mg/kg mAb5 on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. As a control, threelean, naïve, female monkeys received an IV bolus of PBS control on days1, 8, 15 and 22. Fasting serum samples were collected from all animals,from both groups, on days 7, 14, 21 and 29 and compared againstbaseline, pre-treatment samples taken from the same animals beforestudy-start (day—6). In addition to ALT and AST, alkaline phosphatase(ALP) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) were also measured, using aclinical chemistry analyzer. The ALT, AST ALP and GGT test results areshown in FIGS. 2 and 3, and summarized below in Table 6.

TABLE 6 PBS control mAB5 100 mg/kg Baseline Day 29 Baseline Day 29 ALT65.3 +/− 5.17  58.0 +/− 11.02  72.3 +/− 24.38  57.7 +/− 24.66 (U/L) AST 39.7 +/− 11.26 39.0 +/− 8.19 39.7 +/− 5.48 31.3 +/− 5.93 (U/L) ALP274.3 +/− 47.42 207.3 +/− 42.91 310.3 +/− 87.62 234.0 +/− 41.14 (U/L)GGT 84.0 +/− 4.36 83.3 +/− 4.41 81.3 +/− 3.48 80.0 +/− 3.22 (U/L)

Table 6 shows the mean (+/−SEM) values for these parameters at baseline(day—6) and at the end of study (day 29). As seen in Table 6, there wereno significant changes in any of the LFT parameters measured in animalstreated with mAb5 (last column) compared to the PBS control animals andbaseline group animals.

These results demonstrate that chronic treatment with high dose mAb5glucagon receptor blocking antibody is not deleterious to liverfunction.

Example 5 Circulating Lipid Level Analysis After Treatment

This example illustrates that chronic treatment with mAb5 glucagonreceptor blocking mAb, at a high dose, does not elicit changes in plasmalipids in cynomolgus monkeys.

Previous clinical data in humans has demonstrated that 4-week treatmentwith a glucagon receptor small molecule antagonist was associated withdose-dependent, 10-17% elevations in LDL-cholesterol levels (MK). See,e.g., Ruddy, M. et al., 2011, “Inhibition of glucagon-inducedhyperglycemia predicts glucose-lowering efficacy of the glucagonreceptor antagonist, MK0893, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM),” ADA Symposium. To address whether such changes would be evidentfollowing long term treatment where the glucagon receptor was blockedwith a monoclonal antibody rather than a small molecule, a study wasconducted to evaluate the effects on LDL-C and other circulating lipids(total cholesterol, HDL-C and triglycerides) after weekly, intravenousbolus doses of mAb5 in cynomolgus monkeys, over 4 weeks.

Three, lean, naïve, female monkeys received 100 mg/kg mAb5 on days 1, 8,15 and 22. For a control, three, lean, naïve, female monkeys received anIV bolus of PBS control at the same time-points. Fasting serum sampleswere collected from all animals, from both groups, on days 7, 14, 21 and29 and compared against baseline, pre-treatment samples (day—6) takenfrom the same animals before study-start, and lipids were measured usinga clinical chemistry analyzer. The data from this study are summarizedin Table 7 and shown in FIGS. 4 and 5.

TABLE 7 PBS Control mAb5 100 mg/kg Day −6 Day 29 Day −6 Day 29 Total90.3 +/− 101.0 +/− 6.25  114.3 +/− 20.46 121.0 +/− 19.67 cholesterol7.79 (mg/dL) LDL-C 28.3 +/− 31.7 +/− 6.49  44.0 +/− 12.06  43.7 +/−13.19 (mg/dL) 6.69 HDL-C 48.0 +/− 52.0 +/− 1.53 56.0 +/− 7.81 62.0 +/−6.35 (mg/dL) 2.08 Triglycerides 72.0 +/−  73.7 +/− 16.49  59.7 +/− 12.2058.3 +/− 2.33 (mg/dL) 4.51

Table 7 shows the mean (+/−SEM) values for these parameters at baseline(day—6) and at the end of study (day 29). FIGS. 4 and 5 show the plasmalipid levels in the control and mAb5-treated animals at days—6, 7, 14,21 and 29. No changes were observed in any of the circulating lipidparameters measured in the mAb5 treated animals, when compared to thePBS control animals and baseline group animals.

These results demonstrate that chronic treatment with high dose of mAb5anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody is not associated withelevated LDL-cholesterol.

Example 6 In Vivo Efficacy in a Mouse Model of Type 2 Diabetes

This example illustrates treatment with an anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes.

Administration of an intra-peritoneal bolus of glucose (glucosechallenge) in fasted mice leads to a marked elevation, followed by aclearance period, in plasma glucose. Both the fasting plasma glucoselevels, i.e., immediately prior to challenge, and the ability to handlethe administered glucose load are impaired in high fat diet-fed, DIO(diet-induced obese) mice. Pre-treatment of these animals with ananti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody, mAb3, was carried out asfollows: starting from 6 weeks of age, C57B1/6J mice (n=5 per group)were fed a high fat diet (“HFD”, 40 kcal % fat). From 12 weeks of age,the mice continued on HFD and one group received a once weekly,intra-peritoneal injection of 3 mg/kg mAb3, while the second groupreceived a similar volume of PBS vehicle. After 3 weeks of treatment,and following an 18 hour, overnight fast, an intra-peritoneal bolus ofglucose (2 g/kg) was administered to all animals (time=0). Blood sampleswere taken from all animals at the following timepoints: pre-challenge,and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes post-challenge. Whole bloodsamples were analyzed for plasma glucose concentrations using ahand-held One Touch® glucometer. Mean absolute glucose values(mg/dL)+/−SEM and AUC (area under the curve reflecting excursion inplasma glucose over time) are shown in Table 8.

TABLE 8 Mean Absolute Glucose Values (mg/dL) Fasting, pre- Time afterglucose challenge (minutes) Group challenge 15 30 45 60 90 120 AUC mAb3128.80 +/− 426.00 +/− 327.80 +/− 287.00 +/− 20.82 280.20 +/− 18.72255.60 +/− 17.93 184.20 +/− 10.94 33,313.8 +/− 1,542 3 mg/kg 12.92 33.9020.65 PBS 156.80 +/− 549.60 +/− 594.20 +/− 548.00 +/− 18.17 536.00 +/−21.46 411.40 +/− 24.39 313.40 +/− 20.88 55,656.2 +/− 1790  11.41 15.595.31

Animals treated with anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb3 hada fasting blood glucose level of 128.80+/−12.92 mg/dL, significantlylower than the fasting blood glucose level in control animals given PBS,156.80+/−11.41 mg/dL (Table 8, column 2). Furthermore, animals treatedwith mAb3 had lower blood glucose levels post-glucose challenge comparedto animals given PBS (Table 8, columns 3-9). These results demonstratethat anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody reduces fasting bloodglucose and excursion in plasma glucose elicited upon glucose challengein a mouse model of type 2 diabetes.

Example 7 Combination Treatment

This example illustrates combination treatment with an anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody and an mTOR inhibitor in mice.

Blocking glucagon signaling in rodents has been previously demonstratedto cause a resultant increase in the number and/or size of pancreaticalpha (i.e., glucagon-producing) cells. See, e.g., Gelling et al., 2003,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(3):1438-1443 (GCGR null mice); Sloop etal., 2004, J. Clin. Invest. 113(11): 1571-1581 (antisenseoligonucleotids). Administration of anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody mAb3 (once weekly i.p.) in mice has similarly been shown toincrease the area of alpha cells per islet, reflecting an increase inalpha cell number as well as an increase in average alpha cell size.

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the mTORinhibitor rapamycin as a co-treatment with mAb3. In this study, male, 14week old, C57B1/6J mice (n=10 per group) received either once weekly,intra-peritoneal injection of 3 mg/kg mAb3, or daily, intra-peritonealdosing of 10 mg/kg rapamycin (formulated in 5% ethanol, 5.2% Tween-80,5.2% PEG 400 in water), in combination with a once weekly 3 mg/kg doseof mAb3. A third group received vehicle as a control. After three weeksof treatment, the animals were sacrificed and their pancreata collected,fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 hours, and then processedin paraffin wax and embedded following standard procedures. Sectionswere cut at 4 μm, mounted on plus slides and dried overnight at 37° C.Glucagon (to identify islet alpha cells) and insulin (to identify isletbeta cells), were detected in the pancreas by immunohistochemistry usinga sequential double labeling protocol on a Leica Bond™ automatedimmunostainer (Leica Microsystems, IL). Endogenous proteins were blockedwith Cyto-Q Background Buster (Innovex Biosciences, Calif.). Antigenretrieval was performed for anti-glucagon immunohistochemistry usingheat induced epitope retrieval (HIER) buffer at pH 6.0 (LeicaMicrosystems, Ill.) for 20 min. Anti-insulin (Dako, Calif.) weredetected using biotinylated goat anti-guinea pig IgG (Dako, Calif.) withBond™ Intense R Detection (Leica Microsystems) and anti-glucagon (Abcam,Mass.) were detected using BondTM Polymer Refine Red Kit (LeicaMicrosystems, Ill.). Tissue was counterstained with hematoxylin (LeicaMicrosystems, Ill.), dehydrated and mounted in xylene before microscopicevaluations. Slides containing sections of pancreas IHC stained foranti-glucagon (vector red) and anti-insulin (DAB) were imaged at low(4×) and high power (20×) using a Perkin Elmer Vectra automated imagingsystem equipped with a multispectral camera. Both low and high powerimages were analyzed using Perkin Elmer®'s InForm® image analysissoftware. Detailed analysis of individual islets was carried out usinghigh powered multispectral images. Images of each islet within apancreas section were acquired in an automated fashion and analyzed withPerkin Elmer®'s InForm® software following spectral unmixing. Algorithmswere created to quantify and characterize regions of alpha or beta cellsusing the anti-glucagon or anti-insulin staining respectively whileexcluding all irrelevant regions of the tissue. The number of nucleiwithin each region was also determined using the hematoxylin counterstain and used to calculate the average cell number and average cellsize relative to the region (alpha/beta) of each islet.

The study data are summarized in Table 9 below. Provided in the tableare: the number of alpha cells (quantified as % alpha cellnumber/islet+/−SEM), the overall area occupied by alpha cells(quantified as % alpha cell area/ islet+/−SEM), and average alpha cellsize (measured as pixels).

TABLE 9 % alpha cell % alpha cell Average alpha Treatment groupnumber/islet area/islet cell size (pixels) Vehicle 32.71 +/− 1.91 28.255+/− 1.75 522.51 +/− 20.59 mAb3, 3 mg/kg 47.785 +/− 2.23   45.57 +/− 2.43647.34 +/− 15.62 weekly Rapamycin, 35.37 +/− 2.85  31.72 +/− 2.64 539.13+/− 24.34 10 mg/kg daily + mAb3, 3 mg/kg weekly

Increased alpha cell number and alpha cell size were observed in themice treated with mAb3, compared to mice administered vehicle only(Table 9). These measures of increased alpha cell number and size wereabsent when mAb3 was co-administered with rapamycin treatment (Table 9).These data demonstrate that mTOR signaling may play a role in mediatingthe alpha cell hyperplasia. These data also demonstrate thatco-treatment with an mTOR inhibitor reduces hypertrophy and hyperplasiaelicited by blocking glucagon receptor activity.

Example 8 Liver Function Analysis

This example illustrates the effect of four-week treatment withanti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody on liver function.

It has been previously shown that 4-week treatment with a glucagonreceptor small molecule antagonist can lead to elevations in certainliver functions tests (LFT's), specifically alanine aminotransferase(ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (LY and MK). See, e.g.,Engel, S., et al., 2011, “Efficacy and tolerability of MK0893, aglucagon receptor antagonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes,” ADASymposium. To address whether such changes would be evident followinglong term treatment where the glucagon receptor was blocked with amonoclonal antibody rather than a small molecule, a study was conductedto evaluate the effects on these LFT parameters of weekly,intraperitoneal doses of anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody inwild-type and high fat diet-fed (HFD), DIO (diet-induced obese) mice,over 4 weeks.

In the study, wild-type and HFD-DIO mice were administered eitheranti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb3 or PBS vehicle (control)at a dose of 10 mg/kg i.p. on a weekly basis. The 10 mg/kg dose used hasbeen shown to exert maximal glucose lowering effect for a duration of atleast seven days (i.e., the dosing interval), suggesting that theglucagon receptor is fully blocked in this study. After 4 weeks of mAb3treatment, fasting serum samples were collected and levels of thefollowing liver enzymes were measured: ALT, AST, and ALP. The results(mean and standard error per group (n=10/group/mouse model)) aresummarized below in Table 10.

TABLE 10 ALT (U/L) ALP (U/L) PBS vehicle 10 mg/kg PBS vehicle 10 mg/kgMouse (control) mAb3 (control) mAb3 model Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEMMean SEM Wild-type 31.50 1.64 27.70 1.57 72.10 3.14 81.80 3.26 HFD-DIO223.00 67.85 191.90 24.91 61.30 3.29 56.20 2.40 AST (U/L) PBS vehicle 10mg/kg (control) mAb3 Mean SEM Mean SEM Wild-type 144.30 24.24 159.0021.32 HFD-DIO 226.20 51.57 128.70 9.59

There were no significant changes in any of the LFT parameters (i.e.,ALT, ALP and AST levels) measured in animals treated with mAb3 incomparison to the LFT parameters measured in the PBS vehicle controlanimals (Table 10).

These results demonstrate that four-week treatment with anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody is not deleterious to liver function.

Example 9 Liver Function Analysis

This example illustrates the effect of 43-week treatment withanti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody on liver function.

In this study, wild-type C57B1/6 male mice were exposed to long-termtreatment with anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb3, startingat 9 weeks of age and continuing for 43 weeks, until 52 weeks of age(n=9). A 3 mg/kg dose of mAb3 was administered i.p. weekly. PBS vehiclewas administered to a group of control animals (n=6). At termination ofthe study, fasting serum samples were collected and levels of thefollowing liver enzymes were measured: ALT, AST, and ALP. Results (meanand standard error per group) are summarized in Table 11.

TABLE 11 ALT (U/L) AST (U/L) ALP (U/L) PBS vehicle 3 mg/kg PBS vehicle 3mg/kg PBS vehicle (control) mAb3 (control) mAb3 (control) 3 mg/kg mAb3Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEM 43.50 9.52 49.786.30 61.00 10.07 54.33 5.80 63.17 3.25 63.67 2.66

There was no significant change in any of the the LFT parameters (i.e.,ALT, ALP and AST levels) measured in mice treated with mAb3 whencompared to LFT parameters measured in control mice dosed with PBS overthe same duration (Table 11). Thus, treatment with mAb3 glucagonreceptor blocking antibody, for a duration of approximately 11 months,which represents a significant portion of the total lifespan of thisanimal, was not associated with any deleterious effects on these enzymemarkers of liver function.

These results demonstrate that long-term treatment with anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody is not deleterious to liver function.

Example 10 Liver Function Analysis

This example illustrates the effect of chronic treatment withanti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody.

A study was conducted to address the effects of 13 week-long treatmentwith anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb5 on liver function.In the study, male and female cynomolgus monkeys were administered mAb5either subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV), over 13 weeks.

A single dose of 3 mg/kg mAb5 effectively inhibits glucose excursionafter glucagon challenge in cynomolgus monkeys (see, Example 3 above).Doses chosen for this chronic study were 10, 50 and 200 mg/kg, each ofwhich would be expected to produce full blockade of the glucagon signal.

Four cohorts of lean, naïve monkeys (each n=3 of each gender) received10 mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IV or SC injection for a total of 13 weeks. Afurther six cohorts of five lean, naïve monkeys of each gender, eachreceived 50 mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IV injection or 200 mg/kg mAb5 weeklyby IV or SC injection for a total of 13 weeks. As a control, five lean,naïve, monkeys of each gender received weekly injections of vehicle byeither the IV or SC injection routes for 13 weeks.

Fasting serum samples were collected from all animals on days 29, 57 and93, and compared to two baseline, pre-treatment samples taken from thesame animals before study-start (i.e., days—43 and—8). In addition toALT and AST, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma-glutamyltransferase(GGT) were also measured, using a clinical chemistry analyzer. The ALT,AST ALP and GGT test results (mean+/−SEM) are summarized below in Table12.

TABLE 12 Treatment Dose group duration ALT AST ALP GGT mAb5 (mg/kg)(days) (U/L) (U/L) (U/L) (U/L) Female −43 99.6 31.6 322.4 81.8 vehicle7.0 1.7 17.4 5.0 −8 53.0 28.2 296.6 79.2 3.6 2.0 23.7 2.8 29 70.8 33.2309.0 97.2 11.4 1.5 24.0 4.9 57 58.4 31.2 301.8 98.0 2.7 3.0 28.7 6.4 9360.8 39.4 309.8 94.2 4.3 1.7 26.3 6.1 Female −43 80.0 39.3 325.0 97.7 10mg/kg IV 19.2 1.9 19.7 6.2 −8 37.0 39.7 283.3 95.3 3.2 7.3 44.7 13.9 2962.7 37.0 271.0 98.0 20.2 1.7 53.1 9.8 57 43.3 36.3 299.3 116.7 14.2 1.237.9 12.6 93 53.7 46.0 285.0 102.3 24.8 2.0 45.2 10.9 Female −43 84.741.0 287.0 65.3 10 mg/kg SC 19.4 6.5 42.2 0.7 −8 74.3 38.7 259.7 68.012.3 2.3 35.3 4.4 29 87.7 50.7 270.7 72.0 17.3 6.1 22.6 1.5 57 60.3 48.3248.0 71.7 5.7 4.6 23.8 1.5 93 62.3 53.0 236.0 68.3 12.4 8.5 24.1 1.2Female −43 134.2 41.6 328.2 83.0 50 mg/kg IV 29.2 4.0 16.7 6.5 −8 78.039.8 265.0 78.2 26.8 5.3 8.3 4.2 29 73.8 39.2 240.8 77.4 17.4 5.7 19.14.2 57 58.6 34.8 239.2 88.2 5.9 2.1 14.1 6.4 93 73.2 50.8 260.4 82.8 8.810.1 33.4 7.8 Female −43 99.4 36.8 353.2 93.0 200 mg/kg IV 9.4 1.9 66.111.5 −8 77.6 31.4 328.0 86.8 23.9 2.2 68.0 13.6 29 65.0 35.6 274.6 89.24.3 5.8 31.5 10.3 57 68.4 31.8 298.6 97.0 7.2 2.9 46.9 10.0 93 87.8 46.6263.2 85.0 9.8 6.2 38.1 7.4 Female −43 102.4 39.2 314.6 83.0 200 mg/kgSC 22.7 5.9 15.9 7.6 −8 72.4 38.2 274.4 81.8 20.3 5.4 20.7 6.4 29 65.039.0 271.2 79.6 18.5 4.1 40.2 8.4 57 57.2 32.2 255.8 88.2 16.0 3.5 28.86.6 93 71.6 44.8 285.6 87.2 16.8 6.4 42.1 8.6 Male −43 67.0 45.8 729.2160.2 vehicle 12.4 4.1 50.9 15.7 −8 32.2 37.6 684.4 165.6 2.8 3.3 65.414.8 29 44.8 42.4 743.6 212.4 4.2 3.3 47.8 31.1 57 38.0 40.6 788.6 214.64.4 4.5 77.3 18.5 93 56.8 53.2 768.6 187.6 7.3 4.0 36.0 14.6 Male −4392.0 51.0 618.0 130.7 10 mg/kg IV 53.1 13.7 23.6 9.9 −8 48.0 42.7 638.0155.0 22.0 8.8 15.3 15.4 29 74.7 45.3 638.0 149.3 43.2 13.0 31.7 5.2 5749.7 35.7 676.7 170.0 17.6 5.2 106.0 5.0 93 51.3 49.0 678.7 150.0 16.44.6 106.1 3.0 Male −43 72.0 51.7 584.0 125.3 10 mg/kg SC 12.8 9.2 109.612.2 −8 34.7 34.0 556.7 135.0 6.7 2.6 86.5 13.7 29 51.7 41.7 595.3 130.33.5 3.0 118.4 12.3 57 40.7 38.0 571.7 152.7 5.4 4.6 96.1 13.9 93 64.364.7 574.3 141.0 15.9 19.2 106.8 17.5 Male −43 67.4 45.6 730.0 173.2 50mg/kg SC 12.1 3.4 87.3 9.5 −8 40.6 39.4 782.4 190.8 4.5 1.7 88.0 14.3 2946.0 39.6 696.4 178.4 9.2 1.9 94.5 18.4 57 39.8 36.0 712.6 186.8 7.8 2.0101.7 21.9 93 44.8 46.8 611.4 161.3 15.2 13.7 172.5 17.1 Male −43 59.840.6 511.8 134.2 200 mg/kg IV 17.0 5.7 37.5 11.8 −8 36.2 38.2 566.4168.8 6.5 5.5 39.8 18.3 29 51.8 36.4 504.0 147.2 17.0 3.8 30.2 16.4 5743.0 35.2 537.0 158.2 6.4 3.1 46.2 17.7 93 49.4 44.8 526.2 142.4 7.4 7.254.2 16.8 Male −43 48.2 37.8 584.2 158.2 200 mg/kg SC 6.1 3.6 43.4 16.5−8 36.8 31.0 605.2 184.2 4.7 0.8 24.7 22.1 29 44.8 33.6 521.2 155.0 5.93.5 40.5 17.3 57 44.8 36.0 600.6 190.2 5.6 2.3 57.6 16.1 93 57.6 42.6576.4 175.0 8.0 4.5 43.1 13.8

Table 12 shows the mean (+/−SEM) values for ALT, AST ALP and GGT levelsat baseline (days—43 and—8) and at monthly intervals throughout thedosing schedule (days 29, 57 and 93). There were no significant changesin any of the LFT parameters measured in animals treated with mAb5 atany dose level/ dose route, compared to vehicle-treated control animalsand each group's own baseline values (Table 12).

These results demonstrate that chronic treatment with high dose mAb5glucagon receptor blocking antibody is not deleterious to liverfunction.

Example 11 Circulating Lipid Level Analysis

This example illustrates the effect of chronic, long term treatment withmAb5 glucagon receptor antagonist antibody.

To evaluate the effects of blocking the glucagon receptor with amonoclonal antibody, male and female cynomolgus monkeys wereadministered weekly doses of mAb5, for 13 weeks and assessed for effectson circulating lipids (total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C andtriglycerides).

Four cohorts of lean, naïve monkeys, each comprising three animals ofeach gender received 10 mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IV or SC injection for atotal of 13 weeks. A further six cohorts of five lean, naïve monkeys ofeach gender, each received 50 mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IV injection or 200mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IV or SC injection for a total of 13 weeks. As acontrol, five lean, naïve, monkeys of each gender received weeklyinjections of vehicle (by both the IV and SC routes) for 13 weeks.

Fasting serum samples were collected (approximately monthly) from allanimals on days 29, 57 and 93, and compared against two baseline,pre-treatment samples taken from the same animals before study-start(days -43 and -8). In addition to ALT and AST, alkaline phosphatase(ALP) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) were also measured, using aclinical chemistry analyzer. The data from this study (mean+/−SEM) aresummarized in Table 13.

TABLE 13 Treatment Total Dose group duration cholesterol LDL-C HDL-C TGmAb5 (mg/kg) (days) (mg/dL) (mg/dL) (mg/dL) (mg/dL) Female −43 100.056.4 54.4 46.0 vehicle 7.2 4.2 5.4 6.2 −8 98.8 47.0 56.4 50.2 8.6 4.74.6 9.8 29 105.8 45.6 56.0 50.6 7.4 3.3 3.6 6.2 57 114.0 46.2 63.8 46.29.6 4.9 5.1 6.8 93 111.0 46.0 57.8 43.0 7.7 3.6 4.9 6.0 Female 10 −43122.7 77.7 58.3 71.0 mg/kg IV 9.6 5.2 5.8 5.1 −8 122.3 64.7 64.0 73.03.9 4.1 2.9 7.0 29 133.7 71.7 60.7 68.7 11.8 3.8 5.6 10.7 57 142.7 69.768.0 64.0 11.6 3.2 7.2 9.2 93 153.7 79.7 55.7 77.7 8.5 2.9 2.2 6.8Female −43 82.3 41.3 50.7 41.3 10 mg/kg SC 4.2 1.7 3.8 1.8 −8 86.3 38.751.7 40.0 4.8 1.9 4.2 8.2 29 106.0 46.7 56.7 54.3 3.2 0.9 5.8 3.0 57104.3 43.7 57.3 47.0 4.2 2.0 3.4 3.2 93 97.0 44.7 51.0 37.7 6.1 1.8 4.22.2 Female −43 108.8 64.8 56.6 51.8 50 mg/kg IV 7.7 6.7 6.8 5.3 −8 111.854.6 63.2 52.4 5.4 6.3 4.5 3.9 29 115.0 54.4 61.8 43.8 7.9 6.2 5.1 1.457 127.2 61.2 62.8 46.4 9.5 9.1 5.2 4.4 93 113.2 49.2 45.0 69.8 7.4 6.710.1 26.2 Female −43 97.2 55.8 63.4 50.0 200 mg/kg IV 5.5 6.5 7.5 4.4 −899.4 54.2 55.2 48.6 10.7 8.0 3.1 5.9 29 110.8 52.0 59.6 55.2 4.7 2.6 4.79.0 57 119.8 54.4 62.0 65.8 7.2 5.8 7.3 2.2 93 111.4 50.2 51.4 51.8 8.37.3 3.2 5.2 Female −43 116.0 78.6 52.6 48.8 200 mg/kg SC 6.6 7.1 3.110.0 −8 116.0 62.0 62.0 52.0 5.1 4.7 2.6 7.3 29 121.2 65.8 52.4 45.4 7.411.4 6.5 2.0 57 134.4 62.4 65.4 50.4 9.1 6.2 6.9 10.3 93 119.6 52.2 55.645.8 4.0 4.7 4.0 6.1 Male −43 112.6 55.0 70.4 38.0 vehicle 4.9 4.0 2.24.8 −8 105.4 45.0 70.0 45.0 3.7 1.0 3.8 7.8 29 122.2 47.2 76.8 47.6 6.33.6 5.7 2.8 57 120.6 42.2 75.8 36.6 6.1 2.0 5.4 4.0 93 126.8 41.8 69.639.2 7.3 1.2 4.0 4.5 Male −43 113.3 64.0 62.3 41.0 10 mg/kg IV 6.4 4.04.3 3.2 −8 117.0 56.7 66.3 56.7 5.3 3.0 3.2 18.0 29 129.0 60.0 62.0 54.313.9 6.8 3.2 10.9 57 123.3 51.3 70.3 47.0 10.4 3.4 7.0 8.9 93 111.0 40.058.7 36.0 13.5 5.5 11.6 6.6 Male 43 107.3 54.0 67.3 42.0 10 mg/kg SC12.8 11.1 7.9 3.0 −8 100.3 45.0 64.3 48.7 14.7 10.7 8.5 9.0 29 119.350.3 70.7 43.3 16.1 11.4 9.7 2.3 57 110.3 37.3 71.3 55.3 8.4 5.4 3.4 2.693 107.7 36.0 67.7 37.7 7.4 6.7 4.4 5.5 Male −43 114.8 68.2 62.2 35.0 50mg/kg IV 7.9 8.6 5.5 3.5 −8 111.2 56.2 66.2 38.4 5.5 5.8 6.4 2.5 29118.6 56.0 57.0 41.6 11.8 9.5 7.2 2.6 57 114.2 48.2 62.0 41.0 8.7 6.65.0 4.9 93 80.4 35.6 38.2 28.0 22.7 11.1 12.6 7.1 Male −43 112.4 64.664.2 35.8 200 mg/kg IV 9.3 6.3 6.1 3.5 −8 113.6 58.8 66.2 34.4 8.6 5.93.7 2.9 29 130.8 62.0 70.8 37.2 10.5 6.0 7.9 7.7 57 121.4 52.6 66.8 56.47.1 3.2 4.0 18.2 93 109.0 51.8 56.8 45.2 9.9 5.0 4.8 12.5 Male −43 107.257.0 63.8 48.2 200 mg/kg SC 6.5 5.2 2.7 6.0 −8 107.6 47.8 68.4 51.0 10.46.5 7.1 6.3 29 111.2 50.6 62.4 43.8 10.2 7.8 5.8 5.2 57 119.4 49.0 63.855.8 7.8 5.1 3.8 18.2 93 110.6 44.0 59.2 38.8 6.0 3.5 4.6 2.2

Table 13 shows the mean (+/-SEM) values for these parameters at baseline(days -43 and -8) and at monthly intervals throughout the dosingschedule (days 29, 57 and 93). There were no significant changes in anyof the circulating lipid parameters measured in animals treated withmAb5 at any dose level/ dose route, compared to the vehicle-treatedcontrol animals and each group's own baseline values (Table 13).

These results demonstrate that chronic treatment with high dose mAb5glucagon receptor blocking antibody does not result in deleteriouselevations in LDL-C or triglycerides.

Example 12 Reversal of Alpha Cell Hyperplasia

This example illustrates the reversal of pancreatic alpha cellhyperplasia with or without hypertrophy in subjects treated with highdoses of anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody.

It has been shown that blockade of glucagon signaling in mice and /orrats leads to a compensatory elevation in circulating glucagon levels(hyperglucagonemia) and an increase in pancreatic alpha cell number and/or cell size (see, e.g., Gelling et al., 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 100(3):1438-1443 (GCGR null mice); Sloop et al., 2004, J. Clin.Invest. 113(11): 1571-1581 (antisense oligonucleotides); Gu et al.,2009, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 331(3): 871-881 (monoclonal antibody)).As shown above in Example 3, a single dose of 3 mg/kg mAb5 effectivelyinhibits glucose excursion after glucagon challenge in cynomolgusmonkeys, hence the doses chosen for this chronic study (10, 50 and 200mg/kg) would be expected to produce full blockade of the glucagonsignal.

In this study, four cohorts of lean, naïve monkeys, each comprisingthree animals of each gender received 10 mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IV or SCinjection for a total of 13 weeks. A further six cohorts of five lean,naïve monkeys of each gender, each received 50 mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IVinjection or 200 mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IV or SC injection for a total of13 weeks. As a control, five lean, naive, monkeys of each genderreceived weekly injections of vehicle (by both the IV and SC routes) for13 weeks.

At the end of the dosing period, the pancreata from three animals percohort were collected, sectioned and stained using standard H&E, andanti-glucagon/ anti-insulin

IHC techniques. The pancreata were examined and scored for islet alphacell hyperplasia and hypertrophy. Two animals of each gender fromselected cohorts (control; 50 mg/kg IV; 200 mg/kg IV; 200 mg/kg SC) werethen followed for a recovery period (i.e., after discontinuation of mAb5dosing) of 24 weeks, to allow antibody levels to fall below efficaciousthresholds (“antibody washout”). At the end of this antibody washoutperiod, the pancreata from these animals were similarly analyzed forhyperplasia and hypertrophy. The data from this study are summarized inTable 14.

TABLE 14 Number of animals Number of animals scoring scoring positivepositive after 24 wks after 13 wks treatment recovery 10 10 50 200 200200 200 Control IV SC IV IV SC Control 50 IV IV SC Males Hyperplasia 0 11 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 Hyper- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 trophy Females Hyperplasia 01 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 Hyper- 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 trophy

There is evidence of alpha cell hyperplasia and/or hypertrophy in someanimals at the 13 week time-point (Table 13, first eight columns).However, neither alpha cell hyperplasia nor hypertrophy was evident inany animal, from any dose group, at the end of the 24 week antibodywashout period (Table 13, last four columns). Thus, although chronic,long term treatment with mAb5 at high doses may result in pancreaticalpha cell hyperplasia with or without hypertrophy, these features arefully reversible following antibody washout.

These results demonstrate that changes in the alpha cells of thepancreatic islets after mAb5 treatment in cynomolgus monkeys are fullyreversible once levels of therapeutic antibody fall below a minimallyefficacious threshold and the blockade of glucagon signaling isrelieved.

Example 13 Reversal of Hepatocyte Glycogen Deposition

This example illustrates reversal of hepatocyte glycogen deposition insubjects treated with high doses of anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody.

A single dose of 3 mg/kg mAb5 effectively inhibits glucose excursionafter glucagon challenge in cynomolgus monkeys (see, Example 3,supra).The doses chosen for this chronic study (10, 50 and 200 mg/kg)would be expected to produce full blockade of the glucagon signal. Fourcohorts of lean, naïve monkeys, each comprising three animals of eachgender received 10 mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IV or SC injection for a totalof 13 weeks. A further six cohorts of five lean, naïve monkeys of eachgender, each received 50 mg/kg mAb5 weekly by IV injection or 200 mg/kgmAb5 weekly by IV or SC injection for a total of 13 weeks. As a control,five lean, naïve, monkeys of each gender received weekly injections ofvehicle (by both the IV and SC routes) for 13 weeks.

At the end of the dosing period, the livers from three animals percohort were collected, fixed, sectioned and stained using standard H&Eand PAS staining techniques. The livers were examined and scored forincreased hepatocellular glycogen deposition. Two animals of each genderfrom selected cohorts (control; 50 mg/kg IV; 200 mg/kg IV; 200 mg/kg SC)were then followed for a 24-week recovery period after discontinuationof mAb5 dosing to allow antibody levels to fall below efficaciousthresholds (“antibody washout”). At the end of this period, the liversfrom these animals were similarly analyzed. The data from this study aresummarized in Table 15.

TABLE 15 Increased hepatocellular glycogen # animals scoring # animalsscoring positive after positive after 13 wks mAb5 treatment 24 wksrecovery Con- 10 50 200 200 Con- 50 200 200 Cohort trol 10 IV SC IV IVSC trol IV IV SC Males 0 0 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 Females 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0

Increased hepatocellular glycogen was observed in some animals after 13weeks mAb5 treatment (Table 15). For example, 2 males dosed with 10mg/kg SC mAb5, 1 female dosed with 50 mg/kg IV mAb5, 3 males and 2females dosed with 200 mg/kg IV mAb, and 2 males dosed with 200 mg/kg SCmAb5 scored positive for increased hepatocellular glycogen (Table 15,first seven columns). However, no evidence of increased hepatocellularglycogen was observed in any animal, from any dose group, after the mAb5washout time (Table 15, last four columns). Thus, although chronic, longterm treatment with mAb5 at high doses may result in changes inhepatocellular glycogen deposition, the changes are fully reversiblefollowing antibody washout.

These results demonstrate that changes in glycogen accumulation inhepatocytes after anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody treatmentin cynomolgus monkeys are fully reversible once levels of therapeuticantibody fall below a minimally efficacious threshold and the blockadeof glucagon signaling is relieved.

Example 14 In Vivo Efficacy in a Mouse Model of Type 2 Diabetes

This example illustrates treatment with an anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes.

Leptin-deficient male ob/ob mice demonstrate marked hyperphagiaresulting in hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and obesity. In this study,male ob/ob mice were administered a single dose of mAb3 at the followingdoses: 10 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg or 0.3 mg/kg (n=5 for each dosegroup). Control animals were administered PBS instead of mAb3. Bloodsamples were taken from all animals (in the fed state) at the followingtime-points: pre-dose, and on days 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, and 20post-dose. Whole blood samples were analyzed for glucose concentrationsusing a hand-held One Touch® glucometer. Mean absolute glucosevalues+/−SEM are shown in Table 16.

TABLE 16 Mean fed blood glucose levels (mg/dL) Day 10 mg/kg 0.3 mg/kgpost- PBS mAb3 3 mg/kg mAb3 1 mg/kg mAb3 mAb3 dose Mean SEM Mean SEMMean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEM 0 283.60 13.04 291.00 18.12 289.00 21.85292.00 34.09 316.00 29.68 (pre- dose) 1 259.80 32.54 111.20 13.50 101.606.76 128.60 8.26 254.60 26.62 2 261.80 28.13 81.80 3.64 79.20 3.62124.00 8.79 243.80 51.43 5 236.60 15.36 80.60 7.45 95.20 6.95 252.4041.83 240.40 18.28 6 241.20 43.40 75.60 7.71 136.60 15.50 295.80 47.64207.60 21.09 7 186.20 19.53 86.60 6.39 197.20 15.55 226.80 30.26 235.4019.18 9 220.80 22.73 97.60 8.85 306.00 48.24 195.60 13.92 229.40 15.2512  187.20 18.74 151.40 16.81 314.20 45.06 275.00 26.34 220.80 23.90 13 237.00 41.55 164.60 24.08 254.00 31.44 212.20 34.32 214.40 23.26 20 191.80 32.66 210.20 21.57 201.40 11.54 231.60 32.00 245.60 22.34

As shown in Table 16, administration of a single intra-peritonealinjection of anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb3 produces amarked and sustained reduction in the fed blood glucose levels of thesemice compared to their pre-treatment baselines or to a vehicle-treatedgroup. The duration of effect showed a dose response, with the 10 mg/kgdose having the longest duration of effect, and the 1 mg/kg dose havingthe shortest duration of effect (Table 16). Animals treated withanti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb3 at 10, 3, or 1 mg/kg hadsignificantly improved fed glucose levels one and two days post mAb3dosing (Table 16, rows 2 and 3).

A single dose of 10 or 3 mg/kg mAb3 produced comparable maximal effectsin glucose lowering. For example, at 6 days after treatment with 10mg/kg mAb3, mice had a fed blood glucose level of 75.60±7.71 mg/dL, andat 2 days after treatment with 3 mg/kg mAb3, mice had a fed bloodglucose level of 79.20±3.62 mg/dL. In comparison, control animals givenPBS instead of mAb3 had much higher fed blood glucose levels:261.80±28.13 mg/dL at day 2 after dosing, and 241.20±43.40 mg/dL at day6 after dosing. A dose of 1 mg/kg produced a lesser effect: at 2 daysafter treatment with 1 mg/kg mAb3, mice had a fed blood glucose level of124.00±8.79 mg/dL. No measureable effect was observed with the 0.3 mg/kgdose.

By day 5, glucose levels in animals treated with 1 mg/kg mAb3 hadreturned to pre-dose levels. However, animals treated with either 3 or10 mg/kg mAb3 retained improved fed glucose levels until days 7 and 12post-dose, respectively (Table 16, rows 4, 6 and 8).

These results demonstrate that anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody mAb3 effectively reduces fed blood glucose levels in a mousemodel of type 2 diabetes.

Example 15 In Vivo Efficacy in a Mouse Model of Type 2 Diabetes

This example illustrates treatment with an anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody in mouse models of type 2 diabetes.

HFD-DIO and ob/ob mice are accepted models of some, if not all elementsof type 2 diabetes. Both these models manifest overt obesity.Three-month old male mice of both model types were administered eitheranti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb3 or PBS (n=10/ group/mouse model). mAb3 was administered at 10 mg/kg by weeklyintraperitoneal injection over 4 weeks; PBS was administered in asimilar manner to control animals. The body weight of each mouse wasmeasured at the end of 1, 2 and 3 weeks of treatment. At each timepoint, each individual mouse's weight was expressed as a percentage ofits pre-dose start weight. Average weight±SEM for each group determined.The results are summarized in Table 17.

TABLE 17 Mean body weight (% compared to baseline) Mouse Model by theend of: and Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Treatment Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEMHFD-DIO PBS 106.47 0.74 110.57 0.88 119.42 1.41 mAb3 103.04 0.66 106.610.68 114.99 1.23 ob/ob PBS 104.30 0.32 108.23 0.46 110.67 0.47 mAb3102.87 0.23 105.88 0.89 108.20 1.18

Both HFD-DIO and ob/ob mice treated with anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody mAb3 at 10 mg/kg had significantly less body weightgain over the four week duration of the study compared to the micetreated with PBS (Table 17). For example, in the HFD-DIO mice, animalstreated with mAb3 had a mean body weight of 114.99±1.23% of baseline,compared to animals given PBS, who had a mean body weight of119.42±1.41% of baseline. In summary, treatment with mAb3 significantlyreduced weight gain in both HFD-DIO mice and ob/ob mice compared toPBS-treated mice.

These results demonstrate that anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody can reduce weight gain in two different mouse models of type 2diabetes.

Example 16 Combination Treatment

This example illustrates combination treatment with an anti-glucagonreceptor antagonist antibody and an mTOR inhibitor in mice.

Blocking glucagon signaling in rodents has been previously demonstratedto cause a resultant increase in the number and/or size of pancreaticalpha (i.e., glucagon-producing) cells. See, e.g., Gelling et al., 2003,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(3):1438-1443 (GCGR null mice); Sloop etal., 2004, J. Clin. Invest. 113(11): 1571-1581 (antisenseoligonucleotides); Gu et al., 2009, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 331(3):871-881 (monoclonal antibody). Administration of anti-glucagon receptorantagonist antibody mAb3 (once weekly i.p.) in mice has similarly beenshown to increase the number and total area of alpha cells per islet,reflecting an increase in alpha cell number as well as an increase inaverage alpha cell size.

In this study, male, HFD-DIO mice at 12 weeks of age (n=5 per group)received either once weekly, intra-peritoneal injection of 3 mg/kg mAb3,or daily, intra-peritoneal dosing of 10 mg/kg rapamycin (formulated in5% ethanol, 5.2% Tween-80, 5.2% PEG 400 in water), in combination with aonce weekly 3 mg/kg dose of anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodymAb3. A third group received PBS as a control.

After three weeks of treatment, the animals were sacrificed and theirpancreata collected, fixed, sectioned, and stained for glucagon (toidentify islet alpha cells) and insulin (to identify islet beta cells),as previously described. Algorithms were created to quantify andcharacterize regions of alpha or beta cells using the anti-glucagon oranti-insulin staining respectively while excluding all irrelevantregions of the tissue. The number of nuclei within each region was alsodetermined using the hematoxylin counter stain and used to calculate theaverage cell number and average cell size relative to the region(alpha/beta) of each islet.

The study data are summarized in Table 18 below. Table 18 provides (a)the number of alpha cells, quantified as % alpha cellnumber/islet+/−SEM, (b) the overall area occupied by alpha cells,quantified as % alpha cell area/ islet+/−SEM, and (c) average alpha cellsize, measured as pixels.

TABLE 18 % alpha cell % alpha cell Average alpha Treatment groupnumber/islet area/islet cell size (pixels) PBS  5.84 +/− 0.80  4.58 +/−0.63 416.2 +/− 14.03 mAb3, 3 mg/kg weekly 21.09 +/− 2.08 18.04 +/− 1.90521.1 +/− 6.69  Rapamycin, 10 mg/kg  7.13 +/− 3.61  6.63 +/− 3.26 491.0+/− 71.51 daily + mAb3, 3 mg/kg weekly

Increased alpha cell number (alpha cell hyperplasia) and alpha cell size(alpha cell hypertrophy) were observed in HFD-DIO mice treated withmAb3, compared to mice administered vehicle only (Table 18). However,these measures of increased alpha cell number and size were absent inHFD-DIO mice when mAb3 was co-administered with rapamycin treatment(Table 18, last row).

These data demonstrate that mTOR signaling may play a role in mediatingthe alpha cell hyperplasia. These data also demonstrate thatco-treatment with an mTOR inhibitor reduces hypertrophy and hyperplasiaelicited by blocking glucagon receptor activity.

Example 17 In Vivo Efficacy in Cynomolgus Monkey

This Example illustrates the effect of anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody on plasma glucose levels after glucagon challenge in cynomolgusmonkeys.

Administration of an intravenous bolus of glucagon to animals leads toan elevation in plasma glucose as a result of glucagon signaling at theliver (glucagon challenge). To determine the doses of mAb5 effective inblocking acute glucagon signaling in vivo, the glucagon challengeparadigm was conducted in lean, naïve, female, cynomolgus monkeys givenanti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb5 at 1, 3, or 30 mg/kg anhour prior to the glucagon challenge being performed. For each cohort ofanimals, the glucagon challenge was performed on two separate occasions:a first challenge five days before the monkeys received mAb5 toestablish a pre-dose baseline for each animal to which the post-doseresponse was compared, and a second challenge one hour after the monkeysreceived the mAb5 dose.

For each glucagon challenge, an IV bolus of 20 μg/kg glucagon (GlucaGen®Hypokits®) was administered at time 0. Blood samples were taken from allanimals at the following time-points: immediately pre-challenge, and at5, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 minutes post-challenge. Plasma samples wereanalyzed for plasma glucose concentrations using a clinical chemistryanalyzer. The results (mean change in glucose levels+/−SEM in mg/dL) aresummarized in Table 19. Due to inter-animal variability in theirstarting blood glucose levels, data are shown as change in absoluteglucose value from the pre-challenge value.

TABLE 19 Mean change in absolute glucose value from pre-challenge value(mg/dL) Treatment Time (mins) relative to glucagon administration Group5 15 30 45 60 120 mAb5 30 mg/kg Glucagon 41.33 ± 9.82  45.67 ± 6.84 26.33 ± 6.69  12.67 ± 6.06 14.67 ± 7.31 −15.00 ± 7.09  (n = 3) challenge(GC) at baseline GC 1 hr −15.00 ± 16.74  −16.67 ± 14.17  −20.67 ± 16.90−15.67 ± 7.22 −26.00 ± 12.90 −33.67 ± 14.99 post- mAb5 mAb5 3 mg/kg GCat 37.00 ± 17.23 56.75 ± 26.52  38.75 ± 34.36  21.00 ± 35.53  16.25 ±28.04 −23.50 ± 4.35  (n = 4) baseline GC 1 hr 13.25 ± 11.43 16.25 ±22.45  6.75 ± 25.85   8.75 ± 24.34  1.50 ± 25.69 −24.50 ± 6.33  post-mAb5 mAb5 1 mg/kg GC at 51.67 ± 13.69 52.00 ± 14.19  25.00 ± 17.35 15.33 ± 23.62  14.00 ± 19.14  −6.33 ± 2.19  (n = 3) baseline GC 1 hr 3.00 ± 11.59  1.00 ± 14.73 −14.33 ± 10.99 −23.00 ± 6.66 −18.00 ± 7.81 −32.00 ± 8.08  post- mAb5

In each group, on Day—5, the glucagon challenge without prior mAb5treatment resulted in an increase in plasma glucose levels, reflectingthe physiological response of the liver increasing glucose productionand output as a result of glucagon stimulation (baseline) (Table 19,rows labeled “GC at baseline”). Glucose levels peaked 15 minutes afterthe glucagon challenge and generally returned to pre-challenge, or evenlower levels between 60-120 minutes post challenge

Treatment with mAb5 one hour prior to a glucagon challenge resulted in amarked inhibition of the glucose response to glucagon challenge relativeto the baseline response (Table 19, rows labeled “GC 1 hr post-mAb5”).Peak glucose excursions in these groups were minimal and in some casesnegative, generally observed at earlier time points, and returned morequickly to normal or indeed lower than pre-challenge levels. Forexample, at 15 minutes post-GC (the time at which glucose levels peakedduring the baseline challenge) the blood glucose level of animalstreated with 30 mg/kg mAb5 was 16.67±14.17 mg/dL lower than atpre-challenge. However, at 15 minutes post-GC without mAb5 treatment,the blood glucose levels of these same animals was 45.67±6.84 mg/dLhigher than at pre-challenge. At 15 minutes post-GC, the blood glucoselevel of animals treated with 3 mg/kg mAb5 was 16.25±22.45 mg/dL higherthan at pre-challenge. In contrast, at 15 minutes post-GC without mAb5treatment, the blood glucose levels of these same animals was56.75±26.52 mg/dL higher than at pre-challenge. At 15 minutes post-GC,the blood glucose level of animals treated with 1 mg/kg mAb5 was1.00±14.73 mg/dL higher than at pre-challenge. In contrast, at 15minutes post-GC without mAb5 treatment, the blood glucose levels ofthese same animals was 52.00±14.19 mg/dL higher than at pre-challenge.Doses of 30, 3 or 1 mg/kg mAb5 showed similar efficacy in this paradigmwith no dose response.

These results demonstrate that mAb5 is efficacious at blocking glucagonsignaling in vivo, and anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibodyeffectively blocks glucose excursion after glucagon challenge.

Example 18 In Vivo Efficacy in Cynomolgus Monkey

This Example illustrates the effect of anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody on plasma glucose levels after glucagon challenge in cynomolgusmonkeys.

Administration of an intravenous bolus of glucagon to animals leads toan elevation in plasma glucose as a result of glucagon signaling at theliver (glucagon challenge). To determine other doses of mAb5 which maybe effective in blocking acute glucagon signaling in vivo, the glucagonchallenge paradigm was conducted in lean, naïve, female, cynomolgusmonkeys given anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb5 at 1.78,0.24 or 0.026 mg/kg an hour prior to the glucagon challenge beingperformed. An additional cohort of animals received PBS vehicle only(n=4/ group). For each cohort of animals, the glucagon challenge wasperformed on three separate occasions: a first challenge at three daysbefore the monkeys received mAb5 to establish a pre-dose baseline foreach animal and ensure all animals are glucagon-responsive; a secondchallenge one hour after the monkeys received the mAb5 dose; and thirdchallenge one week after the monkeys received the mAb5 dose.

For each glucagon challenge, an IV bolus of 20 μg/kg glucagon (GlucaGen®Hypokits®) was administered at time 0. Blood samples were taken from allanimals at the following time-points: pre-challenge, and at 5, 15, 30,45, 60 and 120 minutes post-challenge. Plasma samples were analyzed forplasma glucose concentrations using a clinical chemistry analyzer. Theresults (mean change in glucose levels+/−SEM in mg/dL) from the secondand third challenges are summarized in Table 20. Due to inter-animalvariability in their starting blood glucose levels, data are shown aschange in absolute glucose value from the pre-challenge value taken onthat day.

TABLE 20 Mean change in absolute glucose value from pre-challenge value(mg/dL) Treatment Time (mins) relative to glucagon administration Group5 15 30 45 60 120 Glucagon PBS 28.00 ± 3.00 34.75 ± 5.57 −2.50 ± 7.12−10.75 ± 7.63 −11.25 ± 11.66 −29.50 ± 7.08 challenge (control, 1 hourpost no mAb) mAb5 1.78 mg/kg 22.25 ± 1.49  5.75 ± 5.63 −14.25 ± 7.91 −11.75 ± 5.15 −2.75 ± 3.75  −7.00 ± 3.24 mAb5 0.24 mg/kg 44.25 ± 6.2127.50 ± 4.63  6.00 ± 5.24  −1.25 ± 7.59 −5.75 ± 7.59 −10.25 ± 3.90 mAb50.026 mg/kg 30.25 ± 6.65 20.75 ± 8.73  0.25 ± 1.65  −9.25 ± 5.28 −3.25 ±2.84 −15.50 ± 2.72 mAb5 Glucagon PBS 22.50 ± 8.03  18.50 ± 10.12 −7.00 ±7.45 −11.00 ± 9.17 −14.25 ± 11.15 −34.25 ± 5.91 challenge (control, 7days post no mAb) mAb5 1.78 mg/kg 19.00 ± 7.52  8.50 ± 7.19 −9.25 ± 6.29 −4.00 ± 7.72 −11.50 ± 3.40  −24.50 ± 4.94 mAb5 0.24 mg/kg  34.75 ±14.46  30.50 ± 12.26  0.25 ± 14.56  −6.75 ± 11.71  −5.75 ± 17.38  −22.00± 11.50 mAb5 0.026 mg/kg 28.50 ± 2.53 21.25 ± 7.72 −9.00 ± 3.83 −13.00 ±4.80 −21.00 ± 5.90  −29.75 ± 7.50 mAb5

Post-glucagon challenge (GC) changes in blood glucose levels in animalstreated with mAb5 can be compared to changes in blood glucose levels inanimals pre-treated with PBS receiving GC on the same day (Table 20).Peak glucose levels were generally observed at the 5 minute time point.During GC one hour post mAb5 dose at 0.026 and 0.24 mg/kg, only veryslight if any reductions in glucose response were seen. For example, inanimals challenged 1 hour after treatment with 0.026 and 0.24 mg/kgmAb5, increases in blood glucose levels of 30.25±6.65 mg/dL and44.25±6.21 mg/dL, respectively, were observed at peak glucose level,compared to an increase of 34.75±5.57 mg/dL in animals given PBS insteadof mAb5 (Table 20). By Day 8, the response in the 0.026 and 0.24 mg/kgmAb5 dosing groups was similar to control animals.

However, in the 1.78 mg/kg mAb5 treatment group, moderate inhibition ofthe glucagon response at one hour post dose was observed. In animalstreated with 1.78 mg/kg mAb5, plasma glucose levels were lower than inother groups, peaking at 5 minutes (22.25±1.49 mg/dL), and wererecovered to baseline or below by 30-45 minutes post challenge (Table20). This inhibition of the glucagon response was observed even when arepeat glucagon challenge was conducted seven days post administrationof mAb5 (Table 20). A significant treatment effect of 1.78 mg/kg mAb5was also evident in reducing pre-challenge (i.e. fasting) plasma glucoselevels relative (60.0±3.79 mg/dL) to plasma glucose levels in thevehicle treated group (85.50±8.17 mg/dL).

These results demonstrate that anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody effectively blocks glucose excursion after glucagon challenge.

Example 19 Epitope Mapping

The crystal structure of anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody mAb5and the crystal structure of the mAb5:glucagon receptor complex wereused to characterize the epitope on human glucagon receptor recognizedby mAb5. The glucagon receptor residues involved in binding wereidentified by calculating the difference in accessibility surface areabetween the mAb5:glucagon receptor crystal structure and the glucagonreceptor structure alone. Glucagon receptor residues that show buriedsurface area upon complex formation with mAb5 antibody were included aspart of the epitope. The solvent accessible surface of a protein wasdefined as the locus of the centre of a probe sphere (representing asolvent molecule of 1.4 A radius) as it rolls over the Van der Waalssurface of the protein. The solvent accessible surface area wascalculated by generating surface points on an extended sphere aroundeach atom (at a distance from the atom centre equal to the sum of theatom and probe radii), and eliminating those that lie within equivalentspheres associated with neighboring atoms as implemented in the programMODELLER (A. Sali & T. L. Blundell. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815, 1993).Based on the crystal structure analysis, the structural epitope onglucagon receptor recognized by mAb5 involves the amino acid residues atpositions 31, 33-38, 40-42, 44-45, 48, 62, and 64 of human glucagonreceptor (SEQ ID NO: 1).

The identity of the residues that dominate the binding energy of a largeprotein-protein interface has been termed the “functional epitope”(Cunningham, B. C. and Wells, J. A., 1993, J. Mol. Biol., 234, 554-563).The affinity of the interaction (and hence biological specificity) isconsequently defined by the structural complementarity of the functionalepitopes of ligand and receptor. Detailed mutagenesis studies have shownthat the most significant residues that make up the functional epitopesof cytokines and receptors are hydrophobic contacts involving eithernon-polar side chains such as tryptophan, the aliphatic components ofnon-polar side chains or the polypeptide backbone. The non-polar “core”is surrounded by a halo of polar residues of lesser importance forbinding energy. Kinetic studies indicate that the primary role of thefunctional epitopes is to stabilize protein-protein interaction bydecreasing the dissociation rate of the complex. It has been suggestedthat the initial contact between cytokine and receptor is dominated byrandom diffusion or “rolling” of protein surfaces producing manyunstable contacts. The complex is then stabilized when the functionalepitopes of the receptor and ligand engage (see, e.g., Bravo and Heath,2000, EMBO J. 19:2399-2411).

Yeast display was used to determine the amino acid residues involved inthe functional epitope on glucagon receptor recognized by mAb5. Alibrary of single point mutants of the glucagon receptor extracellulardomain (GCGR-ECD) was displayed on yeast cells. The GCGR-ECD-expressingyeast cells (the “original library”) were then incubated with eitherfluorescence-labeled mAb5 or a pool of fluorescence-labeled non-mAb5anti-glucagon receptor antibodies. Wild-type glucagon receptor was usedas a positive control. Yeast cells displaying GCGR-ECD mutants withdecreased antibody binding relative to wild-type GCGR-ECD were isolatedby FACS. This population of cells (the “enriched library”) was deepsequenced and the data analyzed to determine enrichment of each mutant.Enrichment is defined as the incidence of a specific mutant in theenriched library (following FACS isolation) in comparison to itsincidence in the original library, e.g., an enrichment of 4.0 means thatthe mutant is present in the enriched library at four times thefrequency at which it is found in the original library. Greaterenrichment corresponds to GCGR-ECD mutants with lower binding affinity.Three rounds of panning were carried out, with consistency between thethree different rounds. Table 21 summarizes the results of the yeastdisplay analysis.

TABLE 21 GCGR-ECD Mutants Wild-type Enrichment Position of amino acidmAb5 Non-mAb5 point at mutated Panning Panning Panning pooled mutationposition Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 antibodies 33 F 4.8 5.3 5.3 0.3 36 W5.4 6.7 8.5 6.1 38 L 2.5 3.3 3.9 0.2 41 D 3.4 4.0 4.2 0.4 44 H 3.2 3.33.9 0.1 45 H 4.4 5.1 5.3 0.4 54 T 1.0 1.0 1.1 3.4 60 R 3.8 5.0 5.7 31.561 T 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.4 64 K 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 74 N 2.7 2.5 2.8 5.3 87 W 0.80.6 0.4 0.4 88 H 1.3 1.2 0.9 1.6 90 K 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.9 93 H 1.7 1.9 2.14.1 94 R 1.8 2.0 2.4 5.1 97 F 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.2 99 R 0.7 0.6 0.7 1.0 103 D2.3 2.2 1.9 2.4 108 R 1.3 1.5 1.3 2.8

Mutated positions with enrichment greater than three in any round areconsidered to be part of the functional epitope on glucagon receptorrecognized by mAb5. Based on the yeast display analysis, the functionalepitope on glucagon receptor recognized by mAb5 involves the amino acidresidues at positions 33, 36, 38, 41, 44, 45 and 60 of SEQ ID NO: 1(Table 21, bold positions). Position 60 is the only enriched residue notalso found in the structural epitope; it is also enriched in the pool ofnon-mAb5 antibodies, indicating demonstrating the residue at thisposition perturbs protein folding.

An analysis was carried out to determine which positions in the mutantlibrary and in the structural epitope are not enriched. Out of thefifteen positions in the structural epitope, eleven positions are alsopresent in the mutant library. Out of these eleven positions, sixpositions are enriched. The five non-enriched positions in thefunctional epitope are 31, 34, 42, 48 and 64. All the non-enrichedpositions are located on the periphery of the structural epitope.

Although the disclosed teachings have been described with reference tovarious applications, methods, kits, and compositions, it will beappreciated that various changes and modifications can be made withoutdeparting from the teachings herein and the claimed invention below. Theforegoing examples are provided to better illustrate the disclosedteachings and are not intended to limit the scope of the teachingspresented herein. While the present teachings have been described interms of these exemplary embodiments, the skilled artisan will readilyunderstand that numerous variations and modifications of these exemplaryembodiments are possible without undue experimentation. All suchvariations and modifications are within the scope of the currentteachings.

All references cited herein, including patents, patent applications,papers, text books, and the like, and the references cited therein, tothe extent that they are not already, are hereby incorporated byreference in their entirety. In the event that one or more of theincorporated literature and similar materials differs from orcontradicts this application, including but not limited to definedterms, term usage, described techniques, or the like, this applicationcontrols.

The foregoing description and Examples detail certain specificembodiments of the invention and describes the best mode contemplated bythe inventors. It will be appreciated, however, that no matter howdetailed the foregoing may appear in text, the invention may bepracticed in many ways and the invention should be construed inaccordance with the appended claims and any equivalents thereof.

1. (canceled)
 2. (canceled)
 3. (canceled)
 4. (canceled)
 5. (canceled) 6.(canceled)
 7. (canceled)
 8. (canceled)
 9. (canceled)
 10. (canceled) 11.(canceled)
 12. (canceled)
 13. (canceled)
 14. (canceled)
 15. An isolatedcell line that produces an isolated antagonist antibody thatspecifically binds to glucagon receptor and comprises: a heavy chainvariable region (VH) comprising a VH complementarity determining regionone (CDR1), VH CDR2, and VH CDR3 of the VH having the amino acidsequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 11; and a light chain variable region (VL)comprising a VL CDR1, VL CDR2, and VL CDR3 of the VL having the aminoacid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:
 10. 16. An isolated nucleic acidencoding tho antibody of claim 1 an isolated antagonist antibody thatspecifically binds to glucagon receptor and comprises: a heavy chainvariable region (VH) comprising a VH complementarity determining regionone (CDR1), VH CDR2, and VH CDR3 of the VH having the amino acidsequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 11; and a light chain variable region (VL)comprising a VL CDR1, VL CDR2, and VL CDR3 of the VL having the aminoacid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:
 10. 17. A recombinant expressionvector comprising the nucleic acid of claim
 16. 18. A host cellcomprising the expression vector of claim
 17. 19. (canceled)
 20. Amethod of producing an anti-glucagon receptor antagonist antibody, themethod comprising: culturing the isolated cell line of claim 15 underconditions wherein the antibody is produced; and recovering theantibody.
 21. A method of producing an anti-glucagon receptor antagonistantibody, the method comprising: culturing a cell line comprisingnucleic acid encoding an antibody comprising a heavy chain comprisingthe amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 87 or 88 and a light chaincomprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 89 underconditions wherein the antibody is produced; and recovering theantibody.
 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the heavy and light chainsare encoded on separate vectors.
 23. The method of claim 21, wherein theheavy and light chains are encoded on the same vector.
 24. (canceled)25. (canceled)
 26. (canceled)
 27. (canceled)
 28. (canceled) 29.(canceled)
 30. (canceled)
 31. (canceled)
 32. (canceled)